电厂燃气轮机的NOx污染危害及治理技术现状
Hazards of NOx Pollution from Gas Turbines in Power Plants and Current Status of Abatement Technologies
DOI: 10.12677/aepe.2026.143018, PDF,   
作者: 崔瑞康:华电湖北发电有限公司武昌热电分公司,湖北 武汉
关键词: NOx低氮燃烧技术脱硝技术NOx Low-NOx Combustion Technology Denitration Technology
摘要: 燃气轮机作为一种常用的发电设备,与传统的燃煤锅炉相比,其尾气含尘量极低,主要以CO2和水为主,无需复杂处理,环保优势显著。但是燃气轮机在运行过程中依然避免不了NOx的生成。NOx根据生成机制和条件分为热力型、燃料型和快速型三类。NOx的危害涵盖人体健康、生态环境、气候系统及材料设施等多个维度。针对该问题,详细介绍了目前NOx的主要治理技术。NOx的治理技术分为源头控制与末端治理:源头控制以低氮燃烧技术为核心,包括分级燃烧、烟气再循环、富氧燃烧、MILD技术以及氢/氨新能源燃料掺烧的NOx控制技术。末端治理则包括干法与湿法脱硝技术。未来需聚焦现有技术优化、多技术协同、绿色低碳创新及政策驱动下的超净排放技术开发,为电厂燃气轮机的清洁高效运行提供支撑。
Abstract: NOx is classified into three categories based on its formation mechanisms and conditions: thermal, fuel-bound, and prompt types. The hazards of NOx span multiple dimensions, including human health, ecological environment, climate system, and material facilities. Abatement technologies are divided into source control and end-of-pipe treatment: Source control centers on low-NOx combustion technologies, including staged combustion, flue gas recirculation, oxygen-enriched combustion, and MILD (Moderate or Intense Low-Oxygen Dilution) technology, which suppress NOx formation by optimizing combustion conditions. End-of-pipe treatment encompasses dry and wet denitration technologies, which achieve NOx removal through chemical reactions. Among them, dry denitration includes selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) technologies; wet denitration includes oxidative absorption, absorptive reduction, and complexation absorption technologies. In the future, focus should be placed on the optimization of existing technologies, synergy of multiple technologies, green and low-carbon innovation, and the development of ultra-clean emission technologies driven by policies, so as to provide support for the clean and efficient operation of gas turbines in power plants.
文章引用:崔瑞康. 电厂燃气轮机的NOx污染危害及治理技术现状[J]. 电力与能源进展, 2026, 14(3): 170-178. https://doi.org/10.12677/aepe.2026.143018

参考文献

[1] 毛洪钧, 李悦宁, 林应超, 等. 生物质锅炉氮氧化物排放控制技术研究进展[J]. 工程科学学报, 2019, 41(1): 1-11.
[2] 余明程, 王光华, 李文兵, 等. 焦炉加热过程中热力型氮氧化物的生成及影响因素研究[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2016, 42(10): 75-78.
[3] 范宝田, 严祯荣, 林齐叠, 等. 生物质燃料锅炉脱硝技术研究进展[J]. 应用化工, 2022, 51(5): 1490-1494.
[4] 刘敦禹, 秦明, 刘辉, 等. 深度空气分级条件下炉内氮氧化物生成的数值模拟[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2011, 17(5): 469-475.
[5] 王杰. 天然气低氮燃烧技术研究现状与进展[J]. 现代化工, 2022, 42(S2): 47-50.
[6] 王晶, 廖昌建, 王海波, 等. 锅炉低氮燃烧技术研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2022, 28(2): 99-114.
[7] 陈耿, 李瑞瑜, 陈春贻, 等. 典型大气细颗粒物与臭氧复合污染过程中挥发性有机物的贡献及来源[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2022, 44(9): 1222-1227.
[8] Sun, S., Zheng, N., Wang, S., Li, Y., Hou, S., An, Q., et al. (2022) Inhalation Bioaccessibility and Risk Assessment of Metals in PM2.5 Based on a Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry Model in the Smelting District of Northeast China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 8915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Thangavel, P., Park, D. and Lee, Y. (2022) Recent Insights into Particulate Matter (PM2.5)-Mediated Toxicity in Humans: An Overview. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, Article 7511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Demchenko, I.T., Atochin, D.N., Gutsaeva, D.R., et al. (2008) Contributions of Nitric Oxide Synthase Isoforms to Pulmonary Oxygen Toxicity, Local vs. Mediated Effects. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology, 294, L984-L990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 王迪, 李少宁, 鲁绍伟, 等. 城市森林对氮氧化物(NOx)净化作用研究进展[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2018, 41(8): 114-125.
[12] 李勇华. 大气中二氧化硫和氮氧化物的污染及防治方法[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2015(12): 140.
[13] 俞璐. 氮氧化物对臭氧层的威胁[J]. 中国环境科学, 2010, 30(3): 327.
[14] Da Silva Vasconcelos, L.C., Do Nascimento, A.Q., Moreira, M.C., et al. (2009) Acid Rain and Geographic Climatology in Medium School. Geo UERJ, 1, 44-61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Kim, J. and Park, J. (2024) Numerical Analysis of Major Reaction Affecting to Nitrogen Oxide Formation under Okafor Reaction Mechanism. Energy & Environment, in Press.
[16] 杨远平, 马佳琪, 王茜, 等. 掺氨燃料先进清洁燃烧技术研究进展及探讨[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2025, 31(3): 29-40.
[17] 王超伟, 王长安, 王鹏乾, 等. 空气深度分级燃烧NOx排放特性的CHEMKIN模拟研究[J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2020, 26(1): 42-50.
[18] 张群力, 苏媛, 刘涛, 等. 燃气锅炉低氮排放技术应用与进展[J]. 化学工程, 2024, 52(8): 18-24+83.
[19] 宋少鹏. 基于烟气再循环的工业锅炉天然气低氮燃烧研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 清华大学, 2016.
[20] 高晗, 朱彤, 朱荣俊, 等. 烟气再循环对350kW燃气锅炉超低氮燃烧工况稳定性的影响[J]. 工业锅炉, 2020(1): 32-37+46.
[21] 刘敦禹, 蔡雨阳, 金晶, 等. 富氧燃烧烟气净化工艺研究进展[J]. 洁净煤技术, 2021, 27(2): 79-91.
[22] 王吉龙, 揭涛, 苏毅, 等. MILD燃烧的研究进展及应用[J]. 工业锅炉, 2025(3): 1-10.
[23] 仝雨航, 涂垚杰, 刘豪. NH3/CH4在MILD燃烧方式下的NOx排放特性实验研究[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2025, 45(9): 3563-3572.
[24] 郑振海, 秦伟, 张超, 等. SCR烟气脱硝工艺在联合循环发电机组的应用[J]. 冶金动力, 2025(2): 99-102.
[25] Chen, Y., Liu, X., Wang, P., Mansoor, M., Zhang, J., Peng, D., et al. (2024) Challenges and Perspectives of Environmental Catalysis for Nox Reduction. JACS Au, 4, 2767-2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 李红霞, 薄雯, 李春颖, 等. 烟气脱硝技术研究进展[J]. 现代化工, 2015, 35(9): 30-33.
[27] 刘豪, 安丰磊, 王辉, 等. 低温型SCR催化剂在危废焚烧中的应用[J]. 冶金信息导刊, 2025, 62(4): 47-50.
[28] 杨加强, 梅毅, 王驰, 等. 湿法烟气脱硝技术现状及发展[J]. 化工进展, 2017, 36(2): 695-704.
[29] Mok, Y.S. (2006) Absorption-Reduction Technique Assisted by Ozone Injection and Sodium Sulfide for Nox Removal from Exhaust Gas. Chemical Engineering Journal, 118, 63-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[30] 杨景瑞, 王莹, 陈虎, 等. 烟气中NOx脱除技术的研究进展[J]. 化工环保, 2020, 40(5): 461-466.
[31] 涂垚杰. 低温预热条件下天然气和氧/煤MILD燃烧特性研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2016.
[32] 刘军, 汪瑞平, 宫恩蒙. 基于烟气再循环的循环流化床锅炉SNCR-SCR联合脱硝系统设计[J]. 电力学报, 2022, 37(4): 318-323.