一致偶应力理论下粗糙表面的接触
Contact of Rough Surfaces under the Theory of Consistent Couple Stress
DOI: 10.12677/ijm.2026.152013, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 曹 学, 雷东侠, 欧志英*:兰州理工大学理学院,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 微纳米尺度粗糙表面接触一致偶应力Micro-Nano Scale Rough Surface Contact Consistent Couple Stress
摘要: 随着现代科技的发展,材料结构在纳米尺度下的力学性能受到研究者的广泛关注。当接触尺寸由宏观缩小到纳米时,尺度效应对接触力学行为的影响将变得非常重要。本文通过理论分析的方法,研究了一致偶应力弹性理论下粗糙表面的接触问题。首先利用数值结果得到了考虑一致偶应力的单个纳米级粗糙度的接触面积和载荷随压痕深度变化的一般关系,然后基于G-W的接触模型提出了一种考虑一致偶应力的粗糙表面接触模型。揭示了一致偶应力和球形粗糙度对粗糙表面的接触载荷、实际接触面积和平均接触压力的影响。结果表明,与间距恒定的经典弹性G-W模型相比,该模型具有更大的法向载荷和更小的实际接触面积。此外,粗糙表面之间的接触载荷随着一致偶应力的增加而增加,但实际接触面积减小;当一致偶应力恒定时,球形粗糙度越大,接触载荷和实际接触面积就越大。
Abstract: With the development of modern technology, the mechanical properties of material structures at the nanoscale have attracted widespread attention from researchers. When the contact size is reduced from the macroscopic scale to the nanoscale, the scale effect on contact mechanics behavior becomes highly significant. This paper investigates the contact problem of rough surfaces under the consistent couple stress elasticity theory through theoretical analysis. First, numerical results are used to establish a general relationship between the contact area and load of a single nanoscale roughness element considering consistent couple stress, as they vary with indentation depth. Then, based on the Greenwood-Williamson contact model, a rough surface contact model incorporating consistent couple stress is proposed. The study reveals the effects of consistent couple stress and spherical roughness on the contact load, real contact area, and average contact pressure of rough surfaces. The results show that, compared to the classical elastic G-W model with constant spacing, the proposed model predicts a larger normal load and a smaller real contact area. Furthermore, the contact load between rough surfaces increases with increasing consistent couple stress, while the real contact area decreases; when consistent couple stress is held constant, larger spherical roughness leads to greater contact load and real contact area.
文章引用:曹学, 雷东侠, 欧志英. 一致偶应力理论下粗糙表面的接触[J]. 力学研究, 2026, 15(2): 125-135. https://doi.org/10.12677/ijm.2026.152013

参考文献

[1] Rubinstein, S.M., Cohen, G. and Fineberg, J. (2006) Contact Area Measurements Reveal Loading-History Dependence of Static Friction. Physical Review Letters, 96, Article ID: 256103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Popov, V.L. and Pohrt, R. (2018) Adhesive Wear and Particle Emission: Numerical Approach Based on Asperity-Free Formulation of Rabinowicz Criterion. Friction, 6, 260-273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Pérez-Ràfols, F., Larsson, R. and Almqvist, A. (2016) Modelling of Leakage on Metal-To-Metal Seals. Tribology International, 94, 421-427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Hertz, H. (1881) On the Contact of Elastic Solids. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 92, 156-171.
[5] Greenwood, J.A. and Williamson, J.B.P. (1966) Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 295, 300-319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Persson, B.N.J. (2001) Theory of Rubber Friction and Contact Mechanics. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 115, 3840-3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Whitehouse, D.J. and Archard, J.F. (1970) The Properties of Random Surfaces of Significance in Their Contact. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 316, 97-121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Nayak, P.R. (1971) Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces. Journal of Lubrication Technology, 93, 398-407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Bush, A.W., Gibson, R.D. and Thomas, T.R. (1975) The Elastic Contact of a Rough Surface. Wear, 35, 87-111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Greenwood, J.A. (2007) A Note on Nayak’s Third Paper. Wear, 262, 225-227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Chang, W.R., Etsion, I. and Bogy, D.B. (1987) An Elastic-Plastic Model for the Contact of Rough Surfaces. Journal of Tribology, 109, 257-263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Majumdar, A. and Bhushan, B. (1991) Fractal Model of Elastic-Plastic Contact between Rough Surfaces. Journal of Tribology, 113, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Li, C. and Wang, G. (2023) A Modified Greenwood-Williamson Contact Model with Asperity Interactions. Acta Mechanica, 234, 2859-2868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Gerberich, W.W., Tymiak, N.I., Grunlan, J.C., Horstemeyer, M.F. and Baskes, M.I. (2002) Interpretations of Indentation Size Effects. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 69, 433-442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Lim, C.W., Li, Z.R. and He, L.H. (2006) Size Dependent, Non-Uniform Elastic Field Inside a Nano-Scale Spherical Inclusion Due to Interface Stress. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43, 5055-5065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Huang, Z.P. and Sun, L. (2007) Size-Dependent Effective Properties of a Heterogeneous Material with Interface Energy Effect: From Finite Deformation Theory to Infinitesimal Strain Analysis. Acta Mechanica, 190, 151-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Ru, C.Q. (2009) Size Effect of Dissipative Surface Stress on Quality Factor of Microbeams. Applied Physics Letters, 94, Article ID: 051905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Hadjesfandiari, A.R. and Dargush, G.F. (2011) Couple Stress Theory for Solids. International Journal of Engineering Science, 49, 1317-1324.
[19] Gourgiotis, P.A., Zisis, T., Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Georgiadis, H.G. (2019) The Hertz Contact Problem in Couple-Stress Elasticity. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 168, 228-237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef