模拟法庭课程质量评价研究
Research on Quality Evaluation of Mock Court Courses
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2026.146395, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张艳琼, 左宜玄, 李苑颖, 杜国明*:华南农业大学人文与法学学院,广东 广州
关键词: 模拟法庭课程质量评价 Moot Court Course Quality Evaluate
摘要: 中国的法学教育随社会变迁呈现不同形态:古代法学教育扎根于传统文化并与儒家教育相融合,近代法学教育受到外部法律文化的深刻影响,现代法学教育经历了曲折发展,当前则面临前所未有的变革。模拟法庭课程契合法学人才培养目标,是从理论通向实践的关键环节。然而,该教学模式在实践中仍存在诸多问题,制约了其应有功能的发挥。文章基于体验式学习理论与法律实践教学评价的相关成果,系统分析了影响模拟法庭课程质量的因素,构建了涵盖知识掌握、实践能力、职业素养三个维度的评价框架,并设计了学生自评、互评、教师评价、外聘专家评价相结合的多主体评价方式。在明确教学环节与评价环节区别的基础上,提出了案例选择、角色分配、文书准备、正式开庭、综合评价等环节的具体实施路径。研究认为,建立科学的课程质量评价体系有助于引导教师深入分析课程影响因素,改进教学工作,提升课程质量。
Abstract: China’s legal education has taken on different forms with social changes: ancient legal education was rooted in traditional culture and integrated with Confucian education; modern legal education was profoundly influenced by external legal cultures; contemporary legal education has undergone a tortuous development; and at present, it faces unprecedented transformation. The mock court course aligns with the objectives of legal talent cultivation and serves as a critical bridge from theory to practice. However, this teaching model still faces numerous problems in practice, which constrain the fulfillment of its intended functions. Based on experiential learning theory and relevant achievements in the evaluation of legal practice teaching, this study systematically analyzes the factors affecting the quality of mock court courses, constructs an evaluation framework covering three dimensions—knowledge acquisition, practical ability, and professional ethics—and designs a multi-subject evaluation approach combining student self-assessment, peer assessment, teacher evaluation, and external expert evaluation. On the basis of clarifying the distinction between teaching procedures and evaluation procedures, this paper proposes specific implementation pathways for stages including case selection, role assignment, document preparation, court hearing, and comprehensive evaluation. The study suggests that establishing a scientific course quality evaluation system can help guide teachers to deeply analyze the factors influencing the course, improve teaching practices, and enhance course quality.
文章引用:张艳琼, 左宜玄, 李苑颖, 杜国明. 模拟法庭课程质量评价研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(6): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.146395

参考文献

[1] 高向平. 模拟法庭教学法的应用与评价[J]. 黑河学刊, 2009(7): 84-86.
[2] 李煜凯. 大学课程质量评价指标体系设计及实证分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2017.
[3] 杨成, 邵毅超. 行政诉讼法教学中运用模拟法庭之探析[J]. 哈尔滨学院学报, 2010(10): 21-24.
[4] 万里鹏. 实体法引入模似法庭演习方法之探讨[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2016(3): 89-91.
[5] 高晋康, 杨春禧, 徐冰. 法学专业本科实习的检讨与实践探索[J]. 社会科学研究, 2012(2): 91-94.
[6] 陈海峰. 卓越法治人才培养视野下的模拟法庭实践教学评价体系研究[J]. 法制博览, 2023(14): 53-54.
[7] 王利军, 凌洁华, 刘俊凤. 基于CIPP评价模型的生涯发展教育评价体系构建研究[J]. 教育观察, 2025, 14(16): 1-5+10.
[8] 房文翠. 法学教育中的法学实践教学原则[J]. 中国大学教学, 2010(6): 72-74.
[9] 黄进, 张桂林, 李树忠, 等. 创新同步实践教学模式培养卓越法律人才[J]. 中国高等教育, 2014(17): 28-30+46.
[10] 肖凯. 以实践为导向的法学教育改革路径建构[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026, 34(3): 26-40.
[11] 王晨光. “个案全过程教学法”是探索法律实践教学新路径[J]. 法学, 2013(4): 46-51.