神经机器翻译在财经文本译后编辑中的应用分析——以《经济学人》为例
An Analytical Study on the Application of Neural Machine Translation in Post-Editing of Financial Texts—Taking The Economist as a Case Example
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.146509, PDF,   
作者: 李玥维, 唐丽君:贵州财经大学外语学院,贵州 贵阳;吕 梅:贵州财经大学管理科学与工程学院,贵州 贵阳
关键词: 人工智能神经机器翻译技术译后编辑AI Neural Machine Translation Tech Post-Editing
摘要: 神经机器翻译(NMT)技术显著提升了翻译任务的效率与质量。本文以《经济学人》财经类文章为研究对象,本文选取典型翻译实例,对比分析主流神经机器翻译输出与人工译文在多方面的差异,探讨神经机器翻译在译后编辑实践中的优势与局限。研究发现,NMT在文化传递、情感表达等复杂任务中仍存在不足,尤其在跨领域翻译的上下文理解与语义准确性方面面临挑战。基于案例分析,本文进一步总结了译后编辑中常见的问题类型并讨论领域差异对机器翻译输出的影响,以及人工编辑在修正语义偏差和语用失配中的关键作用。
Abstract: Neural Machine Translation (NMT) technology has significantly improved the efficiency and quality of translation tasks. Focusing on financial and economic articles from The Economist, this paper selects typical translation instances to comparatively analyze the multifaceted differences between mainstream NMT outputs and human translations, exploring the advantages and limitations of NMT in post-editing practice. The study finds that NMT still shows deficiencies in complex tasks such as cultural transfer and affective expression, and faces particular challenges in context understanding and semantic accuracy within cross-domain translation. Based on case analysis, this paper further summarizes common error types encountered in post-editing and discusses the impact of domain differences on machine translation output, as well as the critical role of human editing in correcting semantic deviations and pragmatic mismatches.
文章引用:李玥维, 唐丽君, 吕梅. 神经机器翻译在财经文本译后编辑中的应用分析——以《经济学人》为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(6): 141-151. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.146509

参考文献

[1] 马潇, 田永红, 赵伟. 基于神经网络的机器翻译研究综述[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2025, 61(22): 36-54.
[2] 李亚超, 熊德意, 张民. 神经机器翻译综述[J]. 计算机学报, 2018, 41(12): 2734-2755.
[3] Laskar, S.R., Paul, B., Adhikary, P.K., et al. (2021) Neural Machine Translation for Tamil-Telugu Pair. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Machine Translation, Punta Cana, 10-11 November 2021, 284-287.
[4] 韩子满, 柴通达. 人工智能知识翻译能力探析——以文学掌故为例[J]. 外语电化教学, 2024(5): 3-10+105.
[5] Oncevay, A., Smiley, C. and Liu, X. (2025) The Impact of Domain-Specific Terminology on Machine Translation for Finance in European Languages. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), Albuquerque, April 2025, 2758-2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 郭望皓, 胡富茂. 神经机器翻译译文评测及译后编辑研究[J]. 北京第二外国语学院学报, 2021, 43(5): 66-82.
[7] 仲文明, 王迪, 田莎. 生成式人工智能与神经网络机器翻译人工译后编辑效率对比研究[J]. 翻译研究与教学, 2024(2): 96-105.
[8] 杨娇. 基于句子级上下文内容的神经机器翻译方法[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2021, 29(1): 194-199.
[9] Dou, Z.Y., Wang, X.Y., Hu, J.J. and Neubig, G. (2019) Domain Differential Adaptation for Neural Machine Translation. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Neural Generation and Translation, Hong Kong, November 2019, 59-69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Chu, C. and Wang, R. (2020) A Survey of Domain Adaptation for Machine Translation. Journal of Information Processing, 28, 413-426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Ki, D. and Carpuat, M. (2024) Guiding Large Language Models to Post-Edit Machine Translation with Error Annotations. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024, Mexico, June 2024, 4253-4273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 卢植, 李珂. 神经机器翻译对文学文本译后编辑的影响——汉英小说译文词汇与句法对比研究[J]. 外语与翻译, 2025, 32(1): 1-9+98.
[13] Daems, J., Vandepitte, S., Hartsuiker, R., et al. (2015) The Impact of Machine Translation Error Types on Post-Editing Effort Indicators. Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice, Miami, 3 November 2015, 31-45.
[14] Lu, Q., Ding, L., Zhang, K., et al. (2025) MQM-APE: Toward High-Quality Error Annotation Predictors with Automatic Post-Editing in LLM Translation Evaluators. Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Abu Dhabi, 19-24 January 2025, 5570-5587.
[15] 何纯阳. 通过文本类型分类评估Google NMT的翻译质量[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 北京外国语大学, 2017.