权力和社会距离对6~8岁儿童分配行为的影响
The Impact of Power and Social Distance on Allocation Behavior in Children Aged 6~8 Years
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.166289, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 司 宇:南通大学教育科学学院,江苏 南通;艾佳祺:武汉商学院工商管理学院,湖北 武汉
关键词: 权力社会距离分配行为儿童Power Social Distance Distribution Behavior Children
摘要: 探讨权力与社会距离对6~8岁儿童分配行为的交互作用,尤其是在第一方与第三方情境下的差异。方法:实验一在第一方情境下采用2 (权力:高、低) × 2 (社会距离:近、远) × 2 (分配提议类型:优势不平等、劣势不平等) × 3 (年龄:6、7、8岁)混合实验设计,共140名儿童参与。实验二在第三方情境下,采用3 (权力:高、中、无) × 2 (分配提议类型) × 3 (年龄)设计,另取140名儿童。结果:儿童在资源获得情境中更倾向于利他分配给亲近者;6岁儿童在劣势不平等提议中接受率更高;7岁儿童开始考虑对方权力,表现出匹配假设;在第三方情境下,6~7岁儿童倾向于补偿假设,8岁儿童转向匹配假设。结论:权力与社会距离共同塑造儿童分配行为,年龄是关键的调节变量,6~8岁儿童的公平认知在利他倾向与策略性匹配上表现出显著的年龄组差异。
Abstract: This study examines the interaction between power and social distance on allocation behavior in children aged 6~8 years, with particular focus on differences between first-party and third-party contexts. Methods: Experiment 1 employed a mixed design with 2 (power: high, low) × 2 (social distance: close, distant) × 2 (allocation proposal type: advantage inequality, disadvantage inequality) × 3 (age: 6, 7, 8 years), involving 140 children. Experiment 2, conducted in a third-party context, used a 3 (power: high, moderate, none) × 2 (allocation proposal type) × 3 (age) design, involving an additional 140 children. Results: Children exhibited a stronger tendency toward altruistic allocation to close contacts in resource-acquisition scenarios; 6-year-old showed higher acceptance rates for disadvantage-inequality proposals; 7-year-old began considering the recipient’s power, demonstrating alignment with the matching hypothesis; in third-party contexts, children aged 6~7 favored the compensation hypothesis, while those aged 8 shifted toward the matching hypothesis. Conclusion: Power and social distance jointly shape children’s allocation behavior, with age serving as a critical moderating variable. Fairness cognition among children aged 6~8 shows significant age-group differences in both altruistic tendencies and strategic matching behaviors.
文章引用:司宇, 艾佳祺 (2026). 权力和社会距离对6~8岁儿童分配行为的影响. 心理学进展, 16(6), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.166289

参考文献

[1] 程南华, 李占星, 朱莉琪(2018). 儿童的社会权力认知及其与社会行为的关系. 心理科学进展, 26(2), 283-293.
[2] 刘璐, 肖雪, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳(2019). 儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点: 内群体偏爱的作用. 心理学报, 51(5), 584-597.
[3] 刘希平, 云薏霏, 柴凯轩, 李楠, 唐卫海(2021). 幼儿在不同规范标准下的意图判断: “副作用”效应. 心理与行为研究, 19(2), 237-243.
[4] 孙王, 莫秀锋(2017). 感恩对中班幼儿资源分配行为的影响. 学前教育研究, (12), 24-36.
[5] 谈晨皓, 王沛, 崔诣晨(2017). 我会在谁面前舍弃利益?——博弈对象的能力与社会距离对名利博弈倾向的影响. 心理学报, 49(9), 1206-1218.
[6] 王斯, 苏彦捷(2013). 从理解到使用: 心理理论与儿童不同情境中的分配公平性. 心理学报, 45(11), 1242-1250.
[7] 肖雪, 刘璐, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳(2021). 内群体偏爱与儿童基于贡献的分配公平性: 心理理论的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(4), 498-507.
[8] 张珊明, 罗伏生, 钟毅平, 陈芸(2013). 权力刻板印象及自我卷入的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(5), 751-753+759.
[9] 贺晓玲, 陈俊(2020). 3-5岁幼儿权力概念多重隐喻的认知发展. 心理学报, 52(2), 149-161.
[10] 谭千保, 邓磊, 张湘一, 常志彬, 欧阳益(2019). 社会距离与分配差距对儿童有利不公平厌恶的影响. 心理科学, 42(5), 1141-1147.
[11] 汪晨, 俞睿玮(2020). 社会权力认知情境下3-6岁幼儿公平分配行为的发展特征研究. 潍坊工程职业学院学报, 33(6), 44-51.
[12] 牛玉柏, 丁歆盈, 彭玲玲, 宋嘉清(2022). 基于支配和声望的社会权力对3-8岁儿童资源分配的影响. 应用心理学, 28(2), 115-124.
[13] 康丹, 郭炀炀, 陈杰, 蔡术, 张颖杰, 曹诗悦(2023). 分配对象和分配情境对4-6岁幼儿分配行为的影响. 心理发展与教育, 39(5), 609-616.
[14] 刘文, 张雪, 张玉, 俞睿玮(2017). 4-8岁儿童公平认知与行为差距: 社会比较的作用. 心理学报, 49(12), 1504-1512.
[15] Charafeddine, R., Mercier, H., Clément, F., Kaufmann, L., Reboul, A., & Van der Henst, J. (2016). Children’s Allocation of Resources in Social Dominance Situations. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1843-1857.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two Ways to the Top: Evidence That Dominance and Prestige Are Distinct Yet Viable Avenues to Social Rank and Influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103-125.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Cheng, N., Wan, Y., An, J., Gummerum, M., & Zhu, L. (2021). Power Grabbed or Granted: Children’s Allocation of Resources in Social Power Situations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, Article 105192.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A Review and Reformulation of Social Information-Processing Mechanisms in Children’s Social Adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101.[CrossRef
[19] Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in Young Children. Nature, 454, 1079-1083.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling Other People: The Impact of Power on Stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.[CrossRef
[21] Hawley, P. H. (2002). Social Dominance and Prosocial and Coercive Strategies of Resource Control in Preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 167-176.[CrossRef
[22] Kajanus, A., Afshordi, N., & Warneken, F. (2020). Children’s Understanding of Dominance and Prestige in China and the Uk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 23-34.[CrossRef
[23] Karakayali, N. (2009). Social Distance and Affective Orientations. Sociological Forum, 24, 538-562.[CrossRef
[24] Rochat, P., Dias, M. D. G., Guo, L., Broesch, T., Passos-Ferreira, C., Winning, A. et al. (2009). Fairness in Distributive Justice by 3-and 5-Year-Olds across Seven Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 416-442.