高一学生英语阅读课堂无聊情绪现状、具体表现及归因
Current Status, Manifestations, and Attributions of Boredom in English Reading Classrooms among Grade 10 Students
摘要: 本研究基于控制–价值理论(Control-Value Theory),采用混合研究方法系统地探讨了高一学生英语阅读课堂中无聊情绪的现状、具体表现和归因,研究发现高一学生在英语阅读课堂中普遍存在中等的无聊情绪,且无聊情绪的存在与高一学生的选科倾向没有显著相关,通过课堂观察发现学生的无聊情绪表现分为三种类型,分别是注意力分散、任务逃避以及身体倦怠行为,而产生英语阅读课堂的原因主要在于教师授课方式的单一化和任务活动设计的重复性和机械性,导致学生在英语阅读课堂中缺乏积极性,参与度低。基于研究发现,笔者提出教师可通过分层教学、真实情境任务设计提升学生参与度,本研究为高中英语阅读教学中的无聊情绪提供了实证依据,未来可进一步扩大样本量,探索不同教学模式对无聊情绪的调节机制。
Abstract: Based on the Control-Value Theory, this study employs a mixed-methods approach to systematically investigate the current status, specific manifestations, and attributions of boredom among Grade 10 students in English reading classrooms. The findings indicate that moderate levels of boredom are prevalent among these students during English reading sessions, and no significant correlation exists between boredom and students’ subject selection preferences. Classroom observations revealed three types of boredom manifestations: distraction, task avoidance, and physical lethargy. The primary causes of boredom were attributed to monotonous teaching methods and repetitive, mechanical task designs, resulting in low student engagement and participation. Based on these findings, the researcher suggests that teachers can enhance student engagement through differentiated instruction and authentic task design. This study provides empirical evidence on boredom in high school English reading instruction. Future research could expand the sample size and explore the moderating mechanisms of different teaching models on boredom.
文章引用:王雨佳. 高一学生英语阅读课堂无聊情绪现状、具体表现及归因[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(6): 197-205. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1661116

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中英语课程标准(2017年版2020年修订)[S]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020.
[2] 重庆市人民政府. 重庆市深化普通高等学校考试招生综合改革实施方案[EB/OL].
https://www.cq.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkml/szfwj/xzgfxwj/szf/201904/t20190423_8837041.html, 2019-04-22.
[3] 彭舒颖. 浅谈高中英语阅读能力的重要性及培养[J]. 亚太教育, 2016(36): 72, 5.
[4] 毕莹. 新高考模式下高中英语阅读教学的困境及对策[J]. 教学与管理, 2020(33): 105-107.
[5] Pekrun, R. (2006) The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Kruk, M. and Zawodniak, J. (2017) Nuda a praktyczna nauka języka angielskiego. Neofilolog, No. 49/1, 115-131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Li, C. (2021) A Control-Value Theory Approach to Boredom in English Classes among University Students in China. The Modern Language Journal, 105, 317-334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Li, C., Wei, L. and Lu, X. (2023) Contributions of Foreign Language Writing Emotions to Writing Achievement. System, 116, Article ID: 103074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Pawlak, M., Kruk, M., Zawodniak, J. and Pasikowski, S. (2020) Investigating Factors Responsible for Boredom in English Classes: The Case of Advanced Learners. System, 91, Article ID: 102259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Chen, W., Sun, P. and Yang, Z. (2022) Understanding Chinese Second Language Learners’ Foreign Language Learning Boredom in Online Classes: Its Conceptual Structure and Sources. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45, 3291-3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 李成陈, Jean-Marc Dewaele. 特质情绪智力及线上学习收获感对外语课堂无聊的预测作用[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2020(5): 33-44, 148-149.
[12] Su Ping, R.L., Verezub, E., Adi Badiozaman, I.F.B. and Chen, W.S. (2019) Tracing EFL Students’ Flipped Classroom Journey in a Writing Class: Lessons from Malaysia. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57, 305-316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Liu, W. and Xie, Z. (2024) Investigating Factors Responsible for More Boredom in Online Live EFL Classes. Sage Open, 14, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Resnik, P. and Dewaele, J. (2020) Trait Emotional Intelligence, Positive and Negative Emotions in First and Foreign Language Classes: A Mixed-Methods Approach. System, 94, Article ID: 102324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Li, C., Feng, E., Zhao, X. and Dewaele, J. (2024) Foreign Language Learning Boredom: Refining Its Measurement and Determining Its Role in Language Learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 46, 893-920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef