基于FCFF模型企业价值评估研究——以华润三九为例
Study on Enterprise Value Evaluation Based on FCFF Model—A Case Study of China Resources Sanjiu Medical & Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
摘要: 在当下资本市场活动中,企业价值评估至关重要,而FCFF模型与华润三九的经营特征契合,故以此为工具。研究先阐述企业价值评估理论,介绍市场法、收益法、成本法及FCFF模型原理与参数确定。接着分析华润三九概况与行业竞争地位,其在OTC和处方药领域优势显著,但也面临挑战。然后进行FCFF模型适用性分析,从理论、数据基础与参数预测、行业特性等方面,说明该模型适用于华润三九。再详细阐述预测期确定、自由现金流预测、折现率预测及企业价值计算过程,得出2024年企业价值为632.67亿元,与实际股价偏差率1.84%。最后分析评估结果影响因素,提出优化现金流管理等建议,为FCFF模型在医药企业尤其是华润三九的估值应用提供了实证参考。
Abstract: Enterprise value evaluation is crucial in current capital market activities, and the FCFF model aligns with the operational characteristics of China Resources Sanjiu, hence it is adopted as the research tool. The study first elaborates on enterprise value evaluation theories, introducing the market approach, income approach, cost approach, as well as the principles and parameter determination of the FCFF model. Then it analyzes the overview and industry competitive position of China Resources Sanjiu, noting its prominent advantages in the OTC and prescription drug sectors while also facing challenges. Next, it carries out an applicability analysis of the FCFF model, demonstrating the model’s suitability for China Resources Sanjiu from the perspectives of theory, data foundation and parameter prediction, and industry characteristics. It then details the process of determining the forecast period, forecasting free cash flow, predicting the discount rate, and calculating enterprise value, concluding that the enterprise value in 2024 was 63.267 billion yuan, with a deviation rate of 1.84% from the actual stock price. Finally, this paper analyzes the influencing factors of the evaluation results and puts forward suggestions such as optimizing cash flow management, providing empirical reference for the application of the FCFF model in the valuation of pharmaceutical enterprises, especially China Resources Sanjiu.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2023) Quality Control Standards for Automated Valuation Models. The Federal Register, 88, 66408-66433. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/09/29/2023-20588/quality-control-standards-for-automated-valuation-models
|
|
[2]
|
Jaromír, V. and Pavla, V. (2021) The Applicability of FCFF Method Evaluating an Enterprise of Real Estate Segment. SHS Web of Conferences, 91, Article ID: 01042.
|
|
[3]
|
Zambrano, E.A. and Sequera, R. (2020) The Valuation of Options on Index Futures with Stochastic Dividend Yields. International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives, 7, 375-396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
施金龙, 李绍丽. 企业价值评估方法综述与评价[J]. 江苏科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 9(1): 81-83.
|
|
[5]
|
陈蕾, 刘旭. FCFF模型参数选取对企业价值影响的统计分析[J]. 财会月刊, 2012(27): 40-45.
|
|
[6]
|
胡晓明, 冯军. 企业估值中折现率的确定: 基于CAMP模型[J]. 会计之友, 2014(2): 18-23.
|
|
[7]
|
赵振洋, 张渼. 科创板生物医药企业价值评估研究——基于修正的FCFF估值模型[J]. 中国资产评估, 2019(11): 8-16.
|
|
[8]
|
侯烨. 基于FCFF估值法的奥特维企业价值评估[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2023.
|
|
[9]
|
周佳阅. 基于FCFF模型的H公司企业价值评估研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2019.
|
|
[10]
|
姜毅. 基于自由现金流量折现模型的上市公司价值评估——以青岛啤酒为例[J]. 价值工程, 2019, 38(32): 1-4.
|