面向低碳与经济性协同优化的光储充一体化平台调度策略综述
A Review of Dispatching Strategies for Photovoltaic-Storage-Charging Integrated Platforms towards Low-Carbon and Economic Synergistic Optimization
DOI: 10.12677/aepe.2026.143023, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 钱玉儒, 秦梦茹, 孙鑫志:青岛理工大学临沂校区土木与建筑工程系,山东 临沂
关键词: 光储充一体化低碳调度经济性优化Integrated Photovoltaic-Storage-Charging Low-Carbon Dispatch Economic Optimization
摘要: 为了平衡“双碳”目标下光储充一体化平台联通交通网与配电网时低碳性与经济性之间的矛盾,本文系统总结面向低碳–经济协同优化的调度策略。调度架构从集中式向边云协同演变;协同建模包括权重系数法、约束转化法和帕累托优化法;针对光伏与充电负荷不确定性,通过随机规划、鲁棒优化、分布鲁棒优化和模型预测控制可兼顾保守性、计算效率;平台参与绿电交易、碳普惠、CCER等碳市场,结合需求响应与主从博弈实现用户交互。结果表明,目前的研究中存在多时间尺度协同、碳流追踪精度、博弈模型现实性和算法可解释性不足的问题。未来应重点发展数字孪生虚实协同、可解释人工智能、源–网–车–储–碳多维协同和信息物理安全防御。
Abstract: To balance the contradiction between low-carbon performance and economic efficiency of the photovoltaic-storage-charging integrated platform connecting the transportation network and distribution grid under the “dual carbon” goals, this paper systematically reviews dispatching strategies for low-carbon and economic synergistic optimization. The dispatching architecture evolves from centralized to edge-cloud collaboration; synergistic modeling includes weight coefficient method, constraint transformation method, and Pareto optimization method. To address uncertainties in photovoltaic output and charging load, stochastic programming, robust optimization, distributionally robust optimization, and model predictive control are employed, balancing conservatism and computational efficiency. The platform participates in carbon markets such as green power trading, carbon inclusion, and CCER, combined with demand response and Stackelberg game for user interaction. Results indicate that existing studies suffer from insufficient multi-timescale coordination, low carbon flow tracking accuracy, unrealistic game models, and weak algorithm interpretability. Future research should focus on digital twin-based virtual-real collaboration, explainable artificial intelligence, source-grid-vehicle-storage-carbon multi-dimensional synergy, and cyber-physical security defense.
文章引用:钱玉儒, 秦梦茹, 孙鑫志. 面向低碳与经济性协同优化的光储充一体化平台调度策略综述[J]. 电力与能源进展, 2026, 14(3): 224-233. https://doi.org/10.12677/aepe.2026.143023

参考文献

[1] 康童, 朱吉然, 冯楚瑞, 等. 面向光储充一体化社区的有序充电策略研究[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2024, 52(9): 132-142.
[2] 李峥嵘, 刘雨欣, 朱晗, 等. 面向“双碳”目标的光储一体化建筑集群电力协同调度方法研究综述[J]. 建筑节能(中英文), 2023, 51(8): 1-10.
[3] 李姚旺, 张宁, 杜尔顺, 等. 基于碳排放流的电力系统低碳需求响应机制研究及效益分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2022, 42(8): 2830-2842.
[4] 陈威, 王永恒, 沈欣炜, 等. 计及碳排放流的光储充一体化电站及加氢站协同规划[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(13): 40-49.
[5] 张岩, 韩伟, 宋闯, 等. 含电动汽车的光储充一体化电站设施规划与运行联合优化[J]. 储能科学与技术, 2022, 11(5): 1502-1511.
[6] Lu, Z.G., Qi, S.J., Zhang, J.F., Cai, Y., Guo, X. and Luo, S. (2021) An Improved Multi-Objective Bacterial Colony Chemotaxis Algorithm Based on Pareto Dominance. Soft Computing, 26, 69-87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Lu, Z., Zhao, H., Xiao, H., Wang, H. and Wang, H. (2015) An Improved Multi-Objective Bacteria Colony Chemotaxis Algorithm and Convergence Analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 31, 274-292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Zhang, X.H., Zhao, X.X., Zhong, J.Q. and Ma, N. (2020) Low Carbon Multi‐Objective Scheduling of Integrated Energy System Based on Ladder Light Robust Optimization. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 30, e12498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] 司翠平, 刘映泉. 基于任务分配的无人机蜂群攻击控制优化[J]. 机械设计与制造工程, 2023, 52(9): 45-49.
[10] Yesilyurt, G., Andic, C., Aydin, E. and Turkay, B. (2024) Optimum Allocation and Sizing of Storages with Multi-Objective Grey Wolf Optimizer. 2024 8th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP), Malatya, 21-22 September 2024, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Yang, H.Z., Ma, Q.L., Zhang, P., Li, Z., Cheng, Z. and Wang, L. (2026) Optimizing the Configuration of Mogwo’s Distributed Energy Storage for Low-Carbon Enhancements. Energies, 19, Article 1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 程杉, 刘延光, 刘炜炜, 等. 计及经济性和低碳性的光储充一体化电站多目标优化配置[J]. 电力工程技术, 2024, 43(4): 147-155.
[13] Haimes, Y.Y., Lasdon, L.S. and Wismer, D.A. (1971) On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1, 296-297.
[14] Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2002) A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 182-197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 康重庆, 程耀华, 孙彦龙, 等. 电力系统碳排放流的递推算法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017, 41(18): 10-16.
[16] Xie, B., Zhang, L., Zhao, W., Yuan, Y., Chen, X., Luo, X., et al. (2025) A Study on Optimal Scheduling of Low-Carbon Virtual Power Plants Based on Dynamic Carbon Emission Factors. Sustainability, 18, Article 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 王飚, 路捷, 沙爱民, 等. 考虑光伏不确定性影响的高速公路光储换一体化能源管理策略[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2024, 24(4): 14-30.
[18] 金怡婷, 吴含欣, 董树锋. 基于动态碳排放因子的源荷协同低碳需求响应[J]. 电力建设, 2026, 47(2): 188-202.
[19] Kreuwel, F.P.M., Knap, W.H., Visser, L.R., van Sark, W.G.J.H.M., Vilà-Guerau de Arellano, J. and van Heerwaarden, C.C. (2020) Analysis of High Frequency Photovoltaic Solar Energy Fluctuations. Solar Energy, 206, 381-389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 赵子鋆, 彭清文, 邓铭, 等. 考虑多因素影响与误差修正的充电站负荷预测[J]. 浙江电力, 2024, 43(4): 21-28.
[21] 赵书强, 赵蓬飞, 韦子瑜, 等. 数据驱动下考虑多预测误差带信息的多场景随机优化调度[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44(11): 52-59.
[22] 王波, 王蔚, 马恒瑞, 等. 基于Wasserstein两阶段分布鲁棒的多主体多能微网合作博弈优化调度[J]. 电工技术学报, 2025, 40(17): 5553-5570.
[23] Wang, J.Y., Zhu, R.J., Liao, W.L. and Yin, Z. (2025) Research on Optimal Scheduling of a Photovoltaic-Storage-Charging Integrated Power Station Based on Intraday Two-Stage Model Predictive Control. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 17, Article 034107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 王玉洁, 谭忠富, 鞠立伟, 等. 风-光-储联合参与绿电交易下多主体效益分配模型[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(5): 134-140.
[25] 李伊竹林, 韩肖清, 李廷钧, 等. 基于动态电-碳需求响应的综合能源系统日前多元低碳交易方法[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(12): 24-35.
[26] 邵文锋, 何宇, 温拥军, 等. 计及EV的综合能源系统双层优化调度策略[J]. 电子科技, 2024, 37(11): 85-94.
[27] 李晨朝, 陈佳佳, 王敬华. 基于主从博弈和IGDT的含电动汽车需求响应光伏园区储能优化配置[J]. 电力建设, 2025, 46(4): 126-136.
[28] 刘国明, 于晖, 康凯, 等. 考虑需求响应与碳排放的光储充电站容量配置[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2021, 33(7): 106-112.