积极刑法观视域下高空抛物罪的刑法教义学分析
Dogmatic Analysis of the Crime of Throwing Objects from Height from the Perspective of Active Criminal Law Approach
摘要: 随着刑事立法进入活跃期,不断增长的法益保护需求决定了以积极刑法观为指引的轻罪立法具有正当性。《刑法修正案(十一)》中高空抛物罪的增设作为轻罪立法的典型,是对积极刑法观的贯彻,符合风险社会法益保护的需要的同时也不会违背刑法谦抑性原则。对高空抛物罪的刑法教义学分析需要秉持客观解释、实质解释的立场。高空抛物罪的保护法益是公共秩序。“高空”应当指距离被抛掷物品坠落点具有一定高度差的高处,“抛掷”必须存在行为施行方,对物品施加一定的作用力,借助工具实施也是行为的一种,对“物品”的种类不应当予以限制。“情节严重”在犯罪构成体系中是起实行行为结束之后反映法益侵害程度的作用,既包括发生实际损害结果的情形,也包括威胁他人的人身或者财产的潜在危险。
Abstract: As criminal legislation has entered an active phase, the growing demand for legal interest protection justifies the enactment of misdemeanor laws guided by an active criminal law approach. The addition of the crime of throwing objects from a high altitude in the Criminal Law Amendment (XI) serves as a typical example of misdemeanor legislation, reflecting the implementation of the active criminal law approach. It meets the needs of legal interest protection in a risk society without violating the principle of modesty in criminal law. A criminal law dogmatic analysis of the crime of throwing objects from a high altitude should adhere to an objective and substantive interpretation. The legal interest protected by this crime is public order. “High altitude” refers to a certain height difference between the throwing point and the landing point. “Throwing” requires an act by the perpetrator involving the exertion of force on an object, and the use of tools also constitutes an act of throwing. The types of “objects” should not be subject to restrictions. “Serious circumstances”, as part of the constitutive elements of the crime, serve to reflect the degree of legal interest infringement after the completion of the act, including both situations where actual damage occurs and those where potential danger threatens the safety of persons or property of others.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
卢建平. 为什么说我国已经进入轻罪时代[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(3): 132-142.
|
|
[2]
|
王煜, 孙国月. 实质解释立场下高空抛物罪的限缩适用[J]. 河北法学, 2022, 40(9): 185-200.
|
|
[3]
|
张明楷. 增设新罪的概念——对积极刑法观的支持[J]. 现代法学, 2020, 42(5): 150-166.
|
|
[4]
|
刘艳红. 积极预防性刑法观的中国实践发展以《刑法修正案(十一)》为视角的分析[J]. 比较法研究, 2021, 35(1): 62-75.
|
|
[5]
|
肖鹏. 我国刑事法网的基本现状及发展趋势——兼评积极主义刑法观[J]. 河北法学, 2021, 39(10): 149-165.
|
|
[6]
|
张明楷. 法益初论[M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2003: 31.
|
|
[7]
|
贾健. 人类图像与刑法中的超个人法益——以自由主义和社群主义为视角[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2015, 21(6): 127-140.
|
|
[8]
|
张明楷. 论实质的法益概念——对法益概念的立法批判机能的肯定[J]. 法学家, 2021(1): 80-86, 193-194.
|
|
[9]
|
姜涛. 高空抛物罪的刑法教义学分析[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2021(5): 111-120, 243.
|
|
[10]
|
周光权. 刑法各论[M]. 第4版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2021: 419.
|
|
[11]
|
张开骏. 个罪法益与构成要件的解释方法[J]. 交大法学, 2024(5): 148-163.
|
|
[12]
|
陈俊秀, 陈姚. 高空抛物罪中“情节严重”之教义学阐释——基于《刑法》与《治安管理处罚法》的体系融贯[J]. 政法学刊, 2024, 41(4): 26-36.
|
|
[13]
|
彭文华. 《刑法修正案(十一)》关于高空抛物规定的理解与适用[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 42(1): 52-61.
|
|
[14]
|
张明楷. 刑法学(上) [M]. 第6版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2021: 78.
|
|
[15]
|
潘億佳. 高空抛物罪构成要件的法教义学分析——基于本罪公共秩序保护法益的展开[J]. 法大研究生, 2023(1): 96-120.
|