海洋环境公益诉讼中生态修复资金的监管困境与出路
The Dilemma and Way Out of the Supervision of Ecological Restoration Funds in Marine Environmental Public Interest Litigation
摘要: 在海洋环境公益诉讼的恢复性司法框架下,生态修复资金承担着受损海洋生态利益代偿与恢复的核心功能。然而,由于立法供给不足与配套机制缺失,这笔资金在收缴、存放、审批、使用等环节面临诸多现实困境。要破解这些难题,需要从制度层面加以回应:通过专门立法明确资金的法律地位,构建“行政主导、司法监督”的跨部门协同监管体制,细化联席会议的跨部门统筹与独立受托人的第三方制衡机制,引入专家论证与全周期预算审核机制以规范资金使用,并依托数字化平台建立强制信息披露与多元化社会监督体系,从而使海洋生态修复资金真正实现专款专用、惠及海洋。
Abstract: Under the restorative justice framework of marine environmental public interest litigation, ecological restoration funds play a central role in compensating for and restoring damaged marine ecological interests. However, due to insufficient legislation and the absence of supporting mechanisms, these funds face numerous practical challenges in areas such as collection, deposit, approval, and utilization. To resolve these challenges, institutional responses are required at the legislative level: specific legislation should be enacted to clarify the legal status of these funds; a cross-departmental collaborative regulatory system characterized by “administrative leadership and judicial oversight” should be established; expert review and full-cycle budget audit mechanisms should be introduced to standardize fund usage; and a system of mandatory information disclosure and diversified public oversight should be built through digital platforms. These steps will ensure that marine ecological restoration funds are truly earmarked for their intended purposes and benefit the marine environment.
文章引用:周奕. 海洋环境公益诉讼中生态修复资金的监管困境与出路[J]. 法学, 2026, 14(6): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojls.2026.146160

参考文献

[1] 刘芸志. 中国海洋环境民事公益诉讼的实践检视、理论反思与制度完善[J]. 中国海商法研究, 2025, 36(3): 25-36.
[2] 严丹屏, 王春凤. 生态环境多中心治理路径探析[J]. 中国环境管理, 2010(4): 19-22.
[3] 史一舒. 论环境司法能动性与谦抑性之协调——兼论生态环境损害赔偿之司法走向[J]. 湖湘法学评论, 2023, 3(2): 116-138.
[4] 郭武, 岳子玉. 生态环境损害赔偿金的管理模式选择与法律制度构建[J]. 兰州学刊, 2020(12): 68-81.
[5] 巩固. 环境民事公益诉讼性质定位省思[J]. 法学研究, 2019, 41(3): 127-147.
[6] 王小钢. 生态环境损害赔偿诉讼的公共信托理论阐释——自然资源国家所有和公共信托环境权益的二维构造[J]. 法学论坛, 2018, 33(6): 32-38.
[7] 李挚萍. 环境修复法律制度探析[J]. 法学评论, 2013, 31(2): 103-109.
[8] 程多威, 王灿发. 论生态环境损害赔偿制度与环境公益诉讼的衔接[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44(2): 39-42.
[9] 侯佳儒, 王琳瑜. 新环保法环境法律责任制度实施10周年的回顾、反思与展望[J]. 环境影响评价, 2025, 47(4): 33-37.
[10] 秦天宝. 我国流域环境司法保护的转型与重构[J]. 东方法学, 2021(2): 158-167.
[11] 胡中华. 论美国环境公益诉讼中的环境损害救济方式及保障制度[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2010, 63(6): 930-935.
[12] 艾卡∙雷宾德, 王曦. 欧盟和德国的环境保护集体诉讼[J]. 交大法学, 2015(4): 5-14.
[13] 竺效, 蒙禹诺. 论生态损害赔偿资金的信托管理模式——以环境公益维护为视角[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 40(5): 83-93.