|
[1]
|
王妍妮, 罗应坤, 李成杰, 等. 烤烟不同施肥方式及施肥量对烟叶产质量影响[J]. 天津农业科学, 2026, 32(2): 17-23.
|
|
[2]
|
贺智谋, 夏天, 赖劲鹏, 等. 有机肥和复合肥配施对烤烟ZY157产量及生长的影响[J/OL]. 安徽农业科学: 1-7. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/34.1076.S.20260109.1308.002, 2026-06-02.
|
|
[3]
|
崔光周, 张警予, 王子臣, 等. 追施不同钾肥对水肥一体化滴灌烟草生长、产量及产值的影响[J]. 中南农业科技, 2025, 46(S1): 1-6.
|
|
[4]
|
赵阿娟, 区禧贤, 翟争光, 等. 一次性施用缓控释氮钾肥对烟草生长的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2025, 64(11): 102-109, 118.
|
|
[5]
|
Lai, X., Hou, S., Liu, S., Zhang, W., Peng, Z., Yang, J., et al. (2026) Mixed Application of Microbial Fertilizers Reshapes the Tobacco Rhizosphere Microbiome and Enhances Metabolic Coordination to Improve Crop Quality. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, Article 1726681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[6]
|
Wang, J., Yu, X. and Yu, T. (2026) Multiple Omics Analysis Reveals the Response Mechanism of Tobacco Seedlings to Different Magnesium Concentrations. BMC Plant Biology, 26, Article No. 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[7]
|
Liang, Y., Cheng, W., Peng, B., Xiao, J., He, Y., Xiao, H., et al. (2025) Microbial Response Mechanisms of Organic Nitrogen Substitution for Optimizing Tobacco Yield and Quality: The Key Role of 50% Organic Nitrogen. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, Article 1698745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[8]
|
唐艺, 涂学仙, 杨凯, 等. 不同烟草有机肥施用量对“红花大金元”农艺性状和产量品质的影响[J]. 种子科技, 2025, 43(20): 13-15.
|
|
[9]
|
章慧芬, 尹冬, 韩方仪, 等. 不同形态氮配比对烤烟农艺性状及产质量的影响[J]. 农业技术与装备, 2025(9): 176-178, 181.
|
|
[10]
|
张珂, 史小军, 刘璐, 等. 不同肥料配施对晒黄烟根际土壤细菌群落及产质量的影响[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2025(10): 29-35.
|
|
[11]
|
吕大树, 杨洋, 杨燕, 等. 有机肥施用量对烟草农艺性状及产质量的影响[J]. 植物医学, 2025, 4(2): 74-80.
|
|
[12]
|
王冰, 李金红, 周桂夙, 等. 不同土壤改良剂、施肥方式及留叶数对烤烟生长发育的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2025, 19(3): 17-23, 32.
|
|
[13]
|
农世英, 宋战峰, 张得平, 等. 烤烟专用有机-无机复混肥对烟草生长的影响[J]. 生物灾害科学, 2024, 47(3): 451-457.
|
|
[14]
|
陈小翔, 杨承, 贺帅, 等. 不同施肥方式对土壤理化性质和烟草生长的影响[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2024, 43(5): 26-31, 52.
|
|
[15]
|
罗优, 韩天华, 张雪奇, 等. 有机肥施肥方式和配施减氮肥对烟草生长∙产量和质量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2023, 51(21): 157-160.
|
|
[16]
|
Budimir, A., Svitlica, B., Kiš, D., Lovrić, A. and Šarčević, H. (2019) Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization Rate and Type of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Agronomic and Morphological Traits of Flue-Cured Tobacco. Poljoprivreda, 25, 11-17.
|
|
[17]
|
Zou, C., Pearce, R.C., Grove, J.H. and Coyne, M.S. (2016) No-Tillage Culture and Nitrogen Fertilizer Management for Burley Tobacco Production. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 155, 599-612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[18]
|
张福光. 不同施肥水平条件下山地烟区烤烟物质积累和养分吸收规律研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022(19): 10-13.
|
|
[19]
|
尹光彬, 李攀, 黄敏, 等. 滴灌条件下常规烟草专用肥施用技术对烟叶的影响[J]. 云南农业, 2022(8): 71-74.
|
|
[20]
|
叶赟. 新型缓释钾肥对烟草钾营养调控与品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2022.
|
|
[21]
|
雷洋. 不同施肥处理对铁岭植烟土壤性状及烟草生长与品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2022.
|
|
[22]
|
张艳艳, 谢晏芬, 高斯源, 等. 烤烟施肥枪施肥效果初探[J]. 云南农业, 2022(3): 74-78.
|
|
[23]
|
周家新, 杨悦章, 陈建国, 等. 烟草免地膜漏斗式移栽适宜的施肥方法研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(19): 38-39.
|
|
[24]
|
徐锐, 李彬, 宋洪昌, 等. 生物有机-无机复合肥对烤烟农艺性状及经济性状的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2020(22): 16-17, 29.
|
|
[25]
|
曾成城, 苏天明, 苏利荣, 等. 不同施肥技术对烟草产量品质及效益的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(2): 104-107.
|
|
[26]
|
黄隆. 不同施肥处理对烤烟翠碧一号生长发育与产质量的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2019.
|
|
[27]
|
陈晨, 陈俊龙, 董昱恺, 等. 不同施肥方法对烤烟生长发育和产量、质量的影响[J]. 农业装备技术, 2019, 45(5): 28-33, 36.
|
|
[28]
|
Tian, F., Zhang, L., Niu, L., Fan, X., Han, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) Non-Targeted Metabolomics Reveals Tobacco Metabolites Associated with Roasted Tobacco Quality under Organic Substitution. Agronomy, 15, Article 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[29]
|
Jiang, Y., Gu, K., Song, L., Zhang, C., Liu, J., Chu, H., et al. (2025) Fertilization and Rotation Enhance Tobacco Yield by Regulating Soil Physicochemical and Microbial Properties. Soil and Tillage Research, 247, Article ID: 106364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[30]
|
Jiao, Y., Chen, Q., Guo, X., Li, H., Chen, X., Men, K., et al. (2024) Effect of Potassium Fulvate on Continuous Tobacco Cropping Soils and Crop Growth. Frontiers in Plant Science, 15, Article 1457793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[31]
|
王黎, 梁梅, 范江, 等. 缓/控释肥在烟草上的应用效果研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2018(24): 12, 14.
|
|
[32]
|
席奇亮. 基于水肥一体化技术的烤烟增产提质效应分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2018.
|
|
[33]
|
潘周云, 田景先, 陈杰, 等. 施肥量和密度对烤烟新品种NC102农艺性状及产质量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2018(1): 4-6.
|
|
[34]
|
周健飞, 彭玉富, 程玉渊, 等. 水肥一体化技术在南阳烟区的应用效果[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2017, 45(12): 72-76.
|
|
[35]
|
崔丙慧. 烟草增效提质减量化施肥技术研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2017, 23(11): 69, 91.
|
|
[36]
|
李鹏. 滴灌条件下不同配比水溶肥对烤烟产量及品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2017.
|
|
[37]
|
张为涛. 控释钾肥对小麦/玉米和烟草养分吸收、产量及土壤养分的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2017.
|
|
[38]
|
卫宣志. 水肥一体化条件下氮用量和施肥方式对烟草草品质及产量的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2017.
|
|
[39]
|
李世金, 谢强, 刘国侠, 等. 不同施肥水平对烟草生产的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2016, 22(23): 65-67.
|
|
[40]
|
何光道. 不同有机肥用量对土壤养分、烤烟农艺性状、产量及品质的影响[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2016.
|
|
[41]
|
王琪. 滴灌条件下烤烟水肥供应最佳时期及用量的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2016.
|
|
[42]
|
Liao, R., Dongchen, W., Lin, C., Liu, Z. and Mao, Z. (2026) Integrated Transcriptome and Metabolome Analysis Reveals the Mechanisms Underlying Yield Trends and Alterations in Seed Oil Composition of Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) under Paddy-Upland Rotation Systems. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 26, Article ID: 102705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[43]
|
Luo, C., Wang, X., Li, Y., Ding, H., Liu, T. and Dong, Y. (2024) Enhancing Soil Properties, Soil-Borne Diseases Control, and Quality through Selecting High C/N Agricultural Waste during Reductive Soil Disinfestation for Continuous Tobacco Cropping. Crop Protection, 180, Article ID: 106657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[44]
|
Gui, L., Xia, L., Yang, J., et al. (2023) Effects of Different Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Techniques on Flue-Cured Tobacco Production. Agricultural Biotechnology, 12, 48-51, 61.
|
|
[45]
|
Wang, Y., Liu, X., Di, H., He, X., Sun, Y., Xiang, S., et al. (2024) The Mechanism of Microbial Community Succession and Microbial Co-Occurrence Network in Soil with Compost Application. Science of the Total Environment, 906, Article ID: 167409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
|
|
[46]
|
Qin, F., Rao, D., Yu, H., Han, Y., Pan, G., Hu, Z., et al. (2023) Reductive Soil Disinfestation to Improve Soil Properties in Long-Term Tobacco Cultivation. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 69, 3284-3299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|