考虑ESG表现的企业供应商选择模型构建研究
Research on the Construction of a Supplier Selection Model Considering ESG Performance
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.156631, PDF,   
作者: 余俊雁, 张 浩*, 刘玉涵, 夏 楠:上海理工大学管理学院,上海;李文雯:上海理工大学机械学院,上海
关键词: 供应商选择ESGAHP-TOPSISDEA-Super SBM集成模型Supplier Selection ESG AHP-TOPSIS DEA-Super SBM Integrated Model
摘要: 在全球可持续发展与“双碳”战略驱动下,企业面临绿色转型压力,传统供应商选择体系因缺乏环境、社会及治理维度而难以识别供应链风险。针对此问题,本研究构建了融合经济可持续性与ESG的四维评价指标体系,并提出一种集成评价模型。该模型分别运用AHP-TOPSIS方法评估供应商综合表现,以及DEA-Super SBM模型测度其运营效率,通过集成两种结果形成最终决策依据。研究结果表明,这种集成模型更适合于对供应商进行评估,准确识别并排序供应商,更适用于推动可持续供应链管理的发展。
Abstract: Driven by global sustainable development and the “Dual Carbon” strategy, enterprises face increasing pressure for green transformation. However, traditional supplier selection systems struggle to effectively identify supply chain risks due to the lack of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions. To address this issue, this study constructs a four-dimensional evaluation index system integrating economic sustainability with ESG factors and proposes an integrated evaluation model. Specifically, the model utilizes the AHP-TOPSIS method to evaluate the comprehensive performance of suppliers and the DEA-Super SBM model to measure their operational efficiency, integrating the results from both approaches to form the final basis for decision-making. The results demonstrate that this integrated model is more suitable for supplier assessment, as it accurately identifies and ranks suppliers, thereby effectively promoting the development of sustainable supply chain management.
文章引用:余俊雁, 张浩, 李文雯, 刘玉涵, 夏楠. 考虑ESG表现的企业供应商选择模型构建研究[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(6): 248-257. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.156631

参考文献

[1] Karami, S., Ghasemy Yaghin, R. and Mousazadegan, F. (2020) Supplier Selection and Evaluation in the Garment Supply Chain: An Integrated DEA-PCA-VIKOR Approach. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 112, 578-595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Zhang, H., Wei, G. and Chen, X. (2022) SF-GRA Method Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making and Its Application to Emergency Supplies Supplier Selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 110, Article 104679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Govindan, K., Rajendran, S., Sarkis, J. and Murugesan, P. (2015) Multi Criteria Decision Making Approaches for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection: A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 98, 66-83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Noci, G. (1997) Designing ‘Green’ Vendor Rating Systems for the Assessment of a Supplier’s Environmental Performance. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3, 103-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Chiu, M.C., Tai, P.Y. and Chu, C.Y. (2024) Developing a Smart Green Supplier Risk Assessment System Integrating Natural Language Processing and Life Cycle Assessment Based on AHP Framework: An Empirical Study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 207, Article 107671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Wang, X., Liu, Z., Kong, H. and Peng, G. (2023) Research on the Evaluation of Green Suppliers of High Energy-Consuming Enterprises—Based on Rough Number-Grey Correlation TOPSIS Method. Heliyon, 10, e21700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Freeman, J. and Chen, T. (2015) Green Supplier Selection Using an AHP-Entropy-TOPSIS Framework. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20, 327-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 宋媛媛, 黄江龙. 基于AHP法的建筑项目绿色设备供应商评价选择研究[J]. 绿色科技, 2023, 25(14): 211-216.
[9] Haeri, S.A.S. and Rezaei, J. (2019) A Grey-Based Green Supplier Selection Model for Uncertain Environments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 768-784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Yan, X., Bao, X., Zhao, R. and Li, F. (2022) Performance Measurement for Green Supplier Selection Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 45960-45970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 潘雨红, 詹翌, 马旭. 基于DEMATEL-BP的装配式住宅预制构件供应商选择的影响因素识别[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2017, 47(9): 22-34.
[12] Mahmoudi, A., Abbasi, M. and Deng, X. (2022) Evaluating the Performance of the Suppliers Using Hybrid DEA-OPA Model: A Sustainable Development Perspective. Group Decision and Negotiation, 31, 335-362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Zhou, X., Pedrycz, W., Kuang, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2016) Type-2 Fuzzy Multi-Objective DEA Model: An Application to Sustainable Supplier Evaluation. Applied Soft Computing, 46, 424-440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Saaty, T.L. (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.
[15] Hwang, C.L., and Yoon, K. (1981) Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. Springer, 58-191.
[16] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978) Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Tone, K. (2001) A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498-509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Tone, K. (2002) A Slacks-Based Measure of Super-Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 32-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef