基于岩石硬度与钻井参数的钻头磨损预测模型
A Prediction Model for Bit Wear Based on Rock Hardness and Drilling Parameters
DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2026.482021, PDF,   
作者: 黄 浩, 刘 宇:中法渤海地质服务有限公司海南分公司,海南 海口;朱茂勋, 李皇艺*, 苏 鲜:武汉时代地智科技股份有限公司,湖北 武汉
关键词: 岩性莫氏硬度钻井参数钻具磨损矿物加权法多元回归Lithological Mohs Hardness Drilling Parameters Drill Tool Wear Mineral-Weighted Method Multiple Regression
摘要: 钻具磨损是钻井工程中影响施工效率与作业成本的关键因素,其磨损程度受岩石磨蚀性与钻井参数的共同影响。在影响岩石磨蚀性的诸多因素中,矿物硬度是本质性指标,莫氏硬度作为矿物硬度的分级标准,对钻具磨损具有重要控制作用,但现有研究对二者在磨损过程中的耦合机制关注不足。为此,本文以岩性莫氏硬度为核心因子,采用矿物加权平均法量化地层整体莫氏硬度,分析不同莫氏硬度等级下钻具磨损类型与磨损速率的变化特征,在此基础上引入钻压、转速、扭矩等关键钻井参数,构建考虑莫氏硬度与钻井参数交互影响的钻具磨损多元回归评估模型。利用某油田5口井的856组现场数据进行验证,结果表明,该模型对钻具磨损等级的预测准确率(误差 ≤ 1级)为82.5%,决定系数R2为0.79。本研究为钻井过程中钻具磨损预测与钻井参数优化提供了可量化的评估方法。
Abstract: Drill tool wear is a critical factor affecting drilling efficiency and operational cost. The degree of wear is jointly influenced by rock abrasiveness and drilling parameters. Among the factors controlling rock abrasiveness, mineral hardness is a fundamental property, and Mohs hardness, as a standardized scale of mineral hardness, plays a key role in drill tool wear. However, the coupling mechanism between Mohs hardness and drilling parameters in the wear process remains underexplored. In this study, Mohs hardness is taken as the core factor. A mineral-weighted average method is adopted to quantify the overall Mohs hardness of the formation. The variation patterns of wear type and wear rate under different Mohs hardness levels are analyzed. On this basis, key drilling parameters including weight on bit, rotational speed, and torque are incorporated, and a multiple regression model considering the interaction between Mohs hardness and drilling parameters is established. The model is validated using 856 sets of field data from five wells in a certain oilfield. Results show that the prediction accuracy of wear grade (error ≤ 1 grade) reaches 82.5%, with an R2 of 0.79. This study provides a quantifiable evaluation method for drill tool wear prediction and drilling parameter optimization.
文章引用:黄浩, 刘宇, 朱茂勋, 李皇艺, 苏鲜. 基于岩石硬度与钻井参数的钻头磨损预测模型[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2026, 48(2): 188-196. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2026.482021

参考文献

[1] 王猛, 齐吉琳, 皮进, 等. 基于矿物加权硬度确定岩石磨蚀性的试验研究[J]. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2023, 21(3): 99-104.
[2] 刘刚, 陈勇, 赵伟. 钻具磨损评估方法研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 钻采工艺, 2021, 44(3): 1-5.
[3] Yılmaz, N.G. (2011) Abrasivity Assessment of Granitic Building Stones in Relation to Diamond Tool Wear Rate Using Mineralogy-Based Rock Hardness Indexes. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 44, 725-733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Yaralı, O., Yaşar, E., Bacak, G. and Ranjith, P.G. (2008) A Study of Rock Abrasivity and Tool Wear in Coal Measures Rocks. International Journal of Coal Geology, 74, 53-66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 张厚美, 刘国华, 王永东. 基于TBM施工的隧道岩石耐磨性与莫氏硬度的关系研究[J]. 公路交通科技(应用技术版), 2010, 6(5): 127-130.
[6] Hareland, G., Wu, A. and Rashidi, B. (2010) A Drilling Rate Model for Roller Cone Bits and Its Application. International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, June 2010, SPE-129592-MS. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Mazen, A.Z., Rahmanian, N., Mujtaba, I. and Hassanpour, A. (2021) Prediction of Penetration Rate for PDC Bits Using Indices of Rock Drillability, Cuttings Removal, and Bit Wear. SPE Drilling & Completion, 36, 320-337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 马涛, 张超, 王巍, 等. 涠西南凹陷基于机械比能的钻头磨损评价方法[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2024, 44(1): 78-81.
[9] 孟晗, 张振鑫, 韩学银, 等. 融合钻头磨损与预训练机制的机械钻速预测方法研究[J]. 石油科学通报, 2025, 10(5): 1030-1042.
[10] Yan, Z., Fan, H., Song, X., et al. (2024) Wear Prediction of Polycrystalline Diamond Compact Bits in Sandstone and Mudstone Formations Based on Gaussian Process Regression. SPE Journal, 29, 6605-6622.
[11] Prakash, S. (2024) A Review on Tool Life in Coal Measures Rocks. Journal of Mines, Metals and Fuels, 72, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Plinninger, R.J., Spaun, G. and Thuro, K. (2002) Predicting Tool Wear in Drill and Blast. Tunnels & Tunnelling International, 34, 38-41.
[13] Alber, M. (2008) Stress Dependency of the Cerchar Abrasivity Index (CAI) and Its Effects on Wear of Selected Rock Cutting Tools. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 23, 351-359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef