计及阶梯式碳交易与需求响应的工业用户共享储能低碳经济调度
Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch of Shared Energy Storage for Industrial Users Considering Tiered Carbon Trading and Demand Response
摘要: 针对工业园区分布式可再生能源渗透率提升带来的调度挑战,文章提出了一种计及阶梯式碳交易与需求响应的工业用户共享储能低碳经济调度策略。首先,挖掘工业集群内部不同主体的用能异质性,利用各主体间净负荷的时空互补优势,构建了共享储能运行框架,以实现储能资源的集约化配置。其次,引入阶梯式碳交易机制作为引导系统减排的经济杠杆,并结合柔性需求响应机制,建立了源–荷–储协同优化调度模型,通过二次型平滑惩罚项约束负荷转移过程,保障生产连续性。再者,揭示了系统在阶梯碳价与分时电价等复杂约束下的低碳博弈机理,通过储能时空平移与负荷柔性重塑的深度耦合,实现碳排放与能量消耗的精准对齐,规避高额碳惩罚;并借助关键参数灵敏度分析,量化评估了所提策略在不同碳价与需求响应参与度下的适应性与降本效能。最后,以江苏省某工业园区为算例进行仿真验证。结果表明,所提策略通过共享模式使储能总规划容量由4233.81 kWh降低至2781.95 kWh,降幅达34.29%。在阶梯碳交易与价格信号的引导下,柔性负荷全天累计平移电量达925.42 kWh,实现了向夜间风电出力高峰等低碳时段的平滑平移,使集群净负荷的峰谷差由222.6 kW大幅收窄至76.7 kW,降幅达65.5%。在微观企业层面,系统总碳排放量由17.85吨降至15.57吨,下降12.77%,总运行成本由13540.20元优化至13394.98元,验证了所提策略在提升系统经济性与低碳治理水平方面的有效性。
Abstract: To address the scheduling challenges arising from the increasing penetration of distributed renewable energy in industrial parks, a low-carbon economic dispatch strategy for industrial users considering stepped carbon trading and demand response is proposed based on shared energy storage. First, by exploiting the energy-use heterogeneity of different entities within the industrial cluster and leveraging the spatiotemporal complementarity advantages of their net loads, a shared energy storage operational framework is constructed to achieve centralized configuration of energy storage resources. Second, the stepped carbon trading mechanism is introduced as an economic lever to guide system emission reduction, and combined with a flexible demand response mechanism, a source-load-storage collaborative optimal dispatch model is established, where a quadratic smoothing penalty term is employed to constrain the load shifting process and ensure production continuity. Then, the low-carbon gaming mechanism of the system under complex constraints, such as stepped carbon prices and time-of-use electricity prices, is revealed. Through the deep coupling of the spatiotemporal shifting of energy storage and the flexible reshaping of loads, precise alignment between carbon emissions and energy consumption is achieved, thereby avoiding high carbon penalties; furthermore, sensitivity analysis of key parameters is conducted to quantitatively evaluate the adaptability and cost-reduction effectiveness of the proposed strategy under different carbon prices and demand response participation levels. Finally, a case study simulation is conducted on an industrial park in Jiangsu Province. The results demonstrate that the proposed strategy reduces the total planned energy storage capacity from 4233.81 kWh to 2781.95 kWh through the shared mode, representing a reduction of 34.29%. Guided by stepped carbon trading and price signals, a cumulative total of 925.42 kWh of flexible load is shifted throughout the day. This realizes a smooth load shift toward low-carbon periods, such as the peak nighttime wind power output, thereby significantly narrowing the peak-to-valley difference of the cluster net load from 222.6 kW to 76.7 kW, yielding a 65.5% decrease. At the micro-enterprise level, the total system carbon emissions are reduced from 17.85 tons to 15.57 tons, yielding a 12.77% decrease, and the total operating cost is optimized from 13540.20 CNY to 13394.98 CNY. These findings verify the effectiveness of the proposed strategy in enhancing both the economic efficiency and the low-carbon operational management of the system.
文章引用:黄艳琴, 邵一帆, 郭磊, 孙乐怡, 马艺菲, 危洋岳, 陈昕洋, 陆强. 计及阶梯式碳交易与需求响应的工业用户共享储能低碳经济调度[J]. 智能电网, 2026, 16(3): 67-79. https://doi.org/10.12677/sg.2026.163008

参考文献

[1] 梁作放, 孔令勃, 潘华. 新型电力系统面临的挑战及关键技术[J]. 电力与能源, 2024, 45(2): 154-159.
[2] 吴放. 广东“十四五”电源结构分析与优化探讨研究[J]. 中国能源, 2021, 43(12): 64-73.
[3] 刘笑乐, 李琼. 中国能源安全条件下的清洁能源供需平衡统计分析[J]. 能源与节能, 2024(8): 1-5+210.
[4] 李建林, 马会萌, 惠东. 储能技术融合分布式可再生能源的现状及发展趋势[J]. 电工技术学报, 2016, 31(14): 1-10+20.
[5] 吴剑威, 邵振国, 陈昌铭, 等. 基于改进贝叶斯算法的新能源电站共享储能混合套餐定价优化[J/OL]. 电网技术, 1-18. 2026-05-10.[CrossRef
[6] 曾佑鑫, 李华强, 魏震波, 等. 考虑电-热-气负荷联动的园区多能源云储能服务运营策略[J]. 电力建设, 2026, 47(2): 174-187.
[7] 王亚武, 黄淳驿, 王承民, 等. 市场环境下考虑全周期经济效益的工业园区共享储能优化配置[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2024, 48(10): 129-138.
[8] 温港成, 石鑫, 张怡, 等. 考虑设备变工况特性的园区综合能源系统两阶段规划优化方法研究[J]. 综合智慧能源, 2022, 44(10): 1-11.
[9] 王若愚, 蔡京陶, 叶键民, 等. 粤港澳大湾区电力互联规划研究[J]. 电工技术, 2023(24): 186-188.
[10] 齐彩娟, 靳盘龙, 杨燕, 等. 计及碳定价的新型电力系统容量优化配置研究[J]. 电网技术, 2025, 49(2): 613-621.
[11] 章攀钊, 谢丽蓉, 马瑞真, 等. 考虑电动汽车集群可调度能力的多主体两阶段低碳优化运行策略[J]. 电网技术, 2022, 46(12): 4809-4825.
[12] 崔杨, 曾鹏, 仲悟之, 等. 考虑阶梯式碳交易的电-气-热综合能源系统低碳经济调度[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2021, 41(3): 10-17.
[13] 奚孟飞. 低压侧资源参与区域电力市场的协调机制探析[J]. 电工材料, 2024(6): 69-71.
[14] 谢剑明, 孙志杰. 南方区域电力现货市场分析与展望[J]. 能源科技, 2024, 22(2): 36-39.
[15] 何慧梅, 孙晓宁. 区域电力现货市场交易机制评价方法应用研究[J]. 大众标准化, 2024(7): 134-136.
[16] 程韧俐, 周保荣, 史军, 等. 面向区域统一电力市场的超大城市虚拟电厂关键技术研究综述[J]. 南方电网技术, 2023, 17(4): 90-100+31.
[17] 杨燕, 金楚, 程鑫, 等. 基于大湾区外环的柔性直流互联方案[J]. 南方电网技术, 2021, 15(3): 15-21.
[18] 余贻鑫, 孙冰, 秦超, 等. 互联电力系统中高比例风电和太阳能光伏的开发与消纳模式研究[J]. 南方电网技术, 2017, 11(10): 10-18.
[19] 段钇江, 侯显鑫, 吴光耀. 考虑收益的水-风-光多能互补清洁能源送出方案分析[J]. 电力系统及其自动化学报, 2025, 37(2): 115-121.
[20] 杨冬锋, 刘厚伟, 孙勇, 等. 考虑绿证交易机制与碳捕集电厂深度调峰补偿的多主体联合调峰优化调度[J]. 电网技术, 2024, 48(1): 100-112.
[21] 李军祥, 刘艳丽, 何建佳, 等. 考虑绿证和碳排放权交易的电力市场协同减碳效应与仿真[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2024, 46(4): 464-474.
[22] 李家桐, 谢宁, 王承民, 等. 基于CHP机组碳排放分析的综合能源系统低碳调度优化方法[J]. 智慧电力, 2024, 52(6): 31-37+83.
[23] 王秋杰, 亓浩, 谭洪, 等. 考虑碳市场风险的热电联产虚拟电厂低碳调度[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2024, 44(10): 8-15.
[24] 马成元, 陈皓勇, 肖东亮. 考虑碳约束的新型电力系统跨区域优化调度研究[J]. 智慧电力, 2024, 52(6): 38-45.
[25] 邹晨露, 崔雪, 周斌, 等. 低碳环境下计及柔性负荷和电锅炉的电热联合系统优化调度[J]. 电测与仪表, 2019, 56(18): 34-40+56.
[26] 颜俊, 罗宇杰, 颜安, 等. 计及用户响应特性的电动汽车充电站设备优化配置方法[J]. 中国电力, 2025, 58(4): 140-147.
[27] 恩格贝, 张岩, 田冰颖. 考虑独立型源网荷储一体化系统成本的峰谷电价优化模型[J]. 山东电力技术, 2023, 50(11): 42-50.
[28] 张翰林, 汪睿哲, 刘友波, 等. 考虑源荷碳势耦合的电力系统双层低碳经济调度[J]. 电力建设, 2023, 44(12): 28-42.