认罪认罚“可以型”从宽模式研究
Study on the Lenient Mode of “Permissive Model” in the Guilty Plea and Accept Punishment System
摘要: 2018年《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》正式确立的认罪认罚“可以型”从宽模式,是关于认罪认罚与从宽处理之间复杂关系的深刻理解与重新诠释。认罪认罚从宽制度的适用促进诉讼领域的发展,但具体分析“可以型”从宽模式,梳理规制现状后发现,在司法实践的操作中,仍然存在内涵模糊导致适用案件不明确、量刑规范化程度不足、从宽处理权利难以保障和加剧公权力行使与被害方利益保障的冲突等问题。基于此,从“可以型”从宽模式的内涵逻辑体系出发,利用语义分析法研究“可以型”从宽模式的内涵,在现行司法解释理论依据的基础上,明确当前模式的困境和现实障碍,从而提出优化认罪认罚从宽情节、设计科学化从宽处罚的量刑原则、强化当事人的权利保障、规范司法机关量刑建议权和刑罚裁量权的适用等相关建议,进一步拓宽“可以型”从宽模式的发展,深化认罪认罚从宽模式的价值。
Abstract: The lenient mode of “permissive model” in the guilty plea and accept punishment system established in the Criminal Procedure Law in 2018 is a profound understanding and reinterpretation of the complex relationship between guilty plea and leniency. The application of leniency system of guilty plea promotes the development of the litigation field. However, after a specific analysis of the “permissive model” and the review of the current regulatory situation, it is found that there are still some problems in judicial practice, such as ambiguous connotation leading to unclear applicable cases, insufficient standardization of sentencing, difficult to protect the right of leniency and aggravating the conflict between the exercise of public power and the protection of the interests of the victim. Based on this, starting from the connotation logic system of “permissive model”, this paper studies the connotation of “permissive model” by using semantic analysis method, and clarifies the predicament and practical obstacles of the current model on the basis of the current theoretical basis of judicial interpretation. Therefore, the author puts forward relevant suggestions such as optimizing the circumstances of leniency of guilty plea, designing the sentencing principle of scientific leniency, strengthening the protection of the rights of the parties, standardizing the application of the sentencing suggestion power and penalty discretion power of the judicial organs, further broadening the development of the lenient mode of “permissive model” and deepening the value of the lenient mode of guilty plea.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
单锋, 姚杏. 认罪认罚从宽的刑事实体内涵辨析[J]. 学海, 2022(1): 178-185.
|
|
[2]
|
陈光中. 刑事诉讼法学[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021.
|
|
[3]
|
孙长永. 认罪认罚从宽制度的基本内涵[J]. 中国法学, 2019(3): 204-222.
|
|
[4]
|
陈瑞华. “认罪认罚从宽”改革的理论反思——基于刑事速裁程序运行经验的考察[J]. 当代法学, 2016, 30(4): 3-13.
|
|
[5]
|
张斌. “一般应当”之“应当”与否——兼论《刑事诉讼法》第201条的理解与调整[J]. 中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 36(2): 112-121.
|
|
[6]
|
姜远斌, 缪淑妮, 王圣斌. 重罪案件适用认罪认罚从宽制度的实践困境及完善路径[J]. 山东警察学院学报, 2023, 35(1): 57-62.
|
|
[7]
|
劳佳琦. 量刑的法外因素与量刑规范化改革[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(2): 91-107.
|
|
[8]
|
高亦陈. 认罪认罚精准化量刑建议之困境与优化路径[J]. 湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版), 2023, 20(7): 78-83.
|
|
[9]
|
赵恒. 认罪认罚案件被追诉人合作理论研究[J]. 中国应用法学, 2023(3): 103-117.
|
|
[10]
|
苏永生, 赵晓媛. 重罪、轻罪和微罪的划分问题研究[J]. 武汉科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(1): 71-83.
|
|
[11]
|
刘传稿. 轻重犯罪分离治理的体系化建构[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2022(4): 12-27.
|
|
[12]
|
郑英龙. 认罪认罚“程序从宽”的理论反思[J]. 政法论坛, 2024, 42(4): 39-51.
|
|
[13]
|
李振杰. 困境与出路: 认罪认罚从宽制度下的量刑建议精准化[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2021, 24(1): 139-152.
|
|
[14]
|
任建华, 侯竣泰. 论轻罪治理视域下认罪认罚中的承认标准[J]. 山东社会科学, 2024(10): 183-192.
|
|
[15]
|
敦宁. 认罪认罚从宽制度的刑法回应[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2022(5): 81-93.
|