电商平台自治的法律规制
Legal Regulation of E-Commerce Platform Self-Governance
DOI: 10.12677/ecl.2026.156643, PDF,   
作者: 龙 洋:贵州大学法学院,贵阳 贵州
关键词: 平台自治私权力法律规制Platform Self-Governance Private Power Legal Regulation
摘要: 随着数字经济的快速发展,电商平台自治已成为网络交易治理的核心机制,其本质是平台依托技术与市场优势形成的私权力,兼具提升交易效率的内生价值与补充公权监管的治理功能。然而实践中,平台自治权呈现无序扩张态势,规则制定单边化、惩戒权行使恣意化、纠纷裁决倾斜化等权力滥用行为频发,严重侵害平台内用户的合法权益。我国现行立法仅对平台自治作出原则性规定,司法实践亦缺乏统一的合法性审查标准,平台自治的边界问题已成为数字经济法治建设的核心议题。本文首先阐释了电商平台自治的正当性基础与生成动因,系统梳理了平台准立法权、准行政权、准司法权滥用的实践样态与法律困境,最终从规范平台三类核心自治权、构建多元协同治理体系等维度,提出了平台自治法律规制的完善路径,旨在划定平台私权力的合法行使边界,实现平台、平台内经营者与消费者三方权益的均衡保护。
Abstract: With the rapid development of the digital economy, self-governance of e-commerce platforms has become the core mechanism of online transaction governance. Its essence is the private power formed by platforms relying on technological and market advantages, which embodies both the intrinsic value of improving transaction efficiency and the governance function of supplementing public regulation. In practice, however, platform self-governance power has been expanding disorderly. Abuses of power such as unilateral rule-making, arbitrary exercise of disciplinary power and biased dispute adjudication occur frequently, seriously infringing upon the legitimate rights and interests of on-platform users. China’s current legislation only provides principled provisions for platform self-governance, and judicial practice lacks unified standards for legality review. The issue of the boundary of platform self-governance has thus become a core topic in the legal construction of the digital economy. This paper first elaborates on the legitimate basis and formative causes of e-commerce platform self-governance, and systematically sorts out the practical manifestations and legal dilemmas of the abuse of platforms’ quasi-legislative, quasi-administrative and quasi-judicial powers. Finally, from the perspectives of regulating the three core types of self-governance power and building a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance system, it proposes approaches to improving the legal regulation of platform self-governance, so as to define the legitimate boundaries for the exercise of platform private power and realize the balanced protection of the rights and interests of platforms, on-platform operators and consumers.
文章引用:龙洋. 电商平台自治的法律规制[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(6): 360-367. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.156643

参考文献

[1] 杨立新. 网络交易法律关系构造[J]. 中国社会科学, 2016(2): 114-137+206-207.
[2] 孙晋, 聂童. 电商平台自治权滥用的分权化治理——基于平台内经营主体权益保护的视角[J]. 河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2026, 51(2): 129-140.
[3] 刘浩然. 论网络平台规则效力的司法审查[J]. 行政法学研究, 2023(3): 141-152.
[4] 罗英, 谷雨. 网络平台自治规则的治理逻辑[J]. 学习与实践, 2021(8): 35-44.
[5] 王迪. 平台自治权的滥用与矫正[J]. 安徽大学学报(哲社版), 2025, 49(1): 123-131.
[6] 高俊杰. 电商平台自我规制的社会公权力属性及问责路径[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2025, 31(6): 187-202.
[7] 马治国, 占妮. 数字社会背景下超级平台私权力的法律规制[J]. 北京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(2): 115-131.
[8] 朱家路. 虚拟财产视野下平台权力的规范路径——基于20份平台服务协议的实证研究[J]. 天府新论, 2024(3): 101-121+159.
[9] 李小伶. 电子商务平台规范商家自律行为的策略研究[M]. 湖北: 武汉大学出版社, 2016: 34.
[10] 林建宗. 平台型电子商务中的私人秩序研究[M]. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 2019: 96.
[11] 刘权. 网络平台的公共性及其实现——以电商平台的法律规制为视角[J]. 法学研究, 2020, 42(2): 42-56.
[12] 张钦昱. 电子商务平台治理的理念转型与制度调适[J]. 法学评论, 2025, 43(6): 145-156.
[13] 刘冰. 论数据资产化的法律障碍及破解路径[J]. 中国法律评论, 2023(2): 51-63.
[14] 黄绍坤. 平台规则的合法性控制[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 25(5): 140-148.
[15] 夏燕. 网络社区自治规则探究——以“新浪微博”规则考察为基础[J]. 重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 29(4): 51-57.
[16] 解志勇, 修青华. 互联网治理视域中的平台责任研究[J]. 国家行政学院学报, 2017(5): 102-106+147.
[17] 周莉欣. 电商平台自治法律机制的构建[J]. 法商研究, 2024, 41(2): 106-123.
[18] 刘权. 互联网平台处罚权的法律规制[J]. 法学研究, 2025, 47(3): 54-71.
[19] 刘展鹏. 超级数字平台私权力异化的形态表征、生成机理与治理路径[J]. 贵州大学学报(社会科学版), 2026, 44(1): 110-122.
[20] 王洪亮. 论平台第三方格式条款的效力[J]. 法律适用, 2026(3): 87-104.
[21] 姚辉, 阙梓冰. 电商平台中的自治与法治——兼议平台治理中的司法态度[J]. 求是学刊, 2020, 47(4): 90-102+2.