教学创新类型对本科生创新思维发展的影响研究
The Impact of Types of Instructional Innovation on the Development of Innovative Thinking among Undergraduate Students
DOI: 10.12677/ces.2026.146406, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 茅天羽, 付亦宁*:苏州大学教育学院,江苏 苏州
关键词: 教学创新本科生创新思维元分析 Instructional Innovation Undergraduate Students Innovative Thinking Meta-Analysis
摘要: 教学创新对本科生创新思维发展的作用日益受到关注,但不同类型教学创新的效果缺乏系统整合。研究采用元分析方法,纳入36项实证研究共66个效应量,以Hedges’s g为指标,考察教学创新的总体效应及调节作用。结果表明,教学创新对本科生创新思维有显著正向影响,总体效应值为0.857;焦点式创新与融合式创新均有显著促进作用,但差异不显著;文化背景调节效应显著,受儒家文化影响较深的教育情境效应量更高;学科领域仅在“创新倾向与成果”维度调节显著,人文社科高于自然科学;干预时长调节效应显著,效应量随时长递增。研究表明,教学创新对本科生创新思维具有稳定促进作用,效果受教学类型与文化情境影响。
Abstract: The role of instructional innovation in developing undergraduates’ innovative thinking has attracted growing attention, yet systematic integration of its varied effects remains lacking. This meta-analysis synthesizes 36 empirical studies comprising 66 effect sizes, using Hedges’s g to evaluate the overall effect and moderators. Results reveal a significant positive effect (g = 0.857). Both focused and integrated innovations yield significant gains, with no significant difference between them. Cultural context moderates the effect, with stronger effects in settings influenced by Confucian traditions. Discipline moderates only the “innovation propensity and outcomes” dimension, favoring humanities and social sciences. Intervention duration also moderates significantly, with effects increasing over time. The findings confirm that instructional innovation reliably enhances undergraduates’ innovative thinking, with effectiveness shaped by innovation type and cultural context.
文章引用:茅天羽, 付亦宁. 教学创新类型对本科生创新思维发展的影响研究[J]. 创新教育研究, 2026, 14(6): 80-94. https://doi.org/10.12677/ces.2026.146406

参考文献

[1] 国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年) [EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/201008/t20100802_93704.html, 2010-7-29.
[2] 中华人民共和国教育部. 教育部关于加快建设高水平本科教育全面提高人才培养能力的意见[EB/OL].
http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201810/t20181017_351887.html, 2018-10-17.
[3] Serdyukov, P. (2017) Innovation in Education: What Works, What Doesn’t, and What to Do about It? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10, 4-33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Styers, M.L., Van Zandt, P.A. and Hayden, K.L. (2018) Active Learning in Flipped Life Science Courses Promotes Development of Critical Thinking Skills. CBELife Sciences Education, 17, ar39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Wei, X., Wang, L., Lee, L. and Liu, R. (2025) The Effects of Generative AI on Collaborative Problem-Solving and Team Creativity Performance in Digital Story Creation: An Experimental Study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22, Article No. 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 雷浩, 李雪. 数字工具支持的教学对学生学习结果有何影响?——来自137项实验与准实验的元分析证据[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2022, 40(11): 92-109.
[7] 刘隽颖. 论大学创新教学的理论与实践特征[J]. 大学教育科学, 2016(2): 70-73+77.
[8] Bertrand, J.R. (2005) Can Individual Creativity Be Enhanced by Training? A Meta-Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California.
[9] Palmer, M.S. and Giering, J.A. (2023) Characterizing Pedagogical Innovation in Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 49, 453-473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Suyo-Vega, J.A., Fernández-Bedoya, V.H. and Meneses-La-Riva, M.E. (2024) Beyond Traditional Teaching: A Systematic Review of Innovative Pedagogical Practices in Higher Education. F1000Research, 13, Article No. 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Hmelo-Silver, C.E. (2004) Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Thomas, J.W. (2000) A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. Autodesk Foundation.
[13] Dalgarno, B. and Lee, M.J.W. (2009) What Are the Learning Affordances of 3‐D Virtual Environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 10-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Radu, I. (2014) Augmented Reality in Education: A Meta-Review and Cross-Media Analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18, 1533-1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Graf, L. (2014) Growing in a Niche: Dual Study Programs Contribute to Change in Higher Education in Germany.
https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/17869
[16] Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T. (1999) Making Cooperative Learning Work. Theory Into Practice, 38, 67-73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] 林琳, 董玉琦, 沈书生. 设计思维教学法的理念框架与支撑技术[J]. 现代远程教育研究, 2022, 34(4): 73-82.
[18] 朱红, 安栋. 教学行为对本科生创新能力影响的实证研究——基于理科与其他学科的比较[J]. 教育学术月刊, 2016(1): 81-89+98.
[19] Kim, K.H. (2009) Cultural Influence on Creativity: The Relationship between Asian Culture (Confucianism) and Creativity among Korean Educators. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 73-93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] 燕连福, 杨珂. 传承中华优秀传统文化的创新基因[J]. 马克思主义理论学科研究, 2026, 12(2): 27-37.
[21] Scott, G., Leritz, L.E. and Mumford, M.D. (2004) The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361-388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 于海琴, 贾梦媛, 李世伟. 大学教学创新的研究、测评与展望[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 41(1): 113-120.
[23] 洪艺敏. 构建“以学生为中心”的本科教学质量标准[J]. 中国大学教学, 2017(10): 88-91.
[24] 易海华. 教育科研成果推广应用的误区及对策思考[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2007(4): 16-20.
[25] 王洪才, 刘隽颖, 解德渤. 大学创新教学: 理念、特征与误区[J]. 中国大学教学, 2016(2): 19-23+47.
[26] Bartunek, J.M. and Moch, M.K. (1987) First-Order, Second-Order, and Third-Order Change and Organization Development Interventions: A Cognitive Approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 483-500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] 何克抗. 论创客教育与创新教育[J]. 教育研究, 2016, 37(4): 12-24+40.
[28] Amabile, T.M. (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Williams, F.E. (1980) Creativity Assessment Packet (CAP) Manual. D. O. K. Publishers.
[30] Scriven, M. (2008) A Summative Evaluation of RCT Methodology: & an Alternative Approach to Causal Research. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 5, 11-24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 约翰·哈蒂. 可见的学习——对800多项关于学业成就的元分析的综合报告[M]. 彭正梅, 等, 译. 北京: 教育科学出版社, 2015: 5.
[32] Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T. and Rothstein, H.R. (2009) Introduction to Meta‐Analysis. Wiley. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[33] Cohen, J. (1960) A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] [美]博伦斯坦, 等. Meta分析导论[M]. 李国春, 吴勉华, 余小金, 译. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 206.
[35] Egger, M., Smith, G.D., Schneider, M. and Minder, C. (1997) Bias in Meta-Analysis Detected by a Simple, Graphical Test. BMJ, 315, 629-634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Duval, S. and Tweedie, R. (2000) Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot-Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Piaget, J. (1952) The Origins of Intelligence in Children. International Universities Press.
[38] Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Sweller, J. (1988) Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[40] 李庆丰. 基于思维能力培养的大学教学方法变革与重构[J]. 教育科学, 2025, 41(5): 30-36.
[41] Baer, J. (2015) The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity. Roeper Review, 37, 165-178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[42] Li, L. and Wegerif, R. (2014) What Does It Mean to Teach Thinking in China? Challenging and Developing Notions of “Confucian Education”. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 11, 22-32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[43] Rose, L.H. and Lin, H. (1984) A Meta‐Analysis of Long‐Term Creativity Training Programs. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 11-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[44] 吴永和, 刘博文, 马晓玲. 技术支持型教学干预对学生计算思维培养的影响——基于37篇国际实证研究的元分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(6): 44-56.
[45] 钟柏昌, 刘晓凡. 跨学科创新能力培养的学理机制与模式重构[J]. 中国远程教育, 2021(10): 29-38, 77.
[46] McLean, S.F. (2016) Case-Based Learning and Its Application in Medical and Health-Care Fields: A Review of Worldwide Literature. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 3, S20377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] 秦瑾若, 傅钢善. STEM教育: 基于真实问题情景的跨学科式教育[J]. 中国电化教育, 2017(4): 67-74.
[48] 郑凯, 王莉萍. “生物统计与田间试验设计”教学改革探讨[J]. 教育教学论坛, 2022(39): 65-68.
[49] 谢梦, 童颖之. 跨学科与博士生培养: 美国顶尖研究型大学社科类人才培养研究[J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2022, 43(1): 96-107.