老龄化时代背景下居家养老服务合同法律研究
A Legal Study on Home-Based Elderly Care Service Contracts in the Context of Population Aging
摘要: 在我国深度老龄化社会持续推进的背景下,居家养老已成为覆盖人群最广、社会接受度最高的主流养老模式。伴随养老服务市场化、专业化水平不断提升,居家养老服务合同作为界定服务双方权利义务、分配服务风险、化解养老纠纷、保障老年人合法权益的核心法律工具,其制度完善程度直接关系养老服务行业规范化发展与老年友好型社会建设。然而在司法实践与行业运行中,居家养老服务合同仍面临人身属性特殊、与传统合同规则冲突、主体关系复杂、责任界定模糊、法律属性不清晰、法律适用混乱、合同订立与履行不规范等现实困境。本文以《民法典》《老年人权益保障法》为规范基础,对居家养老服务合同的内涵、法律属性、实践模式展开系统分析,针对人身属性冲突、主体责任不清、法律适用混乱、合同运行不规范四类突出问题,提出构建特殊合同规则、厘清多方权责边界、明确法律定位统一裁判标准、规范合同全流程管理的对应优化路径,推动居家养老服务合同制度走向体系化、法治化,为保障老年人享有安全、优质、有尊严的居家养老服务提供坚实的法治支撑。
Abstract: Amid the continuous advancement of a super-aged society in China, home-based elderly care has become the mainstream model with the widest population coverage and the highest social acceptance. As the marketization and professionalization of elderly care services continue to improve, the home-based elderly care service contract serves as a core legal instrument for defining the rights and obligations of both parties, allocating service risks, resolving elderly care disputes, and safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of older adults. The degree of institutional refinement of such contracts directly impacts the standardized development of the elderly care service industry and the construction of an age-friendly society. However, in judicial practice and industry operations, home-based elderly care service contracts still face practical dilemmas: the special personal nature of the services, conflicts with traditional contract rules, complex principal relationships, ambiguous liability demarcation, unclear legal attributes, chaotic legal application, and non-standardized contract formation and performance. Drawing upon the Civil Code and the Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the Elderly as normative foundations, this paper conducts a systematic analysis of the connotation, legal nature, and practical models of home-based elderly care service contracts. In response to four prominent issues—conflicts arising from personal attributes, unclear principal responsibilities, chaotic legal application, and non-standardized contract operations—this study proposes corresponding optimization pathways: constructing special contract rules, clarifying the boundaries of multi-party rights and responsibilities, establishing unified legal positioning and adjudication standards, and standardizing the full-process management of contracts. These measures aim to promote the systematization and legalization of the home-based elderly care service contract regime, thereby providing solid legal support for ensuring that older adults enjoy safe, high-quality, and dignified home-based elderly care services.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
宋溪玺. 我国政府购买居家养老服务困境及对策探析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西北大学, 2015.
|
|
[2]
|
胡建国. 安庆市农村居家养老模式解析[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2017(22): 172-174.
|
|
[3]
|
宋雪飞, 周军, 李放. 非营利组织居家养老服务供给: 模式、效用及策略——基于南京市的案例分析[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学), 2017, 54(2): 145-156.
|
|
[4]
|
任倩霄. 民法典视域下替代履行制度的解释论展开[J]. 法学论坛, 2022, 37(6): 148-158.
|
|
[5]
|
邹华, 马凤领. 养老机构服务纠纷的主要特点及其应对[J]. 老龄科学研究, 2014, 2(6): 11-19.
|
|
[6]
|
王利明. 合同法[M]. 第3版. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2024.
|
|
[7]
|
司丹. 居家养老服务合同的法律规制[J]. 世纪桥, 2019(8): 74-75+90.
|
|
[8]
|
朱广新. 论监护委托下被监护人致人损害的责任承担[J]. 法律适用, 2023(6): 24-34.
|
|
[9]
|
杨立新. 侵权责任法[M]. 第5版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2025.
|
|
[10]
|
苏炜杰. 论居家养老服务中的政府担保责任[J]. 南开学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024(2): 24-41.
|