算法推荐在“网络舆论审判”形成中的作用机理研究
Research on the Mechanism of Algorithm Recommendation in the Formation of “Internet Public Opinion Trial”
DOI: 10.12677/jc.2026.146152, PDF,   
作者: 闫 琳:河北师范大学新闻传播学院,河北 石家庄
关键词: 算法推荐网络舆论审判认知极化Algorithmic Recommendation Online Public Opinion Trial Cognitive Polarization
摘要: 随着算法推荐成为社交媒体信息分发的核心机制,其在提升信息获取效率的同时,也带来了“信息茧房”与“认知极化”等结构性风险,并对公共舆论形态产生了深远影响。本研究旨在系统阐释算法推荐机制如何通过强化信息茧房与加剧认知极化,从而在“网络舆论审判”的形成、传播与放大过程中扮演关键角色。本文的核心贡献在于,揭示了算法推荐并非中立技术工具,而是作为“结构性加速器”和“扭曲性放大器”,系统性地改变了舆论审判的规模、速度与强度,对司法权威、个体权利与社会共识构成了严峻挑战。最后,论文从算法伦理、平台治理与媒介素养教育等维度提出了规制与反思路径。
Abstract: As algorithmic recommendation becomes the core mechanism for information distribution on social media, it not only enhances the efficiency of information acquisition but also introduces structural risks such as “information cocoons” and “cognitive polarization”, profoundly influencing the formation of public discourse. This study aims to systematically elucidate how algorithmic recommendation mechanisms play a pivotal role in the formation, dissemination, and amplification of “online public opinion trials” by reinforcing information cocoons and exacerbating cognitive polarization. The core contribution of this paper lies in revealing that algorithmic recommendation is not a neutral technological tool, but rather functions as a “structural accelerator” and a “distorting amplifier”. It systematically alters the scale, speed, and intensity of public opinion trials, posing serious challenges to judicial authority, individual rights, and social consensus. Finally, the paper proposes regulatory and reflective pathways from the dimensions of algorithmic ethics, platform governance, and media literacy education.
文章引用:闫琳. 算法推荐在“网络舆论审判”形成中的作用机理研究[J]. 新闻传播科学, 2026, 14(6): 184-192. https://doi.org/10.12677/jc.2026.146152

参考文献

[1] Nnenna, U.J. (2024) Media Trials: The Intersection of Law and Public Opinion. IDOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 9, 14-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 唐纳德·吉尔摩, 杰罗姆·巴龙, 托德·西蒙, 等. 美国大众传播法: 判例评析[M]. 梁宁, 译. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010: 355.
[3] 慕明春. “媒介审判”的机理与对策[J]. 现代传播, 2005(1): 64-66.
[4] [美]尼葛洛庞帝. 数字化生存[M]. 胡泳, 范海燕, 译. 海口: 海南出版社, 1997.
[5] [美]凯斯·R·桑斯坦. 信息乌托邦[M]. 毕竞悦, 译. 北京: 法律出版社, 2008.
[6] 彭兰. 导致信息茧房的多重因素及“破茧”路径[J]. 新闻界, 2020(1): 30-38+73.
[7] 方师师, 周远静. “姿态性”公开?——六大网络平台算法信息公开的比较研究[J]. 青年记者, 2026(1): 90-96.
[8] 仝鑫, 夏天, 杨孟辉, 等. 大语言模型的事实性问题研究: 评估、增强和展望[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2025, 48(7): 81-93.