数字技术赋能城市韧性治理的过程机理:基于G市的政策文本分析
The Process Mechanism of Digital Technology-Enabled Urban Resilience Governance: A Policy Text Analysis Based on City G
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.156465, PDF,    国家社会科学基金支持
作者: 张 晴, 赵圆月:华南农业大学公共管理学院,广东 广州
关键词: 数字治理气候韧性超大城市政策文本分析Digital Governance Climate Resilience Megacity Policy Text Analysis
摘要: 全球气候变暖背景下,极端天气事件呈现持续性、复合性与群发性特征,对超大城市的正常运转与安全发展构成严峻挑战。数字技术如何作用于城市气候韧性治理,成为当前城市治理研究的重要议题。本文基于技术治理与复杂系统理论,构建“技术创新–资源优化–体系再造–模式变革”的分析框架,选取G市2014~2024年间气候韧性治理政策文本,运用NVivo软件进行内容编码与耦合分析,探究智慧治理赋能超大城市气候韧性的过程机制。研究发现:其一,G市的数字技术利用已实现代际更新,物联网、大数据、人工智能等新一代数字技术深度嵌入城市治理;其二,数字赋能韧性治理的全过程呈现“重监测预警、轻响应恢复”的结构性失衡,技术嵌入存在显著的环节差异;其三,数字赋能仍以技术工具的初阶应用为主,技术–组织–制度互构效应尚未充分显现。研究认为,应以气候韧性建设作为宜居韧性智慧城市建设的跃升路径,通过强化跨系统全要素耦合、补齐响应恢复系统数字赋能短板、探索与数字技术适配的运行机制,实现超大城市气候韧性治理的系统性跃升。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of global warming, extreme weather events are exhibiting persistent, compound, and clustered characteristics, posing severe challenges to megacities. How digital technology functions in urban climate resilience governance has become a crucial topic in urban governance research. Based on theories of technological governance and complex systems, this study constructs an analytical framework of “technological innovation-resource optimization-system restructuring-model transformation,” and employs NVivo to code and analyze climate resilience governance policy texts of City G from 2014 to 2024. The findings indicate that: first, City G has achieved generational transformation in digital technology application; second, digitally enabled resilience governance demonstrates a structural imbalance emphasizing monitoring and early warning while neglecting response and recovery; third, digital governance still primarily relies on initial application of technological tools, and the interactive transformation among technology, organization, and institutions has not been fully realized. This study contends that climate resilience building should be positioned as a strategic pathway for advancing livable, resilient, and smart city development. Achieving a systemic leap in climate resilience governance in megacities requires stronger coupling among cross-system governance elements, enhanced digital empowerment of response and recovery systems, and the establishment of operational mechanisms that are better aligned with digital technologies.
文章引用:张晴, 赵圆月. 数字技术赋能城市韧性治理的过程机理:基于G市的政策文本分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(6): 190-199. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.156465

参考文献

[1] IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[2] 宋蕾. 智能与韧性是否兼容?——智慧城市建设的韧性评价和发展路径[J]. 社会科学, 2020(3): 21-32.
[3] 戴建华. 智慧政府视野下的治理能力现代化[J]. 理论与改革, 2020(4): 126-138.
[4] Holling, C.S. (1973) Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 张海波, 童星. 中国应急管理效能的生成机制[J]. 中国社会科学, 2022(4): 64-82+205-206.
[6] Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T. and Rockström, J. (2010) Resilience Thinking: Integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. Ecology and Society, 15, Article No. 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R. and Kinzig, A.P. (2004) Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 9, Article No. 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 韩自强, 刘杰. 联合国倡导下的韧性城市建设: 内容、机制与启示[J]. 中国行政管理, 2022(7): 139-145.
[9] 曾鹏. 韧性城市与城市韧性发展机制[J]. 人民论坛∙学术前沿, 2022(Z1): 35-45.
[10] 朱正威, 刘莹莹. 韧性治理: 风险与应急管理的新路径[J]. 行政论坛, 2020, 27(5): 81-87.
[11] 程建新, 刘派诚, 杨雨萱. 科层组织如何实现应急状态下的组织韧性?——基层公共组织应对重大突发公共卫生事件的案例分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2023, 39(4): 80-88.
[12] 董幼鸿, 周彦如. 技术赋能城市韧性治理的系统思考[J]. 东南学术, 2022(6): 85-97.
[13] 武永超. 智慧城市建设能够提升城市韧性吗?——一项准自然实验[J]. 公共行政评论, 2021, 14(4): 25-44+196.
[14] 梁珺濡, 刘淑欣, 张惠. 从被动韧性到转型韧性: 智慧社区的灾害韧性提升研究[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(2): 47-54.
[15] 谭跃进, 邓宏钟. 复杂适应系统理论及其应用研究[J]. 系统工程, 2001(5): 1-6.
[16] 陈水生. 城市治理数字化转型: 动因、内涵与路径[J]. 理论与改革, 2022(1): 33-46+156.