ODC-BY协议署名条款的实践研究
A Practical Study on the Signatory Terms of the Open Data Commons Attribution License
DOI: 10.12677/ds.2026.126191, PDF,   
作者: 吴姝涵:西南民族大学法学院,四川 成都
关键词: 开放数据许可协议数据库著作权署名权Open Data Licensing Agreement Databases Copyright Right of Attribution
摘要: ODC-BY协议是专为数据库设计的国际化开放数据许可协议,其内容着重于描述署名条款。本文旨在通过规范分析、比较研究等方法,系统剖析ODC-BY署名条款的法律属性、规则体系、实践价值与现实争议,并探索其本土化适配路径。经研究发现,ODC-BY署名条款兼具著作权权利主张、合同义务刚性约束与差异化人身权利适配的三重法律属性;其规则体系围绕数据库传输、数据产出使用构建了全流程规范,并包含特殊情形适配与违约救济机制。该条款在数据溯源、声誉激励、提升数据可信度等方面具有重要实践价值,但同时存在操作标准化不足、跨法域执行差异、重复违约规制薄弱等问题。结合我国法律体系与实践特点,本文提出应从衔接本土法律与政策制度、构建平台技术支撑体系、增进各方认知与执行力度三方面推进本土化进程,为完善我国开放数据许可机制、促进数据合规共享提供理论支撑与实践指引。
Abstract: The Open Data Commons Attribution License is an international open data licensing agreement specifically designed for databases, with its content focusing on the description of attribution terms. This paper systematically analyzes the legal attributes, regulatory framework, practical value, and existing controversies of the ODC-BY attribution terms through normative analysis and comparative studies, while exploring pathways for their localization adaptation. Research reveals that the ODC-BY attribution terms possess three distinct legal attributes: copyright claim rights, rigid contractual obligations, and differentiated personal rights protections. Its regulatory system establishes comprehensive guidelines for database transmission and data utilization, including provisions for special scenarios and breach remedies. While these terms demonstrate significant practical value in data traceability, reputation incentives, and enhancing data credibility, they face challenges such as insufficient operational standardization, cross-jurisdictional enforcement disparities, and inadequate duplicate breach regulations. In light of China’s legal framework and practical characteristics, this paper proposes three key approaches to facilitate localization: aligning with domestic laws and policies, establishing a platform-based technical support system, and enhancing awareness and enforcement among stakeholders. These recommendations provide theoretical foundations and practical guidance for improving China’s open data licensing mechanisms and promoting compliant data sharing.
文章引用:吴姝涵. ODC-BY协议署名条款的实践研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(6): 114-123. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.126191

参考文献

[1] 黄如花, 李楠. 开放数据的许可协议类型研究[J]. 图书馆, 2016(8): 16-21.
[2] WIPO. Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (as Amended on September 28, 1979).
https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/zh/treaties/textdetails/12214
[3] EU (1996) Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the Legal Protection of Databases. Official Journal of the European Communities, 77, 20-28
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/1996/9/oj/eng
[4] 罗娇. 开放数据的著作权解决方案——ODC协议研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2017, 61(9): 23-32.
[5] Etalab. Licence Ouverte2.0.
https://www.data.gouv.fr/pages/legal/licences/etalab-2.0
[6] 王舒, 王红, 宋晓丹. 科研数据的知识产权保护与许可机制研究[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2016, 36(4): 65-71.
[7] 菲彻尔. 版权法与因特网[M]. 郭寿康, 万勇, 译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 2009: 899-902.
[8] 刘阳阳. 公共数据授权运营: 生成逻辑、实践图景与规范路径[J]. 电子政务, 2022(10): 33-46.
[9] 汪晓惠. 科学数据共享许可协议适用的现存问题与完善建议——以20个国家科学数据中心为例[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2026(3): 43-53.
[10] 宋烁. 政府数据开放许可使用进路[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(9): 201-210.
[11] 唐长乐, 武亚楠. 国外档案数据开放研究——基于政府数据开放平台的调查[J]. 档案管理, 2022(5): 109-112.
[12] 常江. 公共数据开放立法原则反思和开放路径构建[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 37(5): 135-148.