逆向混改与企业绿色创新绩效研究综述
A Review of Research on Reverse Mixed-Ownership Reform and Enterprise Green Innovation Performance
DOI: 10.12677/fia.2026.153077, PDF,   
作者: 武悦晴:江西理工大学经济管理学院,江西 赣州
关键词: 逆向混改民营企业绿色创新绩效Reverse Mixed Modification Private Enterprises Green Innovation Performance
摘要: 本文基于现有文献,系统梳理了逆向混改的动因、正负效应,绿色创新绩效的定义和指标评价体系,以及逆向混改和绿色创新绩效的关系、作用机制和国有资本持股比例的影响。研究表明:国资逆向混改的动因是为了助推经济高质量发展,企业逆向混改的动因是优化治理结构、缓解融资约束并获取资源;逆向混改既有改善企业融资、治理与ESG表现等正向作用,也存在行政干预、成本增加及经营僵化等负面效应。绿色创新绩效是企业绿色创新活动产生的综合成效,其评价包含传统投入产出与多维度综合两类指标体系,目前学界尚未形成统一标准。逆向混改整体能够提升民营企业绿色创新绩效,但也存在部分实施效果不达预期的特例。逆向混改主要通过政府补贴、治理优化等路径提升企业绿色创新绩效,且国有资本持股比例越高,对企业绿色创新绩效的促进效果越显著。当前逆向混改与绿色创新绩效相关研究尚处初步探索阶段,未来需对比不同国资入股对民企绿色创新策略的影响差异,剖析逆向混改后企业内部非正式制度的变动及其对企业绿色创新活动的中介与调节机制,并结合政策与技术演进开展动态研究,指导民企绿色可持续发展实践。
Abstract: Based on existing literature, this paper systematically reviews the motivations, positive and negative effects of reverse mixed ownership reform, the definition and indicator evaluation system of green innovation performance, as well as the correlation and mechanism between reverse mixed ownership reform and green innovation performance, and the impact of state-owned capital shareholding ratio. The research finds that the motivation for state-owned capital to promote reverse mixed ownership reform lies in boosting high-quality economic development, while enterprises carry out reverse mixed ownership reform to optimize governance structure, ease financing constraints and acquire heterogeneous resources. Reverse mixed ownership reform exerts positive effects such as improving corporate financing conditions, governance efficiency and ESG performance, while also bringing negative implications including administrative intervention, rising operating costs and operational rigidity. Green innovation performance refers to the comprehensive outcomes generated by enterprises’ green innovation activities, whose evaluation system falls into two categories: traditional input-output indicators and multi-dimensional comprehensive indicators, and there is yet no unified evaluation standard in academic circles. Overall, reverse mixed ownership reform can enhance the green innovation performance of private enterprises, though a few cases fail to achieve expected implementation effects. It mainly improves corporate green innovation performance through pathways such as government subsidies and governance optimization; furthermore, a higher shareholding ratio of state-owned capital yields a more prominent promotional effect on green innovation performance. Current research on reverse mixed ownership reform and green innovation performance is still in the initial exploratory stage. In the future, it is necessary to compare the differential impacts of different state-owned capital investments on private enterprises’ green innovation strategies, analyze changes in enterprises’ internal informal institutions as well as their mediating and regulating mechanisms for green innovation activities, and conduct dynamic research alongside policy and technological evolution to guide the sustainable green development of private enterprises.
文章引用:武悦晴. 逆向混改与企业绿色创新绩效研究综述[J]. 国际会计前沿, 2026, 15(3): 744-750. https://doi.org/10.12677/fia.2026.153077

参考文献

[1] 孙丽文, 任相伟, 李翼凡. 战略柔性、绿色创新与企业绩效——动态环境规制下的一个交互和调节效应模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(22): 82-91.
[2] 李旭. 绿色创新相关研究的梳理与展望[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2015, 27(2): 1-11.
[3] 解学梅, 陈文妍, 倪书阳, 等. 异质性环境规制、绿色创新与企业绿色形象的关系研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2026, 29(4): 1-16.
[4] 廖红伟, 李昕. “逆向混改”与民营企业绿色转型[J]. 学习与探索, 2024(8): 143-153.
[5] 贺佳, 王分棉, 孙宛霖, 等. “反向混改”何以影响民营企业实质性绿色创新?——基于制度理论的视角[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2025, 47(2): 69-83.
[6] 王彩萍, 姜彦君, 任金洋, 等. 国资参股与民营企业高质量发展: 基于绿色创新视角的研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2023(8): 3-15+62.
[7] 富丽明, 田庆. 改革开放以来国企混改的实践与认识研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 26(5): 29-46.
[8] 闫明杰, 马逸欣, 罗曼. 逆向混改促进民营企业参与共同富裕实现的内在逻辑、践行路径与保障策略[J]. 财会通讯, 2024(14): 16-22.
[9] 张静, 陈金奕, 柴天宇. 环保行业民企“逆向混改”对技术创新的影响——以中建环能为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(12): 122-127.
[10] 李善民, 曹铭洋, 杨若明, 等. 经济政策不确定性与市场主体应对——基于民营企业引入国有资本的经验证据[J]. 会计研究, 2023(11): 105-118.
[11] 徐辉, 何悦, 骆淑恬. “逆向混改”动因、路径与效果研究——以小康股份引入东风汽车为例[J]. 财会通讯, 2023(18): 97-104.
[12] 李世刚, 钟柠锘. 国有资本参股能降低民营企业股价崩盘风险吗? [J]. 金融与经济, 2022(10): 26-36.
[13] 姚圣, 徐艺欣. 民营企业“逆向混改”与融资约束缓解: 影响路径与作用效果研究[J/OL]. 中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 27(3): 124-139.
[14] 潘宗玲. “逆向混改”能提升民企风险承担水平吗? [J]. 财会通讯, 2024(1): 66-70.
[15] 邵剑兵, 姜道平. 混合所有制改革与民营经济高质量发展——基于企业ESG表现视角研究[J]. 经济问题, 2024(3): 16-22.
[16] 黄阳, 陈培培, 游夏蕾, 等. 民营企业“反向混改”的治理效应发挥几何?——基于监管问询的证据[J]. 管理工程学报, 2024, 38(1): 162-178.
[17] 肖正, 翟胜宝, 张静. 引入国有资本能够化解民营企业僵尸化风险吗?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 经济管理, 2022, 44(2): 36-56.
[18] 李田恬, 叶建木, 程卓俊. 政府补助与企业僵尸化关系: 探讨市场化进程的调节效应[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版), 2021, 43(1): 71-76+98.
[19] Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A.L. and De Marchi, V. (2018) Absorptive Capacity and Relationship Learning Mechanisms as Complementary Drivers of Green Innovation Performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 432-452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Rauf, F., Baolei, Q., Wanqiu, W., Na, C. and Naveed, K. (2023) R&D Investment, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Firm’s Green Innovation Performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 18, 82-109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Shi, H. and Zhou, Q. (2024) Government R&D Subsidies, Environmental Regulation and Corporate Green Innovation Performance. Finance Research Letters, 69, Article ID: 106088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R. and Chiva, R. (2006) A Measurement Scale for Product Innovation Performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9, 333-346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Arundel, A. and Kemp, R. (2009) Measuring Eco-Innovation. UNU-MERIT Working Paper No. 2009-017, United Nations University, 3-40.
[24] Tseng, M., Wang, R., Chiu, A.S.F., Geng, Y. and Lin, Y.H. (2013) Improving Performance of Green Innovation Practices under Uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 71-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 程华, 廖中举. 中国区域环境创新绩效评价与研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2011, 31(3): 522-528.
[26] 隋俊, 毕克新, 杨朝均, 等. 制造业绿色创新系统创新绩效影响因素——基于跨国公司技术转移视角的研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(3): 440-448.
[27] Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Millán, A. and Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2016) The Antecedents of Green Innovation Performance: A Model of Learning and Capabilities. Journal of Business Research, 69, 4912-4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] García-Granero, E.M., Piedra-Muñoz, L. and Galdeano-Gómez, E. (2018) Eco-innovation Measurement: A Review of Firm Performance Indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 304-317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] Rizos, V., Behrens, A. and Taranic, I. (2018) Measuring Progress in Eco-Innovation. Ceps Papers.
[30] Cheng, C.C.J. (2020) Sustainability Orientation, Green Supplier Involvement, and Green Innovation Performance: Evidence from Diversifying Green Entrants. Journal of Business Ethics, 161, 393-414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 肖仁桥, 丁娟, 钱丽. 绿色创新绩效评价研究述评[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2017(2): 100-110.
[32] 杨浩昌, 李廉水, 张发明. 高技术产业集聚与绿色技术创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(9): 99-112.
[33] 王刚, 李文龙, 威力思. 新质生产力、绿色创新与企业可持续发展绩效[J]. 科学决策, 2025(4): 124-141.
[34] 曾敏. 国有资本参股对民营企业研发创新的影响及其作用机制研究[J]. 经济学家, 2023(12): 66-76.
[35] 李涛, 李昂. 企业创新与环境绩效——基于外部治理环境的视角[J]. 工业技术经济, 2019, 38(10): 92-100.
[36] 余汉, 宋慈笈, 宋增基. 国有股权能够推动民营企业的技术创新吗?——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2021, 23(6): 20-34.
[37] 吴崇, 顾丹, 张佳奇. “逆向混改”如何影响战略性新兴产业民企绿色创新?——基于代表性产业比较分析的视角[J]. 技术经济, 2024, 43(3): 51-63.
[38] 汤义成. 国有资本参股影响民营企业绿色创新的偏向性——促进实质性创新还是策略性创新? [J]. 西部论坛, 2023, 33(6): 96-113.
[39] 李春霞, 王志伟. 国有资本参股对民营企业绿色创新的影响: 助力还是掣肘? [J]. 金融发展研究, 2023(11): 11-21.
[40] 别奥, 杨上广, 罗孝玲. 国有股东参股能否促进民营企业绿色技术创新?——基于民营企业混合所有制改革的经验证据[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 29(5): 109-122.
[41] 何德旭, 曾敏, 张硕楠. 国有资本参股如何影响民营企业?——基于债务融资视角的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(11): 189-207.
[42] 吴佳佩. 民营环保企业逆向混改动因及效果分析——以博世科为例[J]. 老字号品牌营销, 2025(2): 139-141.
[43] 赵鑫, 杨棉之, 曹迅. 国有股权参与、吸收能力与民营企业绿色技术创新——一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(7): 23-33.
[44] 毛志宏, 魏延鹏. 国有资本参股对民营企业绿色创新能力的影响研究[J]. 软科学, 2023, 37(2): 44-50.