护士心理弹性现状及影响因素的Meta分析
Meta-Analysis of the Current Status and Influencing Factors of Nurse Psychological Resilience
DOI: 10.12677/ns.2026.156193, PDF,   
作者: 周 洁*, 刘广郅*, 曹婉璐:青岛大学护理学院,山东 青岛;刘 晔#, 徐晓冰:山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛),山东 青岛
关键词: 护士心理弹性影响因素Meta分析Nurse Psychological Resilience Related Factors Meta-Analysis
摘要: 目的:通过Meta分析明确护士心理弹性现状及其相关影响因素。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库(WANFANG)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、Embase、Web of Science、PubMed、The Cochrane Library、Ebsco等数据库关于护士心理弹性现状及影响因素的相关文章。检索时限为建库至2025年5月。采用Stata 18.0进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入18篇文献,包括7739名护士,提取到6个相关影响因素,Meta分析结果显示心理弹性得分为66.53 (95% CI: 64.58~68.48),处于中等偏下水平。各研究间存在高异质性(I2 = 97.7%),亚组分析提示科室类型可能为异质性来源之一。漏斗图视觉检查呈现不对称,提示潜在的发表偏倚,虽Egger’s检验未提示显著统计学偏倚(P > 0.05),但鉴于纳入研究数量有限,不能完全排除偏倚对合并结果的潜在影响。相关性分析显示,职业倦怠、工作压力和共情疲劳与心理弹性呈显著负相关;积极应对方式、职业认同及社会支持与心理弹性呈显著正相关。结论:当前护士群体的心理弹性处于中等偏下水平,护理管理者应根据相应的相关影响因素制定针对性干预措施,提升护士的心理弹性。
Abstract: Objective: To clarify the current status and influencing factors of nurse psychological resilience through Meta-analysis. Methods: Computer searches were conducted on literature related to the current status and influencing factors of nurse psychological resilience in databases, such as CNKI, WANFANG, CBM, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Ebsco. The search period was from the establishment of each database until May 2025. A Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0. Results: A total of 18 articles, 7739 nurses were included, and 6 influencing factors were extracted. The Meta-analysis results showed that the psychological resilience score was 66.53 (95% CI: 64.58~68.48), which was at the lower moderate level. There was high heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 97.7%), and subgroup analysis suggested that the type of department may be one of the sources of heterogeneity. The visual examination of the funnel plot showed asymmetry, suggesting potential publication bias. Although the Egger’s test did not indicate significant statistical bias (P > 0.05), the potential impact of bias on the combined results could not be completely excluded due to the limited number of included studies. Correlation analysis showed that job burnout, job stress and empathy fatigue were significantly negatively correlated with resilience. Positive coping style, professional identity and social support were significantly positively correlated with psychological resilience. Conclusion: At present, the psychological resilience of nurses was at a general level. Nursing managers should formulate intervention measures according to the corresponding influencing factors to improve the psychological resilience of nurses.
文章引用:周洁, 刘广郅, 刘晔, 徐晓冰, 曹婉璐. 护士心理弹性现状及影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学, 2026, 15(6): 182-192. https://doi.org/10.12677/ns.2026.156193

参考文献

[1] Atkins, P.W.B. and Parker, S.K. (2012) Understanding Individual Compassion in Organizations: The Role of Appraisals and Psychological Flexibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 524-546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Patrician, P.A., Bakerjian, D., Billings, R., Chenot, T., Hooper, V., Johnson, C.S., et al. (2022) Nurse Well-Being: A Concept Analysis. Nursing Outlook, 70, 639-650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 张明凤, 李素莲, 何欣欣, 等. 基于CiteSpace的护士心理弹性的可视化分析[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2023, 20(1): 74-80.
[4] 陈曦, 韩斌如, 徐凤霞, 等. 我国护士心理韧性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020, 20(12): 1845-1849.
[5] Connor, K.M. and Davidson, J.R.T. (2003) Development of a New Resilience Scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76-82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., et al. (2009) The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Healthcare Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. BMJ, 339, b2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] 曾宪涛, 刘慧, 陈曦, 等. Meta分析系列之四: 观察性研究的质量评价工具[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2012, 4(4): 297-299.
[8] 于肖楠, 张建新. 自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较[J]. 心理科学, 2007(5): 1169-1171.
[9] Pu, J., Wang, W., Li, G., Xie, Z., Fan, X., Zhan, N., et al. (2024) Psychological Resilience and Intention to Stay among Nurses: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1407206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Fradelos, E.C., Papathanasiou, I.V., Dafogianni, C., Misouridou, E., Koutelekos, I., Dousis, E., et al. (2023) The Effect of Psychological Resilience and Coping Strategies on Mental Health of Nurses. In: Vlamos, P., Ed., GeNeDis 2022, Springer, 23-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Sukut, O., Sahin‐Bayindir, G., Ayhan‐Balik, C.H. and Albal, E. (2022) Professional Quality of Life and Psychological Resilience among Psychiatric Nurses. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58, 330-338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Rayani, A.M. (2024) The Correlation between Psychological Resilience and Professional Quality of Life in Saudi Psychiatric Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. Psycho-Oncologie, 18, 271-280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 马冰, 黄求进, 王晓春. 黑龙江省男护士心理弹性在社会支持和简单应对方式间的中介作用[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2021, 37(32): 2500-2505.
[14] 王辉, 邢娅娜, 原曼. 心理弹性在临床护士情绪劳动策略与应对方式间的中介效应研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2021, 27(3): 388-393.
[15] 周露, 李婷, 周成莉, 等. 心理弹性在急诊护士应激(压力)反应与应对方式之间的中介效应[J]. 全科护理, 2023, 21(35): 5002-5005.
[16] 刘晓晨, 马月珍, 尹双双, 等. 三级甲等医院再就业护士心理弹性在工作压力和主观幸福感间的中介效应[J]. 全科护理, 2024, 22(15): 2949-2951.
[17] 杨培云, 郑华艳, 栾莹莹, 等. 职业认同与护士工作生活质量的关联: 心理弹性的中介作用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2024, 30(19): 87-91.
[18] 赵雯雯, 宋晶, 赵月元, 等. 心理弹性与一般自我效能影响护士工作满意度的路径分析[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2015, 15(7): 463-465.
[19] 包月. 胜任力、工作倦怠及社会支持对护士心理弹性影响的路径分析[J]. 全科护理, 2017, 15(31): 3844-3847.
[20] 张毓, 陈丹, 郭文琪, 等. 护理人员心理韧性、感知压力、共情疲劳现状及影响因素分析[J]. 心理月刊, 2023, 18(11): 34-37.
[21] 廖晨霞, 杜华, 韩江英, 等. 心理弹性在肿瘤科护士共情疲劳与人文关怀能力间的中介效应[J]. 职业与健康, 2023, 39(21): 2939-2943.
[22] 谢健, 张润, 肖容, 等. 急诊科低年资护士心理弹性的中介效应[J]. 职业与健康, 2022, 38(23): 3215-3219.
[23] 宋美璇, 王玉香, 李显蓉. 心理弹性对外科护理人员工作压力与职业倦怠的中介效应[J]. 职业与健康, 2021, 37(7): 888-892.
[24] 陈臻, 王昱, 许彬, 等. 积极应对方式在重症监护室护士心理弹性与替代性创伤间的中介作用[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(17): 114-119, 126.
[25] 王金华, 张馥丽, 叶红, 等. 规培护士心理弹性与领悟社会支持的相关性研究[J]. 心理月刊, 2023, 18(21): 50-52.
[26] 刘婷, 杨秀兰, 吴笛, 等. 唐山市在职护士职业认同现状及与心理弹性的关系[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2022, 42(11): 2769-2775.
[27] Claponea, R. and Iorga, M. (2023) Exploring the Relationship between Psychosocial Risks, Burnout Levels, and Emotional Intelligence among Medical and Non-Medical Personnel in Romanian Medical Units. Revista Medico-Chirurgicala, 127, 442-457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 屈歌, 冯晶, 夏雯琪, 等. 国内外护士职业倦怠研究综述[J]. 中国社会医学杂志, 2024, 41(6): 728-731.
[29] 王晓晔, 胡珊珊, 李争, 等. 我国急诊科护士职业倦怠发生率及影响因素的系统评价[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020, 26(10): 1324-1330.
[30] Hobfoll, S.E. (1989) Conservation of Resources: A New Attempt at Conceptualizing Stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513-524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 樊春秀. 神经外科护士心理压力原因分析及应对措施[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2017(24): 186-188.
[32] van der Meulen, E., van der Velden, P.G., Setti, I. and van Veldhoven, M.J.P.M. (2018) Predictive Value of Psychological Resilience for Mental Health Disturbances: A Three-Wave Prospective Study among Police Officers. Psychiatry Research, 260, 486-494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] 姜乾金黄, 卢抗生, 娄振山, 扬爱如, 陈慧, 毛宗秀. 心理应激: 应对的分类与心身健康[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1993(4): 145-147, 190.
[34] 闫宁, 杨艳杰, 杨秀贤, 等. 基于护士职业认同的工作压力与离职意愿关系研究[J]. 中国医院管理, 2018, 38(7): 73-75.
[35] Su, Q., Wu, Y., Yun, B., Zhang, H., She, D. and Han, L. (2023) The Mediating Effect of Clinical Teaching Behavior on Transition Shock and Career Identity among New Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nurse Education Today, 125, Article ID: 105780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] 刘霞, 翁金华, 王月琴. 南昌市助产士职业认同现状及与心理弹性和知觉压力的相关分析[J]. 职业与健康, 2024, 40(21): 2960-2963.
[37] 肖水源. 《社会支持评定量表》的理论基础与研究应用[J]. 临床精神医学杂志, 1994(2): 98-100.
[38] Yu, X. and Zhang, J. (2007) Factor Analysis and Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (Cd-Risc) with Chinese People. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35, 19-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[39] Figley, C.R. (2002) Compassion Fatigue: Psychotherapists’ Chronic Lack of Self Care. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1433-1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] 黎黎, 彭丽丽, 汪丰, 等. 积极心理干预对90后护士心理弹性及总体幸福感的影响[J]. 护理学杂志, 2021, 36(14): 82-85.