畸人与“正常身体”——庄子对身体规范的哲学反思
Deformed Persons and the “Normative Body”—Zhuangzi’s Philosophical Reflection on Bodily Norms
摘要: 本文以《庄子》畸人书写为对象,考察其中“正常身体”观念的生成及其哲学批判。在先秦身体观与礼法秩序的语境中,结合《德充符》《人间世》中王骀、申徒嘉、叔山无趾、哀骀它与支离疏等形象,分析身体完整、容止合礼与社会可用性如何构成身体评价尺度。《德充符》通过残形、丑貌与德性充实的并置,拆解“以形定德”的世俗推论;《人间世》则以支离疏为例,显示所谓正常身体是一种可被征役、分工与社会秩序调用的身体形态。由此可见,庄子并非单纯为异常身体辩护,而是借畸人揭示身体规范的建构性,批判以身体预判、分配和安置人的社会机制。
Abstract: This article examines the Zhuangzi’s depictions of deformed persons in order to investigate the formation of the notion of the “normative body” and the philosophical critique directed at it. Within the context of pre-Qin conceptions of the body and ritual-legal order, it analyzes such figures as Wang Tai, Shentu Jia, Shushan Wuzhi, Ai Taituo, and Zhili Shu in the “De Chong Fu” and “Renjian Shi”, showing how bodily wholeness, ritually proper deportment, and social utility came to constitute the standards by which bodies were evaluated. The “De Chong Fu” dismantles the worldly inference that “virtue is determined by bodily form” through its juxtaposition of mutilated bodies, ugly appearances, and fullness of virtue; the “Renjian Shi”, by contrast, takes Zhili Shu as an example to show that the so-called “normative body” also involves a bodily form available for mobilization by corvée labor, social division of labor, and the broader social order. It thus becomes clear that the Zhuangzi does not merely defend anomalous bodies; rather, through its deformed figures, it reveals the constructed nature of bodily norms and criticizes the social mechanisms that prejudge, allocate, and position persons on the basis of their bodies.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Galvany, A. and Graziani, R. (2020) Legal Mutilation and Moral Exclusion: Disputations on Integrity and Deformity in Early China. T’oung Pao, 106, 8-55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[2]
|
张利明. 敬重与逍遥: 儒道互补的身体观[J]. 社会科学战线, 2020(4): 39-45.
|
|
[3]
|
胡平生, 张萌. 礼记[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2017: 272-599.
|
|
[4]
|
陆玖. 吕氏春秋[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2011: 410.
|
|
[5]
|
[清]王先谦. 荀子集解[M]. 沈啸寰, 王星贤, 整理. 北京: 中华书局, 2012: 72.
|
|
[6]
|
郭庆藩, 王孝鱼. 庄子集释(清) [M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1961: 180-210.
|
|
[7]
|
徐莹. 从《德充符》看庄子德概念的道物二重性[J]. 哲学研究, 2024(6): 70-78.
|
|
[8]
|
杨国荣. 世间之“在”——《庄子·人间世》的主题及其内蕴[J]. 华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021, 53(1): 21-29.
|
|
[9]
|
陈赟. 多元生命、复调脉络、隐显线索: 《庄子·德充符》新解[J]. 杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 44(5): 1-23.
|