模拟双水源混合水体附着藻群落结构演替特征
Structural Succession Characteristics of Attached Algae Communities under Dual Water Source Mixing Conditions
DOI: 10.12677/ojfr.2026.132024, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 于子雯, 张祚彬, 冀 睿, 王茁龙, 乔之怡*:天津农学院水产学院,天津市水产生态及养殖重点实验室,天津;张新月:天津天滨同盛环境科技有限公司,天津
关键词: 附着藻类南水北调工程室内模拟混水混水比例环境因子Attached Algae South-to-North Water Diversion Project Indoor Simulated Water Mixing Water Mixing Ratio Environmental Factors
摘要: 为探究调水背景下北方水库附着藻的建群规律及其与水环境因子的关系,以南水北调中线天津段重要调蓄水库——尔王庄水库为对象,开展室内模拟混水试验。室内混水试验依据引江水和引滦水设置5个混水比例,2个水深梯度(距表层10 cm和60 cm)开展研究。结果表明:室内模拟混水中附着藻隶属于4门29科42属66种,其中绿藻门种数占比最高,为45.45%;蓝藻门为27.27%,硅藻门为25.76%;金藻门仅1种。蓝藻门优势种数量最多(7种),湖生假鱼腥藻、长孢藻、游丝藻等在整个试验周期内均持续作为优势种出现。混水比例对不同藻门的影响存在明显差异。统计分析表明,硅藻门生物量受混水比例影响极显著(P < 0.001),其中A2组显著高于A1、A3和A5,说明A2的水源比例更有利于硅藻积累。混水比例对附着藻多样性的影响主要体现在物种丰富度层面,且表层水层对比例变化更敏感。不同混水比例对附着藻群落的影响主要体现在物种丰富度和综合多样性水平,而对群落均匀度的影响相对较弱。在10 cm水层,不同混水比例对Shannon-Wiener指数和Margalef指数均具有显著影响(P < 0.01),在60 cm水层,Margalef丰富度指数仍表现出显著差异(P < 0.01)。冗余分析(RDA)表明,本研究所测定的环境因子仅能解释小部分附着藻群落结构的变异,群落大部分变异尚未得到解释。其中,pH是解释群落结构变异最重要的因子,单因子贡献率为77.1%,差异检验达到显著水平(P < 0.01)。本研究阐明了不同混水比例、水深梯度、时间动态下附着藻的群落结构,为混合水体水库的附着藻生长管理及水质生态调控提供科学依据和理论支持。
Abstract: To investigate the community colonization patterns of attached algae in northern reservoirs under water diversion conditions and their relationships with aquatic environmental factors, an indoor simulated water-mixing experiment was conducted using Erwangzhuang Reservoir, an important regulation reservoir in the Tianjin section of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. The experiment included five mixing ratios of water from the Yangtze River and Luan River, and two water depth gradients (10 cm and 60 cm below the surface). The results showed that attached algae in the simulated mixtures belonged to 66 species, 42 genera, 29 families, and 4 phyla. Chlorophyta accounted for the highest proportion (45.45%), followed by Cyanophyta (27.27%) and Bacillariophyta (25.76%), while only one species was found in Chrysophyta. Cyanophyta had the most dominant species (7), and Pseudanabaena mucicola, Dolichospermum sp., and Planctonema sp. remained dominant throughout the test period. The effects of water-mixing ratios on different phyla varied significantly. Biomass of Bacillariophyta was extremely significantly affected by mixing ratios (P < 0.001), with Group A2 significantly higher than A1, A3, and A5, indicating that A2 was more favorable for diatom accumulation. Mixing ratios mainly affected species richness, and the surface layer was more sensitive to ratio changes, with weak effects on community evenness. At 10 cm, both Shannon-Wiener and Margalef indices differed significantly (P < 0.01); at 60 cm, only Margalef richness index differed significantly (P < 0.01). Redundancy analysis further indicated that pH was the most critical explanatory factor, with a single-factor contribution rate of 77.1% (P < 0.01). This study clarifies the community structure of attached algae under different mixing ratios, water depths and temporal dynamics, providing scientific basis and theoretical support for attached algae management and water quality ecological regulation in multi-water source reservoirs.
文章引用:于子雯, 张新月, 张祚彬, 冀睿, 王茁龙, 乔之怡. 模拟双水源混合水体附着藻群落结构演替特征[J]. 水产研究, 2026, 13(2): 210-223. https://doi.org/10.12677/ojfr.2026.132024

参考文献

[1] 郭雁辉, 刘飞, 甄品娜, 等. 邯郸东部平原多水源氢氧同位素时空变化特征[J]. 地球与环境, 2025, 53(1): 112-122.
[2] 刘健. 山东省多水源调蓄水库水质风险控制技术研究[M]. 济南: 山东省水利科学研究院, 2020.
[3] 彭玉和刘辉. 南水北调中线总干渠着生藻时空分布特征及其对水质指示作用评价[C]中国水利学会. 中国水利学会2019学术年会论文集第四分册. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2019: 394-399.
[4] Sánchez, M.L., Rodríguez, P., Torremorell, A.M., Izaguirre, I. and Pizarro, H. (2016) Phytoplankton and Periphyton Primary Production in Clear and Turbid Shallow Lakes: Influence of the Light Environment on the Interactions between These Communities. Wetlands, 37, 67-77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 夏曼莉, 于谨磊, 何虎, 等. 太湖蓝藻碎屑对水质及附着藻和水丝蚓生物量的影响[J]. 湖泊科学, 2020, 32(4): 1050-1059.
[6] 师艳丽, 闫祯, 张依章, 等. 黄河中游典型丘陵沟壑区着生藻类群落特征及其驱动因素[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(22): 11078-11091.
[7] 冯学凯. 云南红河流域着生藻群落特征及其对环境因子的响应[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 昆明: 云南大学, 2024.
[8] 陈筱诺. 南水北调中线干渠(河南段)着生藻群落结构变化及驱动因子研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南阳: 南阳师范学院, 2022.
[9] 潘宁霞. 基于多水源条件下区域生态调水机制研究[M]. 宁波: 宁波市海曙区农业农村局, 2019.
[10] 翟鑫, 贾海涛, 黄茜. 天津跨流域跨省区调水实践与启示[J]. 人民黄河, 2024, 46(S2): 66-68.
[11] 乔之怡, 等. 水体附着藻建群实验装置[P]. 中国专利, CN202122358877.6. 2022-08-12.
[12] 莫露清, 杨扬, 邰义萍, 等. 城市河流近自然修复过程中附着藻类群落恢复与环境驱动机制[J]. 湖泊科学, 2025, 37(6): 1926-1937.
[13] 汪莉娜, 李林, 周佳华, 等. 信江丰水期着生藻类群落结构空间分布特征及影响因子分析[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2025, 47(12): 98-105.
[14] Sun, L., Wu, L., Liu, X., Huang, W., Zhu, D., Wang, Z., et al. (2023) Reducing the Risk of Benthic Algae Outbreaks by Regulating the Flow Velocity in a Simulated South-North Water Diversion Open Channel. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20, Article 3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] 陈姗, 柳昭莹, 张玮, 等. 上海某河口型景观湖冬季附着藻类的建群过程初探[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(3): 345-351.
[16] Koch, A., Lau, D.C.P., Gönczi, M., Weslien, K. and Corcoll, N. (2026) Periphyton as an Integrative Indicator of Pesticide Bioaccumulation, Nutrient Pollution and Fatty Acid Alterations in Agricultural Streams. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 102, fiag016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Bothwell, M.L. (1989) Phosphorus-Limited Growth Dynamics of Lotic Periphytic Diatom Communities: Areal Biomass and Cellular Growth Rate Responses. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46, 1293-1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Hu, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, J. and Hu, S. (2022) Environmental Drivers and Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment of Periphytic Algae at Inflow Rivers in Six Lakes over the Yangtze River Basin. Water, 14, Article 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 陈亚强, 陈慧黠, 黄胜男, 等. 朱隈子水库及上游河流浮游植物功能群特征与环境因子的关系[J]. 大连海洋大学学报, 2025, 40(5): 854-863.
[20] Nimick, D.A., Gammons, C.H., Cleasby, T.E., Madison, J.P., Skaar, D. and Brick, C.M. (2003) Diel Cycles in Dissolved Metal Concentrations in Streams: Occurrence and Possible Causes. Water Resources Research, 39, Article 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Mangan, N.M., Flamholz, A., Hood, R.D., Milo, R. and Savage, D.F. (2016) Ph Determines the Energetic Efficiency of the Cyanobacterial CO2 Concentrating Mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, E5354-E5362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]