右心声学造影与RoPE量表在PFO相关隐源性卒中患者中的相关性及初步诊断
Correlation and Preliminary Diagnosis of Right Heart Echocardiography and RoPE Scale in Patients with PFO-Related Cryptogenic Stroke
DOI: 10.12677/acm.2026.1662383, PDF,   
作者: 李书涛:延安大学延安医学院,陕西 延安;张义和:延安大学附属医院心脑血管医院心血管外科CCU,陕西 延安
关键词: 隐源性卒中卵圆孔未闭经胸右心声学造影RoPE量表Cryptogenic Stroke Patent Foramen Ovale Transesophageal Right Heart Echocardiography RoPE Scale
摘要: 目的:初步探索经胸右心声学造影(cTTE)分流等级与反常栓塞风险(RoPE)量表在卵圆孔未闭(PFO)相关性隐源性卒中(CS)患者中的相关性,评估二者联合诊断的临床价值。方法:回顾性纳入2023年1月至2025年1月延安大学附属医院心脑血管医院收治的86例CS患者,根据辅助检查结果分为PFO-CS组(41例)与非PFO-CS组(45例)。收集两组患者临床资料,采用cTTE评估右向左分流(RLS)等级,计算RoPE评分,分析两组指标差异、cTTE与RoPE评分的相关性。结果:① PFO-CS组RoPE评分[(6.12 ± 0.98)分]、皮层梗死率(70.7%)显著高于非PFO-CS组[(3.36 ± 1.19)分、31.1%] (t = 11.588,χ2 = = 13.471,P均<0.001);② Valsalva动作下的RLS检出率(56.98%)明显高于静息状态下的检出率(37.21%),且结果差异有统计学意义(χ2 = 6.744, P < 0.05);③ Pearson相关性分析得出:cTTE分流等级与RoPE评分在PFO相关CS患者中呈显著正相关(r = 0.698, P < 0.001);④ 年龄、皮层梗死、无高血压病史、无吸烟史等指标是PFO相关CS发生的重要影响因素。结论:cTTE分流等级与RoPE评分在PFO相关CS患者中呈显著正相关;Valsalva动作可显著提升RLS检出率。
Abstract: Objective: To preliminarily explore the correlation between the shunt grade of transesophageal echocardiography (cTTE) and the Risk of Paradoxical Embolism (RoPE) scale in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) associated with patent foramen ovale (PFO), and to evaluate the clinical value of their combined diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective study enrolled 86 CS patients admitted to the Cardiovascular Hospital of Yan’an University Affiliated Hospital from January 2023 to January 2025. Patients were categorized into PFO-CS (n = 41) and non-PFO-CS (n = 45) groups based on ancillary examination results. Clinical data were collected for both groups. Right-to-left shunt (RLS) severity was assessed using cTTE, and RoPE scores were calculated. Differences in clinical indicators between groups and correlations between cTTE and RoPE scores were analyzed. Results: ① The RoPE score [(6.12 ± 0.98) points] and cortical infarction rate (70.7%) in the PFO-CS group were significantly higher than those in the non-PFO-CS group [(3.36 ± 1.19) points and 31.1%, respectively] (t = 11.588, χ2 = 13.471, P < 0.001 for both); ② The detection rate of RLS during the Valsalva maneuver (56.98%) was significantly higher than that at rest (37.21%), with statistically significant differences (χ2 = 6.744, P < 0.05); ③Pearson correlation analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between cTTE shunt grade and RoPE score in PFO-associated CS patients (r = 0.698, P < 0.001); ④ Age, cortical infarction, absence of hypertension history, and absence of smoking history were identified as significant risk factors for PFO-associated CS. Conclusion: cTTE shunt grade and RoPE score showed a significant positive correlation in PFO-associated CS patients; the Valsalva maneuver significantly improved RLS detection rate.
文章引用:李书涛, 张义和. 右心声学造影与RoPE量表在PFO相关隐源性卒中患者中的相关性及初步诊断[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(6): 1681-1688. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1662383

参考文献

[1] Maloku, A., Hamadanchi, A., Franz, M., Dannberg, G., Günther, A., Klingner, C., et al. (2021) Patent Foramen Ovale—When to Close and How? Herz, 46, 445-451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Baik, M., Shim, C.Y., Gwak, S., Kim, Y.D., Nam, H.S., Lee, H.S., et al. (2022) Patent Foramen Ovale and Risk of Recurrence in Stroke of Determined Etiology. Annals of Neurology, 92, 596-606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Huber, C., Wachter, R., Pelz, J. and Michalski, D. (2022) Current Challenges and Future Directions in Handling Stroke Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale—A Brief Review. Frontiers in Neurology, 13, Article 855656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Rinkel, L.A., Bouma, B.J., Boekholdt, S.M., Beemsterboer, C.F.P., Lobé, N.H.J., Beenen, L.F.M., et al. (2023) Detection of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with Ischemic Stroke on Prospective ECG-Gated Cardiac CT Compared to Transthoracic Echocardiography. Journal of Neurology, 270, 3537-3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Kent, D.M., Saver, J.L., Kasner, S.E., Nelson, J., Carroll, J.D., Chatellier, G., et al. (2021) Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects in an Analysis of Pooled Individual Patient Data from Randomized Trials of Device Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale after Stroke. JAMA, 326, 2277-2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] 王浩, 吴伟春, 施怡声, 等. 卵圆孔未闭右心声学造影中国专家共识[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2022, 37(5): 449-458.
[7] Sharrief, A.Z., Chaturvedi, S., Cole, J.W., et al. (2025) 2024 Guideline for the Primary Prevention of Stroke: A Guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 56, e98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Elzanaty, A.M., Patel, N., Sabbagh, E. and Eltahawy, E.A. (2021) Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in the Management of Cryptogenic Stroke: A Review of Current Literature and Guideline Statements. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 37, 377-384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] 于超, 谢玉环, 陈桂武, 等. 不明原因脑卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作患者右心声学造影结果分析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2020, 36(10): 904-907.
[10] Kanemaru, K., Ueno, Y., Kikuno, M., Tateishi, Y., Shimizu, T., Kuriki, A., et al. (2023) High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale and Elderly in Cryptogenic Stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 32, Article ID: 107344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Putaala, J., Martinez-Majander, N., Leppert, M., Tulkki, L., Pirinen, J., Tolppanen, H., et al. (2025) Burden of Modifiable Risk Factors in Young-Onset Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke by High-Risk Patent Foramen Ovale. Stroke, 56, 1428-1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Farjat-Pasos, J.I., Nuche, J., Mesnier, J., Panagides, V., Cloutier, S., Houde, C., et al. (2022) Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in Stroke Patients with Thrombophilia: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Journal of Stroke, 24, 335-344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Lucà, F., Pino, P.G., Parrini, I., Di Fusco, S.A., Ceravolo, R., Madeo, A., et al. (2023) Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: Integrated Management. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12, Article 1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Thaler, D.E., Ruthazer, R., Weimar, C., Mas, J., Serena, J., Di Angelantonio, E., et al. (2014) Recurrent Stroke Predictors Differ in Medically Treated Patients with Pathogenic vs Other PFOs. Neurology, 83, 221-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Chaturvedi, A., Moroni, F., Axline, M., Tomdio, A., Mojadidi, M.K. and Gertz, Z. (2023) Comparative Evaluation of Intracardiac, Transesophageal, and Transthoracic Echocardiography in the Assessment of Patent Foramen Ovale: A Retrospective Single‐Center Study. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 102, 1348-1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Takaya, Y., Watanabe, N., Ikeda, M., Akagi, T., Nakayama, R., Nakagawa, K., et al. (2020) Importance of Abdominal Compression Valsalva Maneuver and Microbubble Grading in Contrast Transthoracic Echocardiography for Detecting Patent Foramen Ovale. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 33, 201-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Elsheikh, S., Lip, G.Y.H. and Abdul-Rahim, A.H. (2023) Potential Embolic Sources in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale: Look Harder. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 52, 607-608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Kwok, C.S., Alisiddiq, Z., Will, M., Schwarz, K., Khoo, C., Large, A., et al. (2024) The Modified Risk of Paradoxical Embolism Score Is Associated with Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A Nationwide US Analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 11, Article 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Wang, Y., Zhao, T., Ma, Y. and Hu, W. (2023) Modified Risk of Paradoxical Embolism More Effectively Evaluates the Risk of Stroke Associated with Patent Foramen Ovale. Current Neurovascular Research, 20, 423-428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Turc, G., Lee, J., Brochet, E., Kim, J.S., Song, J. and Mas, J. (2020) Atrial Septal Aneurysm, Shunt Size, and Recurrent Stroke Risk in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 75, 2312-2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Akagi, T. (2021) Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Journal of Cardiology, 77, 3-9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Kheiwa, A., Hari, P., Madabhushi, P. and Varadarajan, P. (2020) Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Defect. Echocardiography, 37, 2172-2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Rigatelli, G., Zuin, M. and Bilato, C. (2023) Atrial Septal Aneurysm Contribution to the Risk of Cryptogenic Stroke in Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale: A Brief Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, 33, 329-333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Mas, J., Saver, J.L., Kasner, S.E., Nelson, J., Carroll, J.D., Chatellier, G., et al. (2022) Association of Atrial Septal Aneurysm and Shunt Size with Stroke Recurrence and Benefit from Patent Foramen Ovale Closure. JAMA Neurology, 79, 1175-1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]