秦岭山区生态清洁小流域建设成熟度评价——以商南县试马河小流域为例
Maturity Evaluation of Ecological Clean Small Watershed Construction in the Qinling Mountain Area—A Case Study of the Shima River Small Watershed in Shangnan County
DOI: 10.12677/gser.2026.153046, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张 雁*, 房 舒:秦岭南麓生态水文陕西省野外科学观测研究站,陕西 商洛;商洛学院城乡规划与建筑工程学院,陕西 商洛;魏媛媛#:商洛市自然资源局高新区分局,陕西 商洛;陈永朋:商洛市商州区水利工作站,陕西 商洛
关键词: 生态清洁小流域成熟度AHP-模糊综合评价茶旅产业秦岭山区Ecological Clean Small Watershed Maturity AHP-Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation The Tea and Tourism Industry Qinling Mountain
摘要: 为了了解生态清洁小流域建设发展的阶段特征,基于成熟度模型的阶段化诊断思想,构建生态基底稳固度、产业融合深度、利益联结紧密度、治理与政策适配度4个维度14项二级指标的成熟度指标体系,采用AHP-模糊综合评价法结合专家群组判断,对秦岭山区以茶旅融合为典型特征的试马河生态清洁小流域建设现状进行评估。结果表明:试马河小流域建设成熟度综合得分为87.9分,评价等级为良好;权重及隶属度联合诊断显示,在生态底线已稳固的前提下,当前短板集中体现为产业链延伸不足、全季候产品不完善及利益联结机制稳定性偏弱三个方面。研究结果可为秦岭山区同类茶旅型生态清洁小流域从达标示范向深度融合跃迁提供诊断依据。
Abstract: To identify the phased characteristics of ecological clean small watershed development, a maturity index system with 14 secondary indicators across four dimensions (ecological base stability, industrial integration depth, interest connection tightness, and governance-policy adaptability) was constructed based on the phased diagnosis concept of the maturity model. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method combined with expert group judgment was employed to assess the current construction status of the Shima River ecological clean small watershed, a typical tea-tourism integration project in the Qinling Mountains. The results showed that the comprehensive maturity score of Shima River small watershed construction was 87.9 points, with an evaluation grade of “good”. The joint diagnosis based on weight and membership degree revealed that, on the premise that the ecological bottom line had been stabilized, current shortcomings were concentrated in three aspects: insufficient extension of the industrial chain, imperfect all-season products, and weak stability of the interest connection mechanism. The findings provide a diagnostic reference for similar tea-tourism integrated ecological clean small watersheds in the Qinling Mountains to transition from compliance demonstration to in-depth integration.
文章引用:张雁, 魏媛媛, 陈永朋, 房舒. 秦岭山区生态清洁小流域建设成熟度评价——以商南县试马河小流域为例[J]. 地理科学研究, 2026, 15(3): 488-495. https://doi.org/10.12677/gser.2026.153046

参考文献

[1] 胡春宏, 张晓明. 山水林田湖草沙系统治理与水土保持高质量发展[J]. 水土保持通报, 44(4): 441-447.
[2] 姜德文. 生态产品价值实现背景下生态清洁小流域建设[J]. 亚热带水土保持, 2025, 37(4): 1-4.
[3] 乔殿新. 生态清洁小流域高质量发展探讨[J]. 中国水利, 2023(23): 38-41.
[4] 崔艳平, 李林, 王海生, 等. 陕西省南水北调中线工程水源地生态清洁小流域治理模式与经验[J]. 中国水土保持, 2025(10): 88-91.
[5] 刘晔, 张守红, 李华林, 等. 中国生态清洁小流域综合治理研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(5): 2042-2057.
[6] 沈雪建. 一体化推进水土保持工程建设中推动水土保持生态产品价值实现的若干思考[J]. 中国水土保持, 2025(9): 1-4+34+95.
[7] 赵永军. 加快推进水土保持生态产品价值实现的对策与建议[J]. 中国水土保持, 2025(9): 5-9+19.
[8] 张文聪. 水土保持生态产品价值实现探索与思考[J]. 水利发展研究, 2025, 25(8): 53-57.
[9] 李钢, 刘克军, 裘涛, 等. 基于安吉县典型案例的水土保持生态产品价值实现过程分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2025, 53(12): 46-47+136.
[10] 张利超, 李学荣, 赵建民, 等. 江西省首单生态清洁小流域水土保持生态产品价值转化交易实践与成效[J]. 中国水土保持, 2025(8): 54-57+62.
[11] 王海峰. 基于层次分析法的清洁型小流域评价指标体系研究[J]. 地下水, 2019, 44(4): 182-184.
[12] 莫明浩, 谢颂华, 张磊, 等. 南方红壤侵蚀区生态清洁小流域评价研究: 以江西省为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(6), 1016-1022.
[13] 陈家东, 刘少栋, 卢旭东, 等. 海南儋州文柏生态清洁小流域评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2025, 23(6): 186-196.
[14] Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B. and Weber, C.V. (1993) Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10, 18-27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] 陈秋霞, 李诗涵, 许章华, 等. 基于能力成熟度模型的农村人居环境治理能力研究[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2023, 39(9): 1089-1097.
[16] 金贤, 朱亮. 基于能力成熟度模型的湖泊水生态系统服务功能评价研究[J]. 环境科技, 2018, 31(6): 43-48.