数字时代下劳动者离线权实现路径研究
Research on the Realization Path of Workers’ Offline Rights in the Digital Age
DOI: 10.12677/ass.2026.156477, PDF,   
作者: 都拉娜:上海大学法学院,上海
关键词: 离线权劳动基准休息权Offline Rights Labor Benchmark Right to Rest
摘要: 数字时代工作与生活边界模糊,隐形加班常态化,离线权应运而生。离线权是休息权在数字场景的延伸与补强,核心是劳动者在非工作时间有权断开工作通讯、拒绝额外任务且不受不利后果。这一权利的正当性植根于人格尊严与自主权,以及工作生活平衡的原则之中。然而,当前我国在引入离线权面临劳动基准规制与企业经营效能存在冲突、权利主体界定困难、线上加班时间难以计算等挑战。为实现离线权,应采取立法确立与劳资协商结合的路径,明确以“支配性劳动管理”为标准分层界定权利主体,覆盖典型劳动者与新业态从业者。同时,借鉴国外经验确立用人单位全面工时记录义务,破解加班举证难题。
Abstract: In the digital age, the boundaries between work and life have become blurred, and covert overtime has become a norm. Offline rights have emerged. Offline rights extend and reinforce the right to rest in the digital context. The core of this right is that workers have the right to disconnect from work communication, refuse additional tasks, and not be subject to adverse consequences during non-working hours. The legitimacy of this right is rooted in human dignity, autonomy, and the principle of work-life balance. However, in China, when introducing offline rights, there are challenges such as conflicts between labor benchmark regulations and enterprise operational efficiency, difficulties in defining the rights holders, and difficulties in calculating online overtime hours. To realize offline rights, a legislative approach combining legislation and labor negotiations should be adopted. The rights holders should be clearly defined based on the standard of “dominant labor management”, covering typical workers and new business practitioners. At the same time, foreign experience should be drawn upon to establish the obligation of employers to record comprehensive working hours, solving the problem of proving overtime.
文章引用:都拉娜. 数字时代下劳动者离线权实现路径研究[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2026, 15(6): 289-297. https://doi.org/10.12677/ass.2026.156477

参考文献

[1] 陈雪薇, 张鹏霞. “不在线是一种奢望”: 断连的理论阐释与研究进展[J]. 新闻与传播评论, 2021, 74(4): 39-48.
[2] 王健. 必要的消失: 论劳动者的离线权[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 31(6): 77-91.
[3] 谢增毅. 离线权的法律属性与规则建构[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(11): 35-49.
[4] 傅溢. 离线权的再定位与适用进路[J]. 浙江社会科学, 2025(12): 72-83, 157.
[5] 谢增毅. 劳动法视野下工作生活平衡原则的确立与规则建构[J]. 法学研究, 2025, 47(4): 38-57.
[6] 王玉玲. 我国离线权保障的困境根源与建构策略[J]. 中国劳动关系学院学报, 2025, 39(3): 70-81.
[7] 郑尚元, 傅成. 数智时代劳动者离线权的保护逻辑与现实考量[J]. 社会科学研究, 2025(6): 134-142.
[8] 那杨, 吴梦玉. 互联网平台用工模式下的劳动关系认定[J]. 河北法学, 2025, 43(11): 122-140.
[9] 吴万江. 新就业形态中外卖骑手与平台企业劳动关系的司法认定——以指导性案例238号为例[J]. 法律适用, 2025(6): 82-95.
[10] 魏汝虎. 数字时代劳动者离线权实现研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2024.
[11] 孙丽娜. 数字时代我国劳动者离线权的规则构建[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2025.
[12] 朱晓峰. 数字时代离线权民法保护的解释路径[J]. 环球法律评论, 2023, 45(3): 24-42.
[13] 战东升. 论数字时代劳动者的离线权[J]. 法律科学(西北政法大学学报), 2026, 44(2): 54-46.
[14] 唐辰明. “已读不回” 能否成为权利: 我国构建离线权的冷思考[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2025(11): 51-58.
[15] 葛家欣. 数字时代劳动者离线权保障: 欧盟经验与中国路径[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 35(5): 95-105.
[16] 王天玉. 劳动关系认定标准的法理[J]. 中国应用法学, 2025(2): 40-50.
[17] 田野. 数智时代的过劳问题及其法律因应[J]. 中国法学, 2025(3): 65-85.
[18] 王倩. 论离线权的必要、限度与实现[J]. 环球法律评论, 2025, 47(6): 134-150.