基于深度光流的结构简谐位移响应监测方法
Structural Harmonic Displacement Response Monitoring Method Based on Deep Optical Flow
DOI: 10.12677/hjce.2026.156154, PDF,   
作者: 郭 晋, 许维炳*:北京工业大学建筑工程学院,北京;黎家玮:北京市公路事业发展中心,北京;孙玉龙, 周大兴:中铁建设集团有限公司,北京;周春娟:北京工业大学建筑工程学院,北京;陕西省建筑科学研究院有限公司,陕西 西安;姬勇刚, 曹 康:云南省交通投资建设集团有限公司,云南 昆明
关键词: 结构简谐位移响应计算机视觉深度学习光流网络Structural Harmonic Displacement Response Computer Vision Deep Learning-Based Optical Flow Network
摘要: 传统接触式位移测量方法存在对场地要求高、现场施工周期长、经济性差等问题。鉴于此,本文通过图像预处理、相机标定、畸变校正,并结合稠密光流估计网络,提出一种基于深度学习的结构简谐位移监测方法。结果表明,所提出方法对规则正弦振动条件下的结构简谐位移响应时程具有较好的识别效果,视觉位移时程与激光位移计结果具有较高一致性。视觉位移时程相对于激光位移计基准结果的RMSE为0.208~0.246 mm,峰值误差为0.692~0.780 mm,相对误差为13.84%~15.60%。
Abstract: Traditional contact-based displacement measurement methods suffer from stringent site requirements, long on-site installation periods, and poor cost-effectiveness. To address these limitations, this study proposes a deep learning-based monitoring method for structural harmonic displacement response through image preprocessing, camera calibration, distortion correction, and dense optical flow estimation. The results show that the proposed method achieves good identification performance for structural harmonic displacement responses under regular sinusoidal excitation, and the vision-based displacement measurements are in good agreement with those obtained from the laser displacement meter. The RMSE between the vision-based displacement time histories and the laser-based reference results ranges from 0.208 to 0.246 mm, the peak error ranges from 0.692 to 0.780 mm, and the relative error ranges from 13.84% to 15.60%.
文章引用:郭晋, 许维炳, 黎家玮, 孙玉龙, 周大兴, 周春娟, 姬勇刚, 曹康. 基于深度光流的结构简谐位移响应监测方法[J]. 土木工程, 2026, 15(6): 50-56. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjce.2026.156154

参考文献

[1] 郑佳艳, 毛若愚, 吴桐, 等. 基于欧拉放大和灰度均值差法的桥梁动态响应研究[J]. 公路工程, 2021, 46(3): 45-53+187.
[2] 蒋华, 龚德书. 基于近景摄影测量的建筑物结构动态位移监测系统[J]. 南通大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 9(4): 19-23.
[3] 舒小华, 王珺, 闫松. 基于计算机视觉的结构位移测量技术及应用进展综述[J]. 火箭推进, 2024, 50(6): 40-51.
[4] Yoon, H., Elanwar, H., Choi, H., Golparvar-Fard, M. and Spencer, B.F. (2016) Target-Free Approach for Vision-Based Structural System Identification Using Consumer-Grade Cameras: Target-Free Vision-Based Structural System Identification. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 23, 1405-1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Feng, D., Feng, M., Ozer, E. and Fukuda, Y. (2015) A Vision-Based Sensor for Noncontact Structural Displacement Measurement. Sensors, 15, 16557-16575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Won, J., Park, J.W., Park, K., Yoon, H. and Moon, D. (2019) Non-Target Structural Displacement Measurement Using Reference Frame-Based Deepflow. Sensors, 19, Article 2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Dong, C.Z., Celik, O., Catbas, F.N., O’Brien, E.J. and Taylor, S. (2020) Structural Displacement Monitoring Using Deep Learning-Based Full Field Optical Flow Methods. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 16, 51-71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Xu, H., Zhang, J., Cai, J., Rezatofighi, H. and Tao, D. (2022) GMFlow: Learning Optical Flow via Global Matching. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, 18-24 June 2022, 8111-8120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2017) Attention Is All You Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998-6008.