决策者视角下注意力企业行为模型的机理与演进
The Mechanism and Evolution of the Attention-Based Corporate Behavior Model from the Decision-Maker Perspective
摘要: 注意力基础观将企业决策研究从静态结构引向动态认知过程,对揭示企业行为的微观机制具有重要意义。文章以决策者为核心视角,系统梳理注意力企业行为模型的六个组成部分(决策环境、问题与答案、注意力结构、程序与沟通渠道、决策者、组织行为)及其十二个互动机制,深入分析决策者在模型各环节中的能动作用。研究发现:决策者既是环境刺激的接收者,也是注意力结构的塑造者,更是问题定义与答案选择的执行者,其认知特征与层级位置深刻影响注意力配置效率。研究为理解企业战略决策的微观认知基础提供了理论支撑。
Abstract: The attention-based view shifts corporate decision-making research from static structures to dynamic cognitive processes. This perspective is essential for uncovering the micro-mechanisms that drive firm behavior. Adopting the decision-maker as the core analytical lens, this paper systematically examines the six components of the attention-based corporate behavior model: decision environment, problems and answers, attentional structure, procedures and communication channels, decision-makers, and organizational behavior. It further explores their twelve interaction mechanisms and analyzes the active role of decision-makers throughout the model. The findings indicate that decision-makers serve not only as receivers of environmental stimuli but also as shapers of attentional structure and executors of problem definition and answer selection. Their cognitive traits and hierarchical positions significantly influence the efficiency of attention allocation. This study offers theoretical insights into the micro-cognitive foundations underlying corporate strategic decision-making.
文章引用:江逸扬. 决策者视角下注意力企业行为模型的机理与演进[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(6): 614-621. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.156675

参考文献

[1] Ocasio, W. (1997) Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Terjesen, S. and Patel, P.C. (2017) In Search of Process Innovations: The Role of Search Depth, Search Breadth, and the Industry Environment. Journal of Management, 43, 1421-1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Dong, J.Q. and Netten, J. (2017) Information Technology and External Search in the Open Innovation Age: New Findings from Germany. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 120, 223-231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Cohen, M.D., March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1972) A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] OCASIO, W. (1997) Towards an Attention-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187-206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Dahl, R.A. and Simon, H. (1957) Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Proceses in Administrative Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 244-258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Vuori, T.O. (2024) Emotions and Attentional Engagement in the Attention-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Organization, 22, 189-210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Garg, V.K., Walters, B.A. and Priem, R.L. (2003) Chief Executive Scanning Emphases, Environmental Dynamism, and Manufacturing Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 725-744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Li, Q., Maggitti, P.G., Smith, K.G., Tesluk, P.E. and Katila, R. (2013) Top Management Attention to Innovation: The Role of Search Selection and Intensity in New Product Introductions. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 893-916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Joseph, J. and Gaba, V. (2015) The Fog of Feedback: Ambiguity and Firm Responses to Multiple Aspiration Levels. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1960-1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Barnett, M.L. (2008) An Attention-Based View of Real Options Reasoning. Academy of Management Review, 33, 606-628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Tuggle, C.S., Sirmon, D.G., Reutzel, C.R. and Bierman, L. (2010) Commanding Board of Director Attention: Investigating How Organizational Performance and CEO Duality Affect Board Members’ Attention to Monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 946-968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Haas, M.R., Criscuolo, P. and George, G. (2015) Which Problems to Solve? Online Knowledge Sharing and Attention Allocation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 680-711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Vissa, B., Greve, H.R. and Chen, W. (2010) Business Group Affiliation and Firm Search Behavior in India: Responsiveness and Focus of Attention. Organization Science, 21, 696-712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Bouquet, C. and Birkinshaw, J. (2008) Weight versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention from Corporate Headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 577-601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Levy, O. (2005) The Influence of Top Management Team Attention Patterns on Global Strategic Posture of Firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 797-819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Tang, Y., Li, J. and Yang, H. (2015) What I See, What I Do: How Executive Hubris Affects Firm Innovation. Journal of Management, 41, 1698-1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Gerstner, W., König, A., Enders, A. and Hambrick, D.C. (2013) CEO Narcissism, Audience Engagement, and Organizational Adoption of Technological Discontinuities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58, 257-291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Kammerlander, N. and Ganter, M. (2015) An Attention‐Based View of Family Firm Adaptation to Discontinuous Technological Change: Exploring the Role of Family CEOs’ Noneconomic Goals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 361-383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Crilly, D. and Sloan, P. (2012) Enterprise Logic: Explaining Corporate Attention to Stakeholders from the ‘Inside‐Out’. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1174-1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Souitaris, V. and Maestro, B.M.M. (2010) Polychronicity in Top Management Teams: The Impact on Strategic Decision Processes and Performance of New Technology Ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 652-678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Liu, G., Ko, W.W. and Chapleo, C. (2017) Managing Employee Attention and Internal Branding. Journal of Business Research, 79, 1-11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Grégoire, D.A., Barr, P.S. and Shepherd, D.A. (2010) Cognitive Processes of Opportunity Recognition: The Role of Structural Alignment. Organization Science, 21, 413-431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Hunt, J.G., Osborn, R.N. and Boal, K.B. (2009) The Architecture of Managerial Leadership: Stimulation and Channeling of Organizational Emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 503-516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Haq, H.U., Drogendijk, R. and Blankenburg Holm, D. (2017) Attention in Words, Not in Deeds: Effects of Attention Dissonance on Headquarters-Subsidiary Communication in Multinational Corporations. Journal of World Business, 52, 111-123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Joseph, J. and Wilson, A.J. (2018) The Growth of the Firm: An Attention‐Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 39, 1779-1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Lampel, J., Shamsie, J. and Shapira, Z. (2009) Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 20, 835-845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 吴建祖, 王欣然, 曾宪聚. 国外注意力基础观研究现状探析与未来展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2009, 31(6): 58-65.
[29] 李岩. 数字化转型下石油企业信息化管理体系构建与优化研究[J]. 中国管理信息化, 2025, 28(13): 139-142.
[30] 窦晓莹. 数字化企业的工作流管理研究解析[J]. 商场现代化, 2024(4): 98-100.
[31] 丁杰. 数字经济时代纺织企业管理策略探究[J]. 商场现代化, 2023(18): 92-94.
[32] 吴武清, 赵越, 苏子豪. 企业信息化建设与审计费用——数字化转型时期的新证据[J]. 审计研究, 2022(1): 106-117.
[33] 王子坤. 基于数字化转型的企业信息化管理平台建设探索[J]. 老字号品牌营销, 2024(14): 159-161.