情绪认知驱动的社会情感优化算法研究
Research on Social Emotional Optimization Algorithm Driven by Emotional Cognition
摘要: 针对社会情感优化算法仅依靠社会评价值优化策略而导致的动态适应性差、搜索策略过渡生硬等问题,提出一种基于情绪认知驱动的社会情感优化算法(EC-SEOA)。算法引入满足、欢喜、愉悦、平静、焦虑、烦躁、疲劳七级类脑连续情绪机制,通过情绪激励值实现情绪状态自适应判定,并给出标准化阈值与推荐参数取值;构建情感吸引力–排斥力协同交互模型,增强种群多样性;设计包含工作记忆、趋势预判与维度注意力的高级认知决策模块,形成情绪–认知闭环调控机制。在Sphere、Rosenbrock、Rastrigin、Griewank标准测试函数上与多种智能算法对比,结果表明:所提算法收敛更快、寻优精度更高、稳定性更强,在多峰与高维复杂优化问题中优势显著,为复杂工程优化提供一种新型类脑智能优化方法。
Abstract: Aiming at the problems of poor dynamic adaptability and rigid transition of search strategies existing in the social emotional optimization algorithm (SEOA), which only relies on the social evaluation value for optimization, an emotional cognition-driven social emotional optimization algorithm (EC-SEOA) is proposed. The algorithm introduces a seven-level brain-like continuous emotional mechanism, including satisfaction, joy, delight, calmness, anxiety, irritated, and fatigue. It realizes the adaptive judgment of emotional states through emotional incentive values, and provides standardized thresholds and recommended parameter values. A collaborative interaction model of emotional attraction-repulsion is constructed to enhance population diversity. An advanced cognitive decision-making module including working memory, trend prediction, and dimensional attention is designed to form a closed-loop regulation mechanism of emotion-cognition. Comparative experiments with various intelligent algorithms are carried out on the Sphere, Rosenbrock, Rastrigin, and Griewank standard test functions. The results show that the proposed EC-SEOA has faster convergence speed, higher optimization accuracy, and stronger stability, and exhibits significant advantages in multimodal and high-dimensional complex optimization problems. This study provides a new type of brain-like intelligent optimization method for complex engineering optimization.
文章引用:郑建拥, 王茜, 张晨, 范翔. 情绪认知驱动的社会情感优化算法研究[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2026, 16(6): 202-210. https://doi.org/10.12677/csa.2026.166220

参考文献

[1] Wang, X.T., Han, Y.M., Chu, C. and Geng, Z. (2026) Adaptive Small-Family Population-Guided Swarm Intelligence Optimization Algorithm. Science China Information Sciences, 69, Article 132208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 黄耀宣, 程杉, 黄永章, 等. 基于改进粒子群算法的MMC-STATCOM参数仿射辨识方法[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2025, 53(9): 176-187.
[3] 李根, 柴洪洲, 靳凯迪, 等. 水下地形匹配定位抗差粒子滤波算法[J]. 测绘学报, 2025, 54(10): 1841-1851.
[4] 王志磊, 罗永健, 方志豪, 牛凌云. 基于改进粒子群优化算法的多无人机协同搜索与目标发现研究[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2026, 16(2): 141-154.
[5] Guilbault, R. (2025) S-EPSO: A Socio-Emotional Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Multimodal Search in Low-Dimensional Engineering Applications. Espace ÉTS.
https://espace2.etsmtl.ca/id/eprint/31207/1/Guilbault-R-2025-31207.pdf
[6] 卫东选. 基于改进遗传算法的机场停机位分配问题研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2006.
[7] 谢乔. 基于情感偏好衰减的推荐算法研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 西南财经大学, 2017.
[8] 刘峰. 基于皮肤电信号的情感识别与调节研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2015.
[9] Lieto, A., Bhatt, M., Oltramari, A. and Vernon, D. (2017) The Role of Cognitive Architectures in General Artificial Intelligence. Cognitive Systems Research, 48, 1-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Franklin, S. (2007) A Foundational Architecture for Artificial General Intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 157, 36-54.
[11] Qureshi, R., Sapkota, R., Shah, A., et al. (2025) Thinking Beyond Tokens: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Cognitive Foundations for Artificial General Intelligence and its Societal Impact. arXiv:2507.00951.
[12] Lieto, A., Radicioni, D., Rho, V. and Mensa, E. (2017) Towards a Unifying Framework for Conceptual Represention and Reasoning in Cognitive Systems. Intelligenza Artificiale: The International Journal of the AIxIA, 11, 139-153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 崔志华. 社会情感优化算法[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2011.
[14] 于家根, 刘正江, 卜仁祥, 等. 于社会情感优化算法的船舶转向避碰决策[J]. 中国航海, 2018, 41(3):81-86.
[15] 马财生, 任廷志, 杨二旭. 基于社会情感优化算法的步进式同心圆无钟高炉布料控制研究[J]. 燕山大学学报, 2017, 41(1): 21-26.
[16] 王瑛岐, 崔志华, 谭瑛. 基于情感强度定律的社会情感优化算法[J]. 太原科技大学学报, 2012, 33(4): 249-253.
[17] 武建娜, 崔志华, 刘静. 基于二次插值法的社会情感优化算法[J]. 计算机应用, 2011, 31(9): 2522-2525, 2533.