患者主导型护理模式在哮喘自我管理中的应用及效果评价
Application and Effect Evaluation of Patient-Centered Care Model in Asthma Self-Management
摘要: 目的:探讨患者主导型护理模式在支气管哮喘患者自我管理中的应用效果。方法:采用随机对照试验设计,纳入2024年1~12月70例哮喘患者,随机分为观察组(n = 35)与对照组(n = 35)。观察组实施患者主导型护理模式,包括个性化教育、智能监测、协作决策及同伴支持,干预6个月;对照组接受常规护理(健康教育手册、电话随访及门诊复诊)。比较两组基线、干预3个月及6个月的肺功能(FEV1%预计值)、哮喘控制测试(ACT)评分、Morisky用药依从性量表(MMAS-8)及哮喘自我效能量表(ASES)评分。结果:干预后,观察组FEV1%预计值从76.42 ± 9.64提升至88.71 ± 7.12 (P < 0.001),ACT评分从17.23 ± 3.54升至22.46 ± 2.15 (P < 0.001),MMAS-8评分提高41.3% (7.35 ± 0.85 vs. 5.20 ± 1.30, P < 0.001),ASES评分达73.64 ± 8.75 (P < 0.001),均显著优于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组均未发生严重不良反应。结论:患者主导型护理模式通过数字化动态管理及协作决策机制,可有效改善哮喘患者肺功能、症状控制及自我管理能力,且安全性良好。
Abstract: Objective: To explore the application effect of the patient-centered care model in the self-management of patients with bronchial asthma. Methods: A randomized controlled trial design was adopted. 70 asthma patients from January to December 2024 were included and randomly divided into the observation group (n = 35) and the control group (n = 35). The observation group implemented the patient-centered care model, including personalized education, intelligent monitoring, collaborative decision-making, and peer support, with an intervention period of 6 months; the control group received routine care (health education manual, telephone follow-up, and outpatient follow-up). The baseline, 3-month intervention, and 6-month intervention of lung function (FEV1% predicted value), asthma control test (ACT) score, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), and asthma self-efficacy scale (ASES) score were compared between the two groups. Results: After the intervention, the FEV1% predicted value of the observation group increased from 76.42 ± 9.64 to 88.71 ± 7.12 (P < 0.001), the ACT score increased from 17.23 ± 3.54 to 22.46 ± 2.15 (P < 0.001), the MMAS-8 score increased by 41.3% (7.35 ± 0.85 vs. 5.20 ± 1.30, P < 0.001), and the ASES score reached 73.64 ± 8.75 (P < 0.001), all of which were significantly better than those of the control group (P < 0.05). No serious adverse reactions occurred in both groups. Conclusion: The patient-centered care model, through digital dynamic management and collaborative decision-making mechanisms, can effectively improve the lung function, symptom control, and self-management ability of asthma patients, and has good safety.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
侯桂花. 基于冰山理论的护理对支气管哮喘患者自我管理能力及健康行为的影响[J]. 中华养生保健, 2024, 42(19): 144-147.
|
|
[2]
|
周丽娜, 王果, 张亚琼, 等. 心理护理联合排痰护理改善支气管哮喘患者心理状态、提高自我管理能力的影响[J]. 黑龙江医药科学, 2024, 47(5): 194-195+198.
|
|
[3]
|
麻瑞瑞, 陈李娟, 程琳. 基于FMEA模式的风险护理干预对支气管哮喘患者呼吸功能及自我管理能力的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2024, 41(8): 1264-1267.
|
|
[4]
|
高亚清, 向丽. 以知信行理论为指导的自我管理护理模式对老年支气管哮喘患者生活质量及其病情控制的影响[J]. 贵州医药, 2023, 47(12): 1980-1981.
|
|
[5]
|
范淑芳, 崔娟妮. 家庭型医养护一体化服务结合同伴教育对支气管哮喘患者病情控制、主观幸福感、自我管理能力的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2023, 8(7): 151-153.
|
|
[6]
|
石娜, 陈凤娇. 基于家庭赋权理论的护理结合Orem自护理论干预对学龄期哮喘患儿自我管理能力及吸入疗法掌握程度的影响[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2023, 8(7): 175-177.
|
|
[7]
|
沈秋叶, 郭林林. 以自我管理能力为核心的过渡期护理模式对支气管哮喘病人自我管理能力及呼吸功能的影响[J]. 全科护理, 2023, 21(5): 661-665.
|
|
[8]
|
陈娟, 田密, 李叶. 群组管理结合PDCA循环模式的健康教育对学龄期哮喘患儿自我管理行为的影响[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2023, 30(2): 95-99.
|
|
[9]
|
Tian, S., Huang, X., Li, J., Chen, C. and Zhang, H. (2026) Digital, Remotely Delivered Management Interventions for Adult Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 14, Article ID: 1776893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[10]
|
王艳辉, 王晶晶, 黄歆, 等. 血管内皮生长因子、血清内皮素-1与支气管哮喘肺功能、气道炎症的关系及临床意义分析[J]. 临床内科杂志, 2024, 41(12): 852-854.
|
|
[11]
|
张君君, 李敏, 张雪. 基于社会认知理论的家庭支持干预对老年高血压病人的效果评价[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2024, 49(5): 680-685.
|
|
[12]
|
王怡竣, 江洪, 余锂镭. 数字健康干预在高血压的研究进展[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2024, 16(7): 876-878.
|
|
[13]
|
王文雅, 林江涛, 刘春涛, 等. 哮喘治疗依从性与肺功能和控制水平的相关性分析[J]. 中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2022, 21(11): 761-767.
|