算法价格歧视下消费者权益的法律保障研究
Research on the Legal Protection of Consumers’ Rights and Interests under Algorithmic Price Discrimination
摘要: 算法价格歧视是经营者利用算法与大数据获取的消费者信息结合而形成的市场定价行为,以压榨消费者剩余来获取最大利益。在这过程中不仅侵害消费者的隐私权、知情权、选择权等权益,且经营者可利用资源优势取得竞争优势,对市场竞争秩序造成威胁。面对算法价格歧视带来的挑战,《反垄断法》与《民法典》难以直接适用,并且消费者面临举证难及举证成本高的困境,需要架构合理归责体系。基于以上现状,本文主张《反垄断法》扩大适用主体。在责任机制上,明确各法律主体之间的责任分配,并对算法价格歧视行为实施方适用过错推定与举证责任倒置原则。同时,引入算法解释权制度来达到规制算法价格歧视行为,达到保护消费者权益的目的。
Abstract: Algorithmic price discrimination is a market pricing practice whereby business operators use algorithms and big data to acquire consumer information and then combine such information to set prices, with the aim of extracting consumer surplus and maximizing profits. This practice not only infringes upon consumers’ rights to privacy, to be informed, and to choose, but also enables operators to leverage their resource advantages to gain a competitive edge, thereby threatening the order of market competition. In the face of the challenges posed by algorithmic price discrimination, the Anti-Monopoly Law and the Civil Code are difficult to apply directly, and consumers are confronted with the dilemma of evidentiary difficulties and high evidentiary costs; it is therefore necessary to construct a reasonable liability attribution system. Based on the foregoing, this article argues for expanding the scope of entities subject to the Anti-Monopoly Law. In terms of liability mechanisms, the allocation of responsibilities among various legal subjects should be clarified, and the principles of presumed fault and reversal of the burden of proof should be applied to those who engage in algorithmic price discrimination. At the same time, a system of the right to an explanation of algorithms should be introduced to regulate algorithmic price discrimination, thereby achieving the goal of protecting consumer rights and interests.
文章引用:刘东豪. 算法价格歧视下消费者权益的法律保障研究[J]. 争议解决, 2026, 12(6): 195-201. https://doi.org/10.12677/ds.2026.126201

参考文献

[1] 陈群峰, 周恩惠. 数字经济时代算法价格歧视的反垄断法规制[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2023(3): 207-219.
[2] 承上. 人工智能时代个性化定价行为的反垄断规制——从大数据杀熟展开[J]. 中国流通经济, 2020, 34(5): 121-128
[3] 廖建凯. “大数据杀熟”法律规制的困境与出路——从消费者的权利保护到经营者算法权力治理[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2020, 22(1): 70-82.
[4] 刘晶. 电商经营者大数据“杀熟”行为的违法性分析及规制路径探讨[J]. 私法, 2020, 33(1): 226-245
[5] 丁国峰, 江竞轩. 算法价格歧视反垄断规制的逻辑与进路[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2024, 17(5): 551-560.
[6] 胡元聪, 冯一帆. 大数据杀熟中消费者公平交易权保护探究[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022, 51(1): 161-176.
[7] 朱建海. “大数据杀熟”反垄断规制的理论证成与路径优化[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2021(5): 112-121.
[8] 韩世鹏. 算法价格歧视的规制困境与治理新解——基于算法解释权的视角[J]. 科技与法律(中英文), 2022(6): 90-98.
[9] 张凌寒. 算法规制的迭代与革新[J]. 法学论坛, 2019, 34(2): 16-26.
[10] 张凌寒. 商业自动化决策算法解释权的功能定位与实现路径[J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 41(2): 51-60+191.