烤烟烟叶含水率、砂土率、碎片率、含梗率对烟叶质量的影响
Effects of Moisture Content, Sand and Soil Content, Fragment Rate, and Stem Content on Tobacco Leaf Quality in Flue-Cured Tobacco
DOI: 10.12677/hjas.2026.166114, PDF,   
作者: 王文超*, 周应奎, 游立清, 盛小贺, 贺丹锋, 熊 雁, 谭明华, 周 超, 代斌杰#:红云红河烟草(集团)有限责任公司曲靖卷烟厂,云南 曲靖;王 涛, 张豹林:云南省烟草公司曲靖市公司,云南 曲靖
关键词: 烤烟含水率砂土率碎片率含梗率烟叶质量曲靖地区Flue-Cured Tobacco Moisture Content Soil and Sand Content Fragment Rate Stem Content Tobacco Leaf Quality Qujing Region
摘要: 为明确曲靖地区烤烟烟叶含水率、砂土率、碎片率、含梗率对烟叶质量及加工特性的影响,优化烟叶收购标准与复烤工艺。方法:以2025年曲靖地区1383条工商交接检测数据为材料,按品种、产地、等级分层,采用描述性统计、单因素方差分析及Duncan多重比较,分析四项指标分布特征及其与烟叶质量的关联规律。结果:1) 含水率:云烟121最高(16.8%),红大最低(16.2%);下部叶(X组)显著高于上部叶(B组,p < 0.05)。2) 砂土率:宣威市(0.27%)、富源县(0.26%)显著偏高,麒麟区最低(0.18%, p < 0.05);呈X组 > C组 > B组(p < 0.05)。3) 碎片率:师宗县最高(0.025%),马龙区最低(0.020%);X3F达0.026%,显著高于多数等级(p < 0.05)。4) 含梗率:云烟121最高(36.1%),陆良县最低(33.4%);呈X组 > C组 > B组(p < 0.05)。结论:在2025年曲靖地区工商交接样本中,四项物理指标与烟叶品种、产地、部位、等级密切相关;低等级及下部叶质量表现较差。研究结果仅适用于曲靖地区,可为当地烟叶收购与复烤工艺优化提供参考。
Abstract: The aim was to clarify the effects of moisture content, sand and soil content, fragment rate, and stem content on the quality and processability of flue-cured tobacco in Qujing, so as to optimize purchasing standards and redrying technology. Methods: A total of 1383 industrial-commercial transfer records in Qujing (2025) were analyzed by variety, origin, and grade. Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, and Duncan’s multiple range test were conducted. Results: 1) Moisture content: Yunyan 121 had the highest value (16.8%), while Hongda had the lowest (16.2%); lower leaves (Group X) were significantly higher than upper leaves (Group B, p<0.05). 2) Sand content: Xuanwei City (0.27%) and Fuyuan County (0.26%) were significantly higher, and Qilin District was the lowest (0.18%, p < 0.05), showing Group X > C > B (p < 0.05). 3) Fragment rate: Shizong County was the highest (0.025%), Malong District was the lowest (0.020%); X3F reached 0.026%, significantly higher than most grades (p < 0.05). 4) Stem content: Yunyan 121 was the highest (36.1%), Luliang County was the lowest (33.4%), showing Group X > C > B (p < 0.05). Conclusion: For the 2025 Qujing dataset, the four physical indicators were closely related to variety, origin, stalk position, and grade; lower-grade and lower-position leaves performed poorly. The results are applicable only to the Qujing region and can provide a reference for local tobacco purchasing and drying optimization.
文章引用:王文超, 周应奎, 游立清, 盛小贺, 贺丹锋, 熊雁, 谭明华, 周超, 王涛, 张豹林, 代斌杰. 烤烟烟叶含水率、砂土率、碎片率、含梗率对烟叶质量的影响[J]. 农业科学, 2026, 16(6): 951-958. https://doi.org/10.12677/hjas.2026.166114

参考文献

[1] 杨虹琦, 周冀衡, 李永平, 等. 云南不同产区主栽烤烟品种烟叶物理特性的分析[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2008, 14(6): 30-36.
[2] 王浩雅, 王理珉, 孙力, 等. 云南不同烤烟品种叶片物理特性的差异分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2012, 41(3): 47-50.
[3] 周南, 潘文杰, 高维常, 等. 烤烟含梗率研究进展[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2016(3): 83-85.
[4] 文书, 腾兆波. 烟草物理检测[M]. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 1997: 188-209.
[5] 朱云燕, 陈雪. 毕节地区烤烟不同叶位烟叶化学成分和物理特性的差异分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007, 35(31): 9953-9954.
[6] 窦玉青, 汤朝起, 沈钢, 等. 中国烤烟烟叶含梗率研究初探[J]. 西南农业学报, 2009, 22(6): 1532-1535.
[7] 汤朝起, 潘红源, 沈钢, 等. 初烤烟叶含水率与含梗率研究初报[J]. 中国烟草学报, 2009, 15(6): 61-65.
[8] 李志强. 烟叶含梗率与出丝率关系的回归分析[J]. 烟草科技, 2019, 52(4): 78-83.
[9] 杨明峰. 不同产地烤烟砂土率差异及其对感官质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(15): 112-118.
[10] 曲靖卷烟厂. 2025年原料五片区工商交接质量检测报告[R]. 2025.