法治化营商环境视阈下应对内卷式竞争法律研究
Legal Research on Combating Involutionary Competition from the Perspective of a Law-Based Business Environment
摘要: 在我国经济转向高质量发展的关键阶段,法治化营商环境建设与市场竞争秩序治理的协同性愈发凸显。文章以2025年新修订的《反不正当竞争法》为制度切入点,系统解构内卷式竞争的生成逻辑、表现样态及其对法治化营商环境核心价值的侵蚀。研究表明,内卷式竞争在平台经济、传统产业与要素市场呈现差异化特征,其本质是规则供给滞后、监管协同不足、市场结构失衡与创新激励缺位共同导致的非效率竞争困境。基于竞争法功能主义、政府–市场平衡与交易成本理论,文章提出“立法完善–执法协同–司法保障–行业自律”四位一体的法律治理框架,通过细化公平竞争审查标准、明确平台责任边界、健全中小企业权利救济机制,为法治化营商环境优化与内卷治理提供理论支撑与实践路径。
Abstract: At the critical juncture of China’s economic transition towards high-quality development, the synergy between the construction of a law-based business environment and the governance of market competition order has become increasingly prominent. Taking the newly revised Anti-Unfair Competition Law of 2025 as the institutional entry point, this paper systematically deconstructs the generative logic and manifestations of involutionary competition, as well as its erosion of the core values of a law-based business environment. The study indicates that involutionary competition presents differentiated characteristics across the platform economy, traditional industries, and factor markets. Its essence constitutes a dilemma of inefficient competition, jointly precipitated by the lag in rule supply, insufficient regulatory coordination, market structure imbalance, and the absence of innovation incentives. Grounded in the functionalism of competition law, the government-market equilibrium, and transaction cost theory, this paper proposes a four-pronged legal governance framework encompassing “legislative improvement, coordinated enforcement, judicial protection, and industry self-discipline”. By refining the standards for fair competition review, delineating the boundaries of platform liability, and perfecting the legal remedies for SMEs, this study provides theoretical support and practical pathways for optimizing the law-based business environment and governing involution-style competition.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
袁莉. 营商环境法治化构建框架与实施路径研究[J]. 学习与探索, 2022(5): 80-86.
|
|
[2]
|
黄勇, 苏润生. 以竞争政策统筹协调“内卷式”竞争的法律规制与综合治理[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2025(1): 49-53.
|
|
[3]
|
欧阳日辉, 刘璇. 数字平台“内卷式”竞争的发生机制、潜在风险与破解对策[J]. 财经问题研究, 2025(3): 3-19.
|
|
[4]
|
焦海涛, 梅珂悦. “内卷式”竞争的反垄断法定位及其规制[J]. 财经问题研究, 2025(8): 31-44.
|
|
[5]
|
刘志彪, 王兵. 中国制造业“内卷式”恶性竞争的发生机制与破解路径[J]. 财经问题研究, 2024(12): 3-15.
|
|
[6]
|
黄宗智. 再论内卷化, 兼论去内卷化[J]. 开放时代, 2021(1): 157-168+8.
|
|
[7]
|
龚雪, 荆林波. 平台经济反垄断: 国际实践与经验启示[J]. 世界社会科学, 2024(1): 137-149+245-246.
|
|
[8]
|
喻玲. 系统论视野下反垄断鼓励创新制度的重构[J]. 法制与社会发展, 2025, 31(1): 150-171.
|
|
[9]
|
张继焦, 吴玥. 中国经济社会变迁——内卷还是发展[J]. 贵州社会科学, 2023(4): 76-86.
|
|
[10]
|
娄成武, 张国勇. 治理视阈下的营商环境: 内在逻辑与构建思路[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2018, 46(2): 59-65.
|
|
[11]
|
刘英奎, 吴文军, 李媛. 中国营商环境建设及其评价研究[J]. 区域经济评论, 2020(1): 70-78.
|
|
[12]
|
Drsey, E., Manne, G.A., Rybnicek, J., et al. (2020) Consumer Welfare & the Rule of Law: The Case against the New Populist Antitrust Movement. Pepperdine Law Review, 47, 861-916.
|