3D生物打印技术在泌尿系统主要器官组织工程中的研究进展
Research Progress of 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering of Major Urinary Organs
摘要: 泌尿系统疾病涉及肾脏、输尿管、膀胱和尿道等多个器官,常伴有结构缺损、屏障破坏、尿液传导障碍、储排尿功能异常及局部瘢痕化等问题。传统治疗手段在维持生命、恢复尿路连续性和改善症状方面仍具有基础地位,但在供体短缺、免疫排斥、供区损伤、组织适配性不足和远期功能恢复有限等方面存在局限。3D生物打印融合医学影像建模、计算机辅助设计、生物材料、细胞打印和组织工程技术,能够按照预设空间结构沉积细胞、生物墨水及生物活性因子,为泌尿系统组织修复、类器官构建、疾病模型和个体化治疗评价提供新的技术路径。本文围绕肾脏、膀胱、尿道和输尿管等主要器官,系统综述3D生物打印在泌尿系统组织工程中的研究进展,重点讨论诱导多能干细胞来源肾脏类器官、可灌注肾小管模型、器官特异性脱细胞外基质生物墨水、膀胱分层支架、尿道狭窄修复和输尿管长段缺损替代等方向。现有研究显示,该领域已由早期支架成型逐步转向细胞微环境调控、器官特异性功能模拟和患者个体化模型建立;但完整功能性泌尿器官打印尚未实现,血管化、神经化、功能成熟、长期安全性和标准化评价仍是制约临床转化的关键瓶颈。短中期内,肾脏方向更适合服务于体外疾病模型和药物筛选,尿道、输尿管及膀胱局部修复则可能成为较早开展临床前转化验证的应用场景。
Abstract: Diseases of the urinary system involve multiple organs, including the kidney, ureter, bladder and urethra, and are frequently associated with tissue defects, barrier dysfunction, impaired urine transport, abnormal storage and voiding function, infection and fibrosis. Conventional therapies, including dialysis, transplantation, reconstructive surgery and autologous tissue substitution, remain clinically indispensable but are limited by donor shortage, immune rejection, donor-site morbidity, anatomical mismatch and insufficient long-term functional recovery. Three-dimensional bioprinting integrates medical image-based modeling, computer-aided design, biomaterials, cell deposition and tissue engineering, allowing spatially controlled fabrication of cells, bioinks and bioactive cues. This review summarizes current progress in 3D bioprinting for major urinary organs, with emphasis on induced pluripotent stem cell-derived kidney organoids, perfusable renal tubule models, organ-specific decellularized extracellular matrix bioinks, layered bladder scaffolds, urethral stricture repair and ureteral reconstruction. Current evidence suggests that urological bioprinting has shifted from scaffold fabrication toward regulation of cellular microenvironments, organ-specific functional modeling and personalized platforms. However, printing of fully functional urinary organs remains a long-term goal, and clinical translation is still limited by vascularization, innervation, functional maturation, long-term safety and standardized evaluation. In the near to medium term, kidney bioprinting may be more suitable for in vitro disease modeling and drug screening, whereas localized bladder repair and personalized tubular grafts for the urethra and ureter may represent more feasible translational directions.
文章引用:周虹兵, 韦高猛. 3D生物打印技术在泌尿系统主要器官组织工程中的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(6): 1960-1970. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1662416

参考文献

[1] 王刚, 李东辉, 白志明. 长段输尿管损伤替代治疗的方法、材料及修复重建的演变历程[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2020, 24(8): 1299-1305.
[2] 赵文硕, 胡梦博, 李超婧, 等. 组织工程输尿管的研究进展及纺织技术应用前瞻[J]. 东华大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 49(6): 19-25.
[3] 陈杰, 廖成成, 赵红波, 等. 组织工程尿道支架及其制备技术在尿道重建中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2021, 25(22): 3591-3596.
[4] 杨国荣, 吕凯凯, 吴洋洋, 等. 下尿路和外生殖器战创伤及其诊疗研究进展[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2024, 49(3): 335-342.
[5] Turunen, S., Kaisto, S., Skovorodkin, I., Mironov, V., Kalpio, T., Vainio, S., et al. (2018) 3D Bioprinting of the Kidney—Hype or Hope? AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering, 2, 119-162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Homan, K.A., Kolesky, D.B., Skylar-Scott, M.A., Herrmann, J., Obuobi, H., Moisan, A., et al. (2016) Bioprinting of 3D Convoluted Renal Proximal Tubules on Perfusable Chips. Scientific Reports, 6, Article No. 34845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Lawlor, K.T., Vanslambrouck, J.M., Higgins, J.W., Chambon, A., Bishard, K., Arndt, D., et al. (2021) Cellular Extrusion Bioprinting Improves Kidney Organoid Reproducibility and Conformation. Nature Materials, 20, 260-271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Xu, K., Han, Y., Huang, Y., Wei, P., Yin, J. and Jiang, J. (2022) The Application of 3D Bioprinting in Urological Diseases. Materials Today Bio, 16, Article ID: 100388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Dai, Y., Yang, L. and Chen, G. (2022) Application of 3D Bioprinting in Urology. Micromachines, 13, Article 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Liu, K., Hu, N., Yu, Z., Zhang, X., Ma, H., Qu, H., et al. (2023) 3D Printing and Bioprinting in Urology. International Journal of Bioprinting, 9, Article 969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 黄文华. 生物3D打印在器官再造中的前沿热点和研究进展[J]. 器官移植, 2022, 13(2): 161-168.
[12] 王曙东, 马倩, 王可, 等. 3D生物打印制备组织工程支架的研究进展[J]. 纺织学报, 2023, 44(3): 210-220.
[13] 陈珊珊, 王肸肸, 甘闽, 等. 3D生物打印技术综述[J]. 橡塑技术与装备, 2023, 49(4): 9-12.
[14] 饶玮祎, 杨长明, 李竞航, 等. 生物3D打印技术及组织工程应用研究进展[J]. 电加工与模具, 2023(1): 1-8.
[15] 宋佳奇, 陈海莲, 阳范文. 生物3D打印在医学领域的研究及应用[J]. 中国医疗设备, 2021, 36(7): 151-154, 165.
[16] 李玲, 丁文, 刘明. 基于干细胞与生物3D打印技术的皮肤组织工程研究与应用进展[J]. 中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2024, 40(2): 198-207.
[17] 安子彦, 肖树伟, 符伟军, 等. 生物来源水凝胶在膀胱组织工程中的研究进展[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2021, 42(2): 220-223.
[18] 王曙东, 丁晨, 王可, 等. 蚕丝蛋白管状支架材料的制备及应用进展[J]. 材料导报, 2023, 37(S1): 483-497.
[19] 古孝雪, 于晶, 杨明英, 等. 丝素蛋白3D打印在生物医学领域中的应用[J]. 化学进展, 2022, 34(6): 1359-1368.
[20] 王真, 黄传真, 徐龙华, 等. 生物陶瓷3D打印技术研究进展与趋势[J]. 燕山大学学报, 2024, 48(3): 189-203.
[21] Quinteira, R., Gimondi, S., Melica, M.E., Caballero, D., Castanheira, A., Espiña, B., et al. (2026) 3D Bioprinting Meets Nanotherapeutics: A Vehicle for Sustained Extracellular Vesicle Delivery. Biomaterials, 328, Article ID: 123851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Shin, J., Tabatabaei Rezaei, N., Choi, S., Li, Z., Kim, D. and Kim, K. (2025) Photocrosslinkable Kidney Decellularized Extracellular Matrix‐Based Bioink for 3D Bioprinting. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 14, Article ID: 2501616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Wu, M., Zhou, H., Hu, J., Wang, Z., Xu, Y., Wu, Y., et al. (2024) Decellularized Porcine Kidney-Incorporated Hydrogels for Cell-Laden Bioprinting of Renal Cell Carcinoma Model. International Journal of Bioprinting, 10, Article 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Perin, F., Ricci, A., Fagiolino, S., Rak-Raszewska, A., Kearney, H., Ramis, J., et al. (2025) Bioprinting of Alginate-Norbornene Bioinks to Create a Versatile Platform for Kidney in Vitro Modeling. Bioactive Materials, 49, 550-563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Shin, J., Chung, H., Kumar, H., Meadows, K., Park, S., Chun, J., et al. (2024) 3D Bioprinting of Human IPSC-Derived Kidney Organoids Using a Low-Cost, High-Throughput Customizable 3D Bioprinting System. Bioprinting, 38, e00337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Fransen, M.F.J., Addario, G., Bouten, C.V.C., Halary, F., Moroni, L. and Mota, C. (2021) Bioprinting of Kidney in Vitro Models: Cells, Biomaterials, and Manufacturing Techniques. Essays in Biochemistry, 65, 587-602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Takasato, M., Er, P.X., Chiu, H.S. and Little, M.H. (2016) Generation of Kidney Organoids from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. Nature Protocols, 11, 1681-1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Taguchi, A. and Nishinakamura, R. (2017) Higher-Order Kidney Organogenesis from Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Stem Cell, 21, 730-746.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Little, M.H. and Combes, A.N. (2019) Kidney Organoids: Accurate Models or Fortunate Accidents. Genes & Development, 33, 1319-1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Humphreys, B.D. (2021) Bioprinting Better Kidney Organoids. Nature Materials, 20, 128-130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] Chaicharoenaudomrung, N., Kunhorm, P. and Noisa, P. (2019) Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Systems as an in Vitro Platform for Cancer and Stem Cell Modeling. World Journal of Stem Cells, 11, 1065-1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Atala, A., Bauer, S.B., Soker, S., Yoo, J.J. and Retik, A.B. (2006) Tissue-Engineered Autologous Bladders for Patients Needing Cystoplasty. The Lancet, 367, 1241-1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Chowdhury, S.R., Keshavan, N. and Basu, B. (2021) Urinary Bladder and Urethral Tissue Engineering, and 3D Bioprinting Approaches for Urological Reconstruction. Journal of Materials Research, 36, 3781-3820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Booth, D., Afshari, R., Ghovvati, M., Shariati, K., Sturm, R. and Annabi, N. (2024) Advances in 3D Bioprinting for Urethral Tissue Reconstruction. Trends in Biotechnology, 42, 544-559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Zhang, K., Fu, Q., Yoo, J., Chen, X., Chandra, P., Mo, X., et al. (2017) 3D Bioprinting of Urethra with PCL/PLCL Blend and Dual Autologous Cells in Fibrin Hydrogel: An in Vitro Evaluation of Biomimetic Mechanical Property and Cell Growth Environment. Acta Biomaterialia, 50, 154-164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]