脑卒中后失语症康复治疗研究进展
Advances in Rehabilitation Treatment for Post-Stroke Aphasia
摘要: 脑卒中后失语症(post-stroke aphasia, PSA)是脑卒中常见并发症之一，严重影响患者语言交流能力及生活质量。目前传统治疗主要包括言语语言治疗、针灸治疗等，但部分患者恢复效果仍不理想。近年来，随着神经调控技术、智能康复技术和神经影像学技术的发展，经颅磁刺激(repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, rTMS)、经颅直流电刺激(transcranial direct current stimulation, tDCS)、脑机接口(brain-computer interface, BCI)、人工智能辅助语言康复等新型治疗技术在脑卒中后失语症的康复治疗中取得疗效并取得新进展。本文对脑卒中后失语症的发病机制及近年来新型治疗技术的研究新进展进行综述，以期为临床治疗提供参考。
Abstract: Post-stroke aphasia (PSA) is a common complication of stroke that severely affects patients’ linguistic communication abilities and quality of life. Current conventional treatments primarily include speech-language therapy and acupuncture; however, recovery outcomes remain suboptimal for some patients. In recent years, with advancements in neuromodulation techniques, intelligent rehabilitation technologies, and neuroimaging, novel therapeutic approaches—such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), brain-computer interface (BCI), and artificial intelligence-assisted language rehabilitation—have achieved therapeutic efficacy and yielded new progress in the rehabilitation of post-stroke aphasia. This review summarizes the pathogenesis of post-stroke aphasia and recent advances in emerging therapeutic techniques, aiming to provide a reference for clinical practice.
文章引用：肖柱, 苏怡, 高奥, 王红. 脑卒中后失语症康复治疗研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2026, 16(6): 2128-2137. https://doi.org/10.12677/acm.2026.1662433

参考文献

[1] Lazar, R.M. and Boehme, A.K. (2017) Aphasia as a Predictor of Stroke Outcome. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 17, Article No. 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Weterings, R.P., Kessels, R.P., de Leeuw, F. and Piai, V. (2023) Cognitive Impairment after a Stroke in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Stroke, 18, 888-897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Knecht, S., Hesse, S. and Oster, P. (2011) Rehabilitation after Stroke. Deutsches Ärzteblatt international, 108, 600-606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Le, H. and Lui, F. (2024) Aphasia. StatPearls Publishing.
[5] Konishi, M., Funayama, M., Saito, F., et al. (2025) Exploring the Impact of Aphasia Severity on Employment, Social Participation, and Quality of Life.
[6] Cséfalvay, Z., Čiernik Kevická, V. and Horňáková, M. (2025) Patient-Reported Impact of Aphasia after Stroke on Activities, Participation, and Emotional Well-Being: Results from the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire (AIQ-21). Rehabilitácia, 62, 182-191.
[7] 刘雪云, 柯俊, 李坦, 等. 卒中后失语症语言康复机制和治疗研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2018, 24(8): 23-27.
[8] Geranmayeh, F., Chau, T.W., Wise, R.J.S., Leech, R. and Hampshire, A. (2017) Domain-General Subregions of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Contribute to Recovery of Language after Stroke. Brain, 140, 1947-1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Hamilton, R.H. (2016) Neuroplasticity in the Language System: Reorganization in Post-Stroke Aphasia and in Neuromodulation Interventions. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 34, 467-471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Nunn, K. and Vallila-Rohter, S. (2023) Theory-Driven Treatment Modifications: A Discussion on Meeting the Linguistic, Cognitive, and Psychosocial Needs of Individual Clients with Aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 103, Article 106327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Mesulam, M.M. (1990) Large-Scale Neurocognitive Networks and Distributed Processing for Attention, Language, and Memory. Annals of Neurology, 28, 597-613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Kiran, S. and Thompson, C.K. (2019) Neuroplasticity in Aphasia: A Proposed Framework of Language Recovery. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62, 3973-3985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Stockert, A., Wawrzyniak, M., Klingbeil, J., Wrede, K., Kümmerer, D., Hartwigsen, G., et al. (2020) Dynamics of Language Reorganization after Left Temporo-Parietal and Frontal Stroke. Brain, 143, 844-861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Singh, T., Phillip, L., Behroozmand, R., Gleichgerrcht, E., Piai, V., Fridriksson, J., et al. (2018) Pre-Articulatory Electrical Activity Associated with Correct Naming in Individuals with Aphasia. Brain and Language, 177, 1-6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Schlaug, G. (2018) Even When Right Is All That’s Left: There Are Still More Options for Recovery from Aphasia. Annals of Neurology, 83, 661-663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Keser, Z., Sebastian, R., Hasan, K.M. and Hillis, A.E. (2020) Right Hemispheric Homologous Language Pathways Negatively Predicts Poststroke Naming Recovery. Stroke, 51, 1002-1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 蓝昕语, 解光免. 脑卒中后失语症的康复治疗研究现状及新进展[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2023, 38(5): 708-712.
[18] Bhogal, S.K., Teasell, R. and Speechley, M. (2003) Intensity of Aphasia Therapy, Impact on Recovery. Stroke, 34, 987-993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Baliki, M.N., Babbitt, E.M. and Cherney, L.R. (2018) Brain Network Topology Influences Response to Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Treatment. Neuro Rehabilitation, 43, 63-76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Nenert, R., Allendorfer, J.B., Martin, A.M., Banks, C., Ball, A., Vannest, J., et al. (2017) Neuroimaging Correlates of Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation in a Pilot Randomized Trial of Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy. Medical Science Monitor, 23, 3489-3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Diener, B.L. and Bischof-Rosario, J.A. (2004) Determining Decision-Making Capacity in Individuals with Severe Communication Impairments after Stroke: The Role of Augmentative-Alternative Communication (AAC). Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 84-88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Pulvermüller, F., Neininger, B., Elbert, T., Mohr, B., Rockstroh, B., Koebbel, P., et al. (2001) Constraint-Induced Therapy of Chronic Aphasia after Stroke. Stroke, 32, 1621-1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Zhang, J., Yu, J., Bao, Y., Xie, Q., Xu, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2017) Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy in Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLOS ONE, 12, e0183349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Wang, G., Ge, L., Zheng, Q., Huang, P. and Xiang, J. (2020) Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy for Patients with Aphasia: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 7, 349-358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Vuksanović, J., Milovanović, T., Konstantinović, L. and Filipović, S.R. (2018) Effect of Type of Language Therapy on Expressive Language Skills in Patients with Post‐Stroke Aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53, 825-835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] 马斌, 柳刚, 宋书婷, 等. 针灸治疗卒中后失语症临床研究概况[J]. 甘肃中医药大学学报, 2025, 42(1): 72-77.
[27] 浦芳, 李佩芳. 针灸治疗脑卒中后失语临床研究进展[J]. 中医药临床杂志, 2021, 33(2): 387-391.
[28] 王启秀. 舌丛刺运动针法治疗中风后运动性失语的临床研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 沈阳: 辽宁中医药大学, 2025.
[29] 陈韵佳, 陈柱, 朱燕, 等. 神经调控技术在失语症治疗中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(8): 930-935.
[30] Xia, J., Chen, Y., Pei, S., Shan, C., Zhang, J., Zhou, Z., et al. (2025) Advances in Neuromodulation Techniques for Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Review. Medical Science Monitor, 31, e947213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[31] 浦创, 梁凡, 杨小玥, 等. 不同频率和刺激部位的重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中后运动性失语的临床研究[J]. 中国康复, 2025, 40(7): 412-417.
[32] 郭华平, 姚春雨, 葛云龙, 等. 低频重复经颅磁刺激联合旋律音调疗法治疗脑卒中后早期失语症的疗效观察[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2025, 47(11): 973-977.
[33] Low, T.A., Lindland, K., Kirton, A., Carlson, H.L., Harris, A.D., Goodyear, B.G., et al. (2025) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Multimodality Aphasia Therapy for Chronic Poststroke Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Neurology, 104, e213424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Rui, L. and Yuting, Z. (2026) Editorial: Advancements in Cognitive-Linguistic Rehabilitation of Post-Brain Injury: Mechanisms and Strategies. Frontiers in Neurology, 17, Article 1775280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[35] Wang, H., Wang, Y., Dong, J., Li, Y., Tian, S., Xing, J., et al. (2026) Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Naming Disorders in Poststroke Aphasia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 107, 287-298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] Johnson, M.A., Keser, Z., Lammers, B., Sydnor, M.J., Murter, J.L., Sadil, P., et al. (2026) White Matter Predictors of Cerebellar tDCS Treatment Effects in Aphasia Rehabilitation. Frontiers in Neurology, 17, Article 1659337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[37] Xu, X., Chen, S., Li, Z., Zhang, L., Pan, T., Long, S., et al. (2025) Efficacy of Cerebellar Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 10, 464-473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[38] Tavakoli, A.V. and Yun, K. (2017) Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Mechanisms and Protocols. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 11, Article 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Kasten, F.H., Dowsett, J. and Herrmann, C.S. (2016) Sustained Aftereffect of α-tACS Lasts up to 70 Min after Stimulation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, Article 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Cheung, C.Y., Kong, A.P. and Bakhtiar, M. (2025) Individualized Connectomic tACS Immediately Improves Oscillatory Network with Language Facilitation in Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Feasibility Study of a Dysfunctome-Based Targeting Approach. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 19, Article 1635497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[41] Escalon, M. (Principal Investigator) (2023) Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia (Identifier No. NCT05194566). ClinicalTrials.gov.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05194566
[42] Perelman, A., Hamilton, R. and Harvey, D. (2025) Tuning the Brain for Language: Exploring tACS as a Language Enhancement Tool. Neurology, 104, 5458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[43] Gao, X., Wang, Y., Chen, X. and Gao, S. (2021) Interface, Interaction, and Intelligence in Generalized Brain-Computer Interfaces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25, 671-684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Mak, J.N. and Wolpaw, J.R. (2009) Clinical Applications of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current State and Future Prospects. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2, 187-199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Ren, W. (2025) Brain-Computer Interface-Assisted Language Rehabilitation Technology for Aphasia Patients. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Food Science, SciTePress, 16-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[46] Branquinho, A.S., Maia, P. and Rodrigues, I.T. (2025) The Use of Brain Computer Interface in the Intervention of People with Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review. Sinapse, 25, 15-22.
[47] Deng, Q., Fu, Z., Ma, N. and Wang, B. (2025) Application and Future Directions of Brain-Computer Interfaces in Neurological Disorders: Technological Advances, Clinical Practices, and Challenges. Brain Hemorrhages, 6, 306-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[48] Liu, H., Betke, M., Ishwar, P. and Kiran, S. (2026) Machine Learning Driven “Therapy Calculator” for Self-Managed Digital Speech-Language Therapy for Individuals with Post-Stroke Aphasia.
[49] Liscano, Y., Bernal, L.M. and Díaz Vallejo, J.A. (2025) Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Digital Therapies for Post-Stroke Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences, 15, Article 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 

为你推荐