基于精英引导自适应差分协同小龙虾优化算法
Elite-Guided Adaptive Differential Cooperative Crayfish Optimization Algorithm
DOI: 10.12677/sea.2026.153038, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 张佳晨, 王宇轩, 丁 超, 徐进成, 孔维宾*:盐城工学院信息工程学院,江苏 盐城;李 阳:盐城工学院优培学院,江苏 盐城
关键词: 小龙虾优化算法精英反向学习差分进化精英保留Crayfish Optimization Algorithm Elite Opposition-Based Learning Differential Evolution Elite Preservation
摘要: 针对传统小龙虾优化算法(Crayfish Optimization Algorithm, COA)存在易早熟收敛、全局勘探与局部开发能力失衡、寻优精度不足等固有缺陷,本文提出一种基于精英引导自适应差分协同小龙虾优化算法(Elite-Guided Adaptive Differential Cooperative Crayfish Optimization Algorithm, EGCOA)。该算法首先采用精英反向学习机制完成种群初始化,提升初始解在解空间的分布均匀性与种群多样性,为算法寻优奠定优质起点;其次引入融合差分进化的繁殖策略实现个体位置迭代更新,同步兼顾算法的全局搜索速率与求解精度;最后提出带自适应扰动的精英保留策略,有效增强算法的局部深度开发能力,规避迭代过程中的早熟收敛问题。基于CEC2020基准测试函数集的仿真对比实验结果表明,所提EGCOA在收敛速度、寻优精度与运行鲁棒性上均显著优于原始COA及其他主流群智能优化算法,有效解决了原始算法的固有缺陷,具备更优异的综合优化性能。
Abstract: The Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (COA) suffers from three inherent drawbacks. It tends to converge prematurely, faces an imbalance between global exploration and local exploitation, and exhibits unsatisfactory optimization accuracy. To solve these problems, this paper proposes a Elite-Guided Adaptive Differential Cooperative Crayfish Optimization Algorithm (EGCOA). First, the algorithm adopts an elite opposition-based learning mechanism for population initialization. This mechanism improves the uniform distribution of initial solutions in the solution space and enriches population diversity, laying a high-quality starting point for the optimization process. Second, a breeding strategy integrated with differential evolution (DE) is introduced to update individual positions iteratively. This strategy balances the global search speed and solution accuracy of the algorithm simultaneously. Finally, an elite retention strategy with adaptive perturbation is designed. It effectively enhances the algorithm’s local deep exploitation capability, and avoids premature convergence during the iteration process. We carried out simulation comparison experiments based on the CEC2020 benchmark test function suite. The results show that the proposed EGCOA significantly outperforms the original COA and other mainstream swarm intelligence optimization algorithms in convergence speed, optimization accuracy, and operational robustness. It effectively overcomes the inherent defects of the original algorithm, and presents more excellent comprehensive optimization performance.
文章引用:张佳晨, 王宇轩, 丁超, 李阳, 徐进成, 孔维宾. 基于精英引导自适应差分协同小龙虾优化算法[J]. 软件工程与应用, 2026, 15(3): 404-411. https://doi.org/10.12677/sea.2026.153038

参考文献

[1] Yang, F., Wang, P., Zhang, Y., Zheng, L. and Lu, J. (2017) Survey of Swarm Intelligence Optimization Algorithms. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS), Beijing, 27-29 October 2017, 544-549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Jia, H., Rao, H., Wen, C. and Mirjalili, S. (2023) Crayfish Optimization Algorithm. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56, 1919-1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Heidari, A.A., Mirjalili, S., Faris, H., Aljarah, I., Mafarja, M. and Chen, H. (2019) Harris Hawks Optimization: Algorithm and Applications. Future Generation Computer Systems, 97, 849-872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Fu, X., Gou, Y. and Li, J. (2025) Broadband Impedance Matching Design Method for Dipole Acoustic Logging Transducer Based on Sparrow Search Algorithm. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 382, Article 116143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 易锌鑫, 张著洪. 改进型小龙虾优化算法设计与应用[J]. 集成电路应用, 2024, 41(11): 426-427.
[6] 徐勇, 赵文贺. 基于多种策略改进的小龙虾优化算法[J]. 信息技术与信息化, 2025(10): 36-40.
[7] Mahdavi, S., Rahnamayan, S. and Deb, K. (2018) Opposition Based Learning: A Literature Review. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 39, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Storn, R. and Price, K. (1997) Differential Evolution—A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11, 341-359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef