四川省高速公路网韧性分析
Analysis of the Resilience of Sichuan Expressway Network
DOI: 10.12677/mos.2026.156100, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 兰瑞意, 刘 博*, 陈 华:四川省交通运输发展战略和规划科学研究院,四川 成都
关键词: 韧性路径冗余性路网鲁棒性四川省高速公路网Resilience Route Redundancy Network Robustness Sichuan Expressway Network
摘要: 为进一步深入研究交通网络韧性的量化评估问题,本研究以四川省高速公路网为对象,采用基于L空间的网络构建方法建立拓扑模型,并引入高速公路实际O-D出行分布,从路径冗余性和路网鲁棒性两个维度开展韧性分析。研究结果表明:在路径冗余性方面,四川省高速公路的路径冗余性低于京津冀、长三角和粤港澳地区,并且21个市(州)之间存在较大差异,成都市高速公路网的平均冗余性处于中等水平。此外,当更多拓扑结构中的“圈”被有效路径使用时,路径冗余性会增加。在路网鲁棒性方面,四川省高速公路网在蓄意攻击策略下具备一定的鲁棒性,但在叠加交通流量后表现出对蓄意攻击的脆弱性。
Abstract: To further investigate the quantitative assessment of transportation network resilience, this study focuses on the Sichuan Province expressway network. A topology model is established using an L-space-based network construction method. On this basis, the actual O-D (origin-destination) travel distribution of the expressways is introduced to conduct resilience analysis from two dimensions: route redundancy and network robustness. The results indicate that, in terms of route redundancy, the Sichuan expressway network exhibits lower redundancy compared to the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, Yangtze River Delta, and Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao regions, with significant variations across the 21 cities, and the average redundancy of Chengdu’s expressway network ranks at a moderate level. Additionally, route diversity increases when more topological cycles are traversed by numerous alternative routes. In terms of network robustness, the Sichuan expressway network demonstrates a certain degree of robustness under intentional attack strategies, but when traffic flow is considered, it exhibits vulnerability to such attacks.
文章引用:兰瑞意, 刘博, 陈华. 四川省高速公路网韧性分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2026, 15(6): 135-145. https://doi.org/10.12677/mos.2026.156100

参考文献

[1] Cimellaro, G.P., Reinhorn, A.M. and Bruneau, M. (2010) Framework for Analytical Quantification of Disaster Resilience. Engineering Structures, 32, 3639-3649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Holling, C.S. (1973) Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1-23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Wears, R.L. (2006) Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15, 447-448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Rose, A. (2004) Defining and Measuring Economic Resilience to Disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 13, 307-314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Murray-Tuite, P.M. (2006) A Comparison of Transportation Network Resilience under Simulated System Optimum and User Equilibrium Conditions. Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Monterey, 3-6 December 2006, 1398-1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Heaslip, K., Louisell, W., Collura, J., et al. (2010) A Sketch Level Method for Assessing Transportation Network Resiliency to Natural Disasters and Man-Made Events. Proceedings of the 89th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 10-14 January 2010, 15 p.
https://trid.trb.org/View/910940
[7] Freckleton, D., Heaslip, K., Luoisell, W., et al. (2012) Evaluation of Transportation Network Resiliency with Consideration for Disaster Magnitude.
[8] House, TW. (2013) Presidential Policy Directive—Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience. White House Press Releases Fact Sheets and Briefings/FIND.
[9] Xu, X., Chen, A., Jansuwan, S., Yang, C. and Ryu, S. (2018) Transportation Network Redundancy: Complementary Measures and Computational Methods. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 114, 68-85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Zang, Z., Xu, X., Chen, A. and Yang, C. (2021) Modeling the α-Max Capacity of Transportation Networks: A Single-Level Mathematical Programming Formulation. Transportation, 49, 1211-1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Xu, X., Chen, A. and Yang, C. (2018) An Optimization Approach for Deriving Upper and Lower Bounds of Transportation Network Vulnerability under Simultaneous Disruptions of Multiple Links. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 94, 338-353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Zhao, R., Xu, X. and Chen, A. (2022) Alternative Method of Counting the Number of Efficient Paths in a Transportation Network. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 18, 1207-1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 区俊锋. 公路网网络抗毁性分析及优化研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2021.
[14] 温振国. 基于复杂网络理论的陕西省高速公路网结构特性及鲁棒性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 长安大学, 2019.
[15] 郑义彬, 蔡航鹏, 赖伟伟, 等. 基于复杂网络的湖北省高速公路网特性分析[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(5): 31-37.
[16] Bruneau, M., Chang, S.E., Eguchi, R.T., Lee, G.C., O’Rourke, T.D., Reinhorn, A.M., et al. (2003) A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities. Earthquake Spectra, 19, 733-752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Jing, W., Xu, X. and Pu, Y. (2019) Route Redundancy-Based Network Topology Measure of Metro Networks. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019, 1-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Leurent, F.M. (1997) Curbing the Computational Difficulty of the Logit Equilibrium Assignment Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 31, 315-326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 史春辉. 复杂网络拓扑结构抗毁性研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2012.