实际家庭亲密度与适应性对大学生传统婚恋观的影响:依恋焦虑的遮掩效应及性别的调节
Actual Family Cohesion and Adaptability and Traditional Views on Love and Marriage among College Students: The Suppressing Effect of Attachment Anxiety and Gender Differences
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.166324, PDF,   
作者: 余静文:云南师范大学心理学院,云南 昆明;罗艳婷:首都师范大学心理学院,北京;吴孺幸, 褚成静*:广东医科大学人文与管理学院,广东 东莞;吴锦婷:广东医科大学生物医学工程学院,广东 东莞
关键词: 实际家庭亲密度实际家庭适应性依恋焦虑婚恋观遮掩效应Actual Family Cohesion Actual Family Adaptability Attachment Anxiety Views on Love and Marriage The Suppressing Effect
摘要: 目的:本研究旨在探讨实际家庭亲密度与适应性对大学生传统婚恋观的影响,并检验依恋焦虑在其中的遮掩效应(suppressing effect)以及性别的调节作用。方法:采用家庭亲密度和适应性量表、亲密关系经历量表及大学生婚恋观问卷,通过对482名大学生进行问卷调查。结果:(1) 实际家庭亲密度与适应性均能正向预测大学生传统婚恋观;(2) 依恋焦虑在实际家庭亲密度/适应性与传统婚恋观之间起遮掩效应,即实际家庭亲密度与适应性通过负向影响依恋焦虑,间接削弱了大学生的传统婚恋观;(3) 性别调节了依恋焦虑与传统婚恋观的关系,相较于男生,女生的依恋焦虑对其传统婚恋观的正向预测作用更为显著,且遮掩型有调节的中介效应仅存在于女生群体中。结论:家庭功能通过两条路径影响婚恋观:一是直接的代际传递,强化传统观念;二是通过降低依恋焦虑,间接促进现代观念的形成,且该心理机制存在显著的性别差异。
Abstract: To explore the influence of actual family cohesion and adaptability on college students’ views on love and marriage, and to examine the suppressing effect of attachment anxiety as well as the moderating role of gender. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 482 college students using the Family Cohesion and Adaptability Scale, the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale, and the College Students’ Views on Love and Marriage Questionnaire. The results showed that: (1) Actual family cohesion and Actual family adaptability each positively predicted traditional marriage and love attitudes among college students. (2) Attachment anxiety served as a suppressor in these relationships. Actual Family Cohesion and Adaptability were negatively associated with attachment anxiety, thereby indirectly weakening traditional attitudes. (3) Gender moderated the link between attachment anxiety and traditional marriage and love attitudes; the positive prediction was stronger in females. The suppressive moderated mediation effect was significant only in the female subgroup. Family functioning not only directly reinforces the intergenerational transmission of traditional views on marriage and love, but also promotes the formation of more modern and open attitudes by reducing attachment anxiety. Furthermore, this psychological mechanism exhibits significant gender differences.
文章引用:余静文, 罗艳婷, 吴孺幸, 吴锦婷, 褚成静 (2026). 实际家庭亲密度与适应性对大学生传统婚恋观的影响:依恋焦虑的遮掩效应及性别的调节. 心理学进展, 16(6), 364-378. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.166324

参考文献

[1] 陈斌, 王艳(2023). 谁更愿意选择读博——一项关于女性读博意愿影响因素的研究. 重庆高教研究, 11(6), 53-64.
[2] 陈红艳, 申凡(2017). 大学生婚恋观与家庭亲密度及适应性的关系研究. 中国性科学, 26(10), 146-149.
[3] 戴晓阳(2010). 常用心理评估量表手册. 人民军医出版社.
[4] 计迎春, 赵猛, 韦熠(2025). 中国婚姻制度变迁的日常生活逻辑——当代青年婚恋观的社会学研究. 妇女研究论丛, (6), 13-28.
[5] 金燕娜(2026). 城市单数青年养宠行为与婚育观念的关系及作用机制.
https://link.cnki.net/urlid/44.1022.D.20260402.1506.002
[6] 李同归, 加藤和生(2006). 成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ECR)中文版. 心理学报, (3), 399-406.
[7] 刘振亮, 刘田田, 沐守宽(2021). 遮掩效应的统计分析框架及其应用. 心理技术与应用, 9(10), 610-618.
[8] 陆爱桃, 张积家, Michael Harris Bond, 张学新(2012). 情侣依恋与情感投入: 性别的调节作用. 心理科学, 35(3), 654-658.
[9] 毛旭阳, 刘翱瑜(2026). 大学生婚恋观现状、影响因素及对策研究——以西安某学院为例. 黑龙江科学, 17(1), 155-157.
[10] 潘丹青, 翟成蹊, 欧阳瑞婷, 王冉, 山毓娥, 郭昌隆, 等(2023). 大学生依恋焦虑和怀疑伴侣心理出轨的关系: 有调节的中介模型. 心理学进展, 13(10), 4506-4515.
[11] 苏红(2006). 大学生婚恋观结构、特点及影响因素研究. 硕士学位论文, 重庆: 西南大学.
[12] 苏红, 任永进(2008). 国内外大学生婚恋观研究综述. 河南职业技术师范学院学报(职业教育版), (2), 81-83, 107.
[13] 苏微, 方晓义, 侯娟(2026). 心相应, 爱相随: 夫妻相似性与婚姻满意度. 心理学报, 58(2), 350-361.
[14] 王苗(2025). 大学生家庭功能与人际交往效能感之间的关系: 成人依恋的中介作用. 心理学进展, 15(1), 363-374.
[15] 王晓丹(2007). 近代中国社会转型与女性婚恋观的变迁. 牡丹江大学学报, (2), 33-35.
[16] 张勤, 王健(2024). 父母婚姻及家庭环境对青年学生结婚意愿的影响. 科研项目论坛, 2(9), 102-105.
[17] 赵秀娟(2007). 浅析大学生健康爱情观的培养. 科教文汇(上旬刊), (19), 28.
[18] 周浩, 龙立荣(2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[19] Amato, P. R. (1996). Explaining the Intergenerational Transmission of Divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 628-640.[CrossRef
[20] Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall.
[21] Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment Styles among Young Adults: A Test of a Four-Category Model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244.[CrossRef
[22] Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
[23] Cunningham, M. (2001). The Influence of Parental Attitudes and Behaviors on Children’s Attitudes toward Gender and Household Labor in Early Adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 111-122.[CrossRef
[24] Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex Differences in Romantic Attachment: A Meta-Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193-214.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Grusec, J. E., & Goodnow, J. J. (1994). Impact of Parental Discipline Methods on the Child’s Internalization of Values: A Reconceptualization of Current Points of View. Developmental Psychology, 30, 4-19.[CrossRef
[26] Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.[CrossRef
[27] Keijer, M. G., Liefbroer, A. C., & Nagel, I. (2018). Adolescents’ Expectations about the Timing of Family Life Events: Unraveling the Role of Value Transmission and Modeling. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 3755-3777.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Kenny, M. E., & Donaldson, G. A. (1991). Contributions of Parental Attachment and Family Structure to the Social and Psychological Functioning of First-Year College Students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 479-486.[CrossRef
[29] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The Attachment Behavioral System in Adulthood: Activation, Psychodynamics, and Interpersonal Processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 53-152.[CrossRef
[30] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (p. 578). Guilford Press.
[31] Musick, K. (2002). Planned and Unplanned Childbearing among Unmarried Women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 915-929.[CrossRef
[32] Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (2010). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: I. Cohesion and Adaptability Dimensions, Family Types, and Clinical Applications. Family Process, 18, 3-28.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[33] Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.[CrossRef
[34] Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I. et al. (2003). Are Men Universally More Dismissing than Women? Gender Differences in Romantic Attachment across 62 Cultural Regions. Personal Relationships, 10, 307-331.[CrossRef
[35] Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1986). Sexual Scripts: Permanence and Change. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 15, 97-120.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Simpson, J. A. (1990). Influence of Attachment Styles on Romantic Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971-980.[CrossRef