整合性视角下大学生心理危机防治的理论反思与体系重构
Theoretical Reflection and Systemic Reconstruction of College Students’ Psychological Crisis Prevention and Intervention from an Integrative Perspective
DOI: 10.12677/ap.2026.166325, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 房津如, 王义利, 刘春雨:烟台大学心理应用研究所,山东 烟台;周 娟:烟台大学学生工作处,山东 烟台
关键词: 大学生心理危机整合性视角生态系统理论“意念–行为”框架College Students’ Psychological Crisis Integrative Perspective Ecological Systems Theory “Ideation-Action” Framework
摘要: 大学生心理危机已成为高校心理健康工作的重大挑战,现有以终端干预为主的防治模式存在多主体协同不足、系统联动不畅等局限。研究以生态系统理论为宏观分析框架,以“意念–行为”框架为核心机制解释模型,对当前高校学生心理危机防治体系进行理论反思与体系重构。研究提出从“终端干预”转向“全程防护”的大学生心理危机防治体系优化路径,涵盖源头预防、精准干预、持续支持三个核心阶段,强化个体、家庭、学校、社会多元主体协同参与。整合性视角下的大学生心理危机防治体系强调多主体协同与全周期服务,为提升我国高校心理危机预防干预实效提供了理论支撑与实践启示。
Abstract: College student psychological crisis has become a major challenge in university mental health work, with existing prevention models characterized by terminal intervention suffering from insufficient multi-agent collaboration and systemic coordination. The study adopts ecosystem theory as the macro-analytical framework and the ideation-action framework as the core mechanism to explain the model, conducting theoretical reflection and system reconstruction on the current psychological crisis prevention and intervention system for college students. The study proposes an optimized path for the psychological crisis prevention and intervention system for college students, shifting from “terminal intervention” to “whole-process protection”. This path encompasses three core stages: source prevention, precise intervention, and continuous support, strengthening the collaborative participation of multiple entities including individuals, families, schools, and society. From an integrated perspective, the psychological crisis prevention and intervention system for college students emphasizes multi-entities collaboration and full-cycle services, providing theoretical support and practical insights for enhancing the effectiveness of psychological crisis prevention and intervention in Chinese universities.
文章引用:房津如, 王义利, 周娟, 刘春雨 (2026). 整合性视角下大学生心理危机防治的理论反思与体系重构. 心理学进展, 16(6), 379-388. https://doi.org/10.12677/ap.2026.166325

参考文献

[1] 高红娜, 成雨彤(2025). 高校大学生心理危机预警防控体系构建研究——基于群体特质与需求分析. 科学咨询, (7), 45-49.
[2] 李彬, 李文洁, 张利萍(2026). 大学生心理危机协同干预“教联体”内在逻辑、运行策略与实践进路——基于交叠影响域理论. 四川职业技术学院学报, 36(2), 61-67.
[3] 刘海娟, 李焰, 白学军, 马喜亭(2026). 新时代我国高校心理健康教育发展状况及对策建议. 心理与行为研究, 24(1), 1-9.
[4] 刘依馨, 张尚, 杨丽, 王丽莉(2024). 大学生自杀意念及其近端风险因素的短期动态变化探索: 基于自杀人际理论. 中国临床心理学杂志, 32(1), 32-38.
[5] 苏斌原, 郭蒨岚, 谢滨如, 张卫(2024). 大学生自杀潜在风险的测量指标: 个人中心分析的视角. 心理发展与教育, 40(4), 572-588.
[6] 魏葫(2026). 精神动力学视角下家校医社协同干预大学生心理危机的机制研究. 西部素质教育, 12(3), 1-5.
[7] 吴才智, 江光荣, 段文婷(2018). 我国大学生自杀现状与对策研究. 黑龙江高教研究, (5), 95-99.
[8] 徐颖(2021). 家庭累积风险对中晚期青少年自杀意念发展轨迹的影响及有调节的中介效应研究. 硕士学位论文, 武汉: 华中师范大学.
[9] 薛朝霞, 任子媛, 荆雷, 李慧(2024). 大学生自杀行为影响因素的分类决策树分析. 心理发展与教育, 40(3), 421-430.
[10] 杨振斌, 李焰(2015). 大学生非正常死亡现象的分析. 心理与行为研究, 13(5), 698-701.
[11] 郑志欣(2026). 从危机干预到成长赋能: 高校心理教育“五步进阶”理论模型建构. 重庆科技报, 2(13), 1-2.
[12] Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Harvard University Press.[CrossRef
[13] Klonsky, E. D., & May, A. M. (2015). The Three-Step Theory (3ST): A New Theory of Suicide Rooted in the “Ideation-to-Action” Framework. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 8, 114-129.[CrossRef
[14] Matsubara, T., Yamamoto, N., Chen, C., Okuya, S., & Nakagawa, S. (2021). A 26-Year Retrospective Survey on Suicide Cases of Students at Yamaguchi University (1992-2017): Risk Factors and the Role of the Health Administration Center. Psychiatry Research, 295, Article 113566.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] O’Connor, R. C., & Nock, M. K. (2014). The Psychology of Suicidal Behaviour. The Lancet Psychiatry, 1, 73-85.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010). The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide. Psychological Review, 117, 575-600.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Witte, T. K., Gould, M. S., Munfakh, J. L. H., Kleinman, M., Joiner, T. E., & Kalafat, J. (2010). Assessing Suicide Risk among Callers to Crisis Hotlines: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 941-964.[CrossRef] [PubMed]