祁门方言“掉”的语法化与主观化研究——兼与普通话比较
Grammaticalization and Subjectification of “diao” in Qimen Dialect—With a Comparison to Mandarin
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.146601, PDF,   
作者: 黄若晨:安徽大学外语学院,安徽 合肥
关键词: 祁门方言语法化主观化“掉”Qimen Dialect Grammaticalization Subjectification “diao”
摘要: 本文考察祁门方言“掉”的语法化与主观化现象。研究发现:“掉”的语法化路径为结果补语→完整体标记→主观完成标记,其分布受“可控任务 vs 自然变化”认知范畴制约,修正了前人“积极/消极”分类,与普通话相比,祁门方言“掉”语法化程度更高,发展出句末体标记和主观评价功能,主观化动因包括句末位置固化、“总算/终于”高频共现诱发的语用推理、语义滞留及系统背景。本研究为汉语方言主观化提供了新案例。
Abstract: This paper investigates the grammaticalization and subjectification of diao in the Qimen dialect. The findings reveal that the grammaticalization path of diao follows the trajectory: resultative complement → perfective marker → subjective perfective marker. Its distribution is constrained by the cognitive category of “controllable task vs. natural change”, refining the previous “positive/negative” classification. Compared with Mandarin, the Qimen dialect exhibits a higher degree of grammaticalization, having developed a sentence-final perfective marker and a subjective evaluative function. The driving factors of subjectification include the fixation of the sentence-final position, pragmatic inference induced by the high-frequency co-occurrence with zongsuan/zhongyu (finally), semantic persistence, and systemic background. This study provides a new case study for subjectification in Chinese dialects.
文章引用:黄若晨. 祁门方言“掉”的语法化与主观化研究——兼与普通话比较[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(6): 929-938. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.146601

参考文献

[1] 陈瑶, 陈泽平. 安徽祁门方言完成体标记“着” “失” “掉”[J]. 方言, 2018, 40(2): 191-200.
[2] 王丹荣. “V掉”的意义虚化与“掉”的虚化机制[J]. 理论月刊, 2014(10): 66-69.
[3] 刘焱. “V掉”的语义类型与“掉”的虚化[J]. 中国语文, 2007(2): 133-143+191-192.
[4] 徐时仪. “掉”的词义衍变递嬗探微[J]. 语言研究, 2007(4): 57-61.
[5] 王健. 苏皖方言中“掉”类词的共时表现与语法化等级[J]. 语言科学, 2010, 9(2): 187-196.
[6] 冯冬梅, 宗守云. 博白永安地老话多功能语法成分“掉”及其演化历程[J]. 广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2017, 53(5): 87-93.
[7] 董秀芳. “是”的进一步语法化: 由虚词到词内成分[J]. 当代语言学, 2004(1): 35-44+94.
[8] 吴福祥. 关于语法化的单向性问题[J]. 当代语言学, 2003(4): 307-322+379.
[9] 吴福祥. 近年来语法化研究的进展[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2004(1): 18-24.
[10] 吴福祥. 汉语语法化演变的几个类型学特征[J]. 中国语文, 2005(6): 483-494+575.
[11] Traugott, E.C. (1995) Subjectification in Grammaticalization. In: Stein, D. and Wright, S., Eds., Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Cambridge University Press, 31-54.
[12] Bybee, J., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W. (1994) The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. University of Chicago Press.
[13] 董秀芳. 词汇化与话语标记的形成[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2007, 21(1): 50-61.
[14] 沈家煊. 语用原则、语用推理和语义演变[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2004(4): 243-251+321.
[15] 方梅. 指示词“这”和“那”在北京话中的语法化[J]. 中国语文, 2002(4): 343-356+382-383.
[16] 高军, 张晨雅. “掉”的语义演变及语法化进程[J]. 新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2024, 52(1): 145-149.