准噶尔盆地深层煤岩特征及含气量测井解释方法研究——以滴南–白家海区块西山窑组、八道湾组煤岩为例
Characteristics of Deep Coal Rock and Logging-Based Interpretation Method for Gas Content—A Case Study of the Xishanyao and Badaowan Formations in the Dinan-Baijiahai Block, Junggar Basin
DOI: 10.12677/jogt.2026.482037, PDF,   
作者: 尹 奇:成都理工大学能源学院(页岩气现代产业学院),四川 成都;胡梦蝶:国家管网集团储能技术有限公司,上海
关键词: 准噶尔盆地深层煤岩煤岩特征含气量测井解释评价Junggar Basin Deep Coal Rock Coal Rock Characteristics Total Gas Content Logging Interpretation and Evaluation
摘要: 深层煤岩气为非常规油气开采领域的热点,但存在煤岩特征不清以及基于浅层煤层气储层含气量测井评价模型精度低等问题,亟需开展煤岩特征及含气量测井解释评价方法研究。以准噶尔盆地滴南–白家海区块侏罗系西山窑组、八道湾组深层煤岩为研究对象,综合岩心、物性以及扫描电镜等分析化验资料,系统研究煤岩的煤阶、宏观煤岩类型、工业组分、孔–裂隙特征、物性以及含气性等特征,建立深层煤岩含气量测井解释评价模型。结果表明:(1) 研究区煤岩镜质体反射率介于0.43%~0.85%之间,主要为长焰煤和气煤,属中低煤阶。西山窑组主要为半暗–半亮型煤,结构以原生–碎裂结构为主;八道湾组煤岩以半亮–光亮型为主,主要发育原生结构;(2) 西山窑组为低–中挥发分、特低灰分、中–高固定碳煤;八道湾组为中–高挥发分、低灰分、低–中固定碳煤;(3) 储集空间类型以胞腔孔、气孔和裂隙为主,其中裂隙以割理及微裂缝为主;(4) 西山窑组煤岩孔隙率介于10.48%~21.47%之间,平均值为15.71%,渗透率介于(0.98~23.82) × 103 μm2之间,平均值为6.67 × 103 μm2,属中–高孔隙率、中–高渗透率储层;八道湾组煤岩孔隙率介于0.95%~3.88%之间,平均值为3.00%,渗透率介于(0.0044~0.0681) × 103 μm2之间,平均值为0.028 × 103 μm2,属低孔–低渗类储层;(5)优选敏感测井曲线,构建西山窑组、八道湾组深层煤岩总含气量复合参数(GxGb)。根据总含气量与复合参数的关系,建立含气量测井解释模型。相较于多元线性回归模型,采用复合参数的含气量测井解释模型,表现出较高的准确性和良好的适用性,应用前景较好。
Abstract: Deep coal-rock gas has become a research focus in the field of unconventional oil and gas exploitation. However, challenges remain, including insufficient understanding of coal-rock characteristics and low accuracy of gas content logging evaluation model derived from shallow coalbed methane reservoirs. Consequently, it is urgent to carry out research on coal-rock characteristics and logging interpretation method for gas content evaluation. This study investigates the deep coal seams of the Jurassic Xishanyao and Badaowan Formations in the Dinan-Baijiahai block of the Junggar Basin. The coal rank, macroscopic coal rock type, maceral composition, pore-fracture characteristics, physical properties and gas content of coal rock are systematically studied by integrating the analysis and test data of core, physical properties and scanning electron microscope. The logging interpretation and evaluation model for gas content in deep coal rock is established. The results show that: (1) The vitrinite reflectance of the coal rock ranges from 0.43% to 0.85%, corresponding to long-flame and gas coals of medium to low coal rank. The Xishanyao Formation is characterized by semi-dark to semi-bright coal with primary-fragmentation structure. The coal rock of Badaowan Formation is mainly semi-bright to bright coal with preserved primary structure. (2) The Xishanyao Formation coals exhibit low to medium volatile matter, ultra-low ash yield, and medium to high fixed carbon content. In contrast, the Badaowan Formation coals are characterized by medium to high volatile matter, low ash yield, and low to medium fixed carbon content. (3) The types of reservoir space are primarily composed of cellular pores, gas pores and fractures, among which cleats and microcracks are the dominant fracture typs. (4) The porosity of Xishanyao Formation rangs from 10.48% to 21.47%, with an average of 15.71%, and the permeability ranges from 0.98 × 103 μm2 to 23.82 × 103 μm2, with an average of 6.67 × 103 μm2, indicating a medium-high porosity and permeability reservoir. The porosity of coal rock in Badaowan Formation ranges from 0.95% to 3.88%, with an average of 3.00%, and the permeability ranges from 0.0044 × 103 μm2 to 0.0681 × 103 μm2, with an average of 0.028 × 103 μm2, indicating a low porosity and permeability reservoir. (5) Sensitive logging curves are optimized to construct composite parameters (Gx for Xishanyao Formation and Gb for Badaowan Formation) representing the total gas conten in deep coal rock. Based on the relationship between total gas content and these composite parameters, a gas content logging interpretation model is established. Compared with the multiple linear regression model, the proposed composite-parameter model demonstrates superior accuracy and good applicability, suggesting promising potential for feild application.
文章引用:尹奇, 胡梦蝶. 准噶尔盆地深层煤岩特征及含气量测井解释方法研究——以滴南–白家海区块西山窑组、八道湾组煤岩为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2026, 48(2): 317-331. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2026.482037

参考文献

[1] 刘得光, 罗晓静, 万敏, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部煤层气成藏因素及勘探目标[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2010, 31(4): 349-351.
[2] 邢丽茹, 张洲, 任峻杉, 等. 准噶尔盆地深部与浅部煤层气储层物性特征对比分析[J]. 中国煤炭, 2024, 50(9): 9-17.
[3] 李雪彬, 金力新, 陈超峰, 等. 深层煤岩气水平井压裂关键技术-以准噶尔盆地白家海地区侏罗系为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 629-637.
[4] 赵喆, 杨威, 赵振宇, 等. 中国煤成气地质理论研究进展与重点勘探领域[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(6): 1240-1253.
[5] 郭绪杰, 支东明, 毛新军, 等. 准噶尔盆地煤岩气的勘探发现及意义[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(6): 38-49.
[6] 李道清, 陈永波, 杨东, 等. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系西山窑组煤岩气“甜点”储层智能综合预测技术[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(6): 23-35.
[7] Cheng, Y., Jiang, H., Zhang, X., Cui, J., Song, C. and Li, X. (2017) Effects of Coal Rank on Physicochemical Properties of Coal and on Methane Adsorption. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 4, 129-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] 余琪祥, 罗宇, 曹倩, 等. 准噶尔盆地东北缘深层煤层气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(5): 888-899.
[9] 杨兆彪, 李存磊, 郭巧珍, 等. 新疆准噶尔盆地白家海凸起深部煤层气不同赋存态分配规律[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2025, 54(1): 127-137.
[10] 程长领, 刘华, 纪雪冰, 等. 准噶尔盆地中部4区块侏罗系西山窑组煤岩特征及成煤环境[J]. 地质科学, 2025, 60(2): 474-483.
[11] 徐茂轩, 杜文凤, 赫云兰, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘低煤阶煤层气富集区三维地震预测[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2023, 8(5): 593-599.
[12] 孙斌, 杨敏芳, 田文广, 等. 准噶尔盆地深部煤层气开发潜力分析[C]//中国石油学会石油地质专业委员会, 中国煤炭学会煤层气专业委员会, 煤层气产业技术创新战略联盟. 煤层气勘探开发技术新进展——2018年全国煤层气学术研讨会论文集. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2018: 163-174.
[13] 王鹏翔, 张洲, 余婉莹, 等. 深/浅部煤储层孔裂隙结构及三维空间分布差异特征——以准噶尔盆地为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(2): 227-236.
[14] 李勇, 徐凤银, 唐书恒, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地煤层(岩)气勘探开发进展及发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(10): 63-79.
[15] 王安龙. 煤层气测井资料建模及其应用评价研究[J]. 中国煤层气, 2014, 11(4): 31-35.
[16] 侯颉, 邹长春, 杨玉卿, 等. 测井解释中煤层含气量评价方法对比研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2015, 43(12): 157-161+156.
[17] 刘国伟, 张涛, 韩文龙. 基于常规测井的煤层含气量研究[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2017, 43(2): 20-21.
[18] 孙云川. 关于煤层含气量的测井综合评价方法[J]. 能源技术与管理, 2019, 44(3): 148-150.
[19] 陈涛, 张占松, 周雪晴, 等. 基于测井参数优选的煤层含气量预测模型[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(3): 227-235+243.
[20] 刘荣芳, 王建功, 刘文华, 等. 基于煤岩结构的煤层含气量测井评价方法[J]. 中国煤层气, 2014, 11(4): 22-25.
[21] 石玉江, 何羽飞, 万金彬, 等. 深层煤岩气地质品质及含气量测井评价方法研究[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2024, 29(4): 126-141.
[22] 陈国军, 李军红, 张文芊, 等. 深层中低煤阶储层煤层气含量测井计算方法[J]. 新疆地质, 2024, 42(3): 385-391.
[23] Shao, X., Sun, Y., Sun, J., Tang, D., Xu, H., Dong, X., et al. (2013) Log Interpretation for Coal Petrologic Parameters: A Case Study of Hancheng Mining Area, Central China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 40, 599-605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Liu, D., Zhao, Z., Cai, Y. and Sun, F. (2024) Characterizing Coal Gas Reservoirs: A Multiparametric Evaluation Based on Geological and Geophysical Methods. Gondwana Research, 133, 91-107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] 汤达祯, 杨曙光, 唐淑玲, 等. 准噶尔盆地煤层气勘探开发与地质研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(8): 2412-2425.
[26] 项威, 蒋文龙, 刘超威, 等. 准噶尔盆地白家海凸起侏罗系煤岩气地球化学特征与成因[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2025, 36(2): 367-379.
[27] 毛新军, 李艳平, 梁则亮, 等. 准噶尔盆地侏罗系煤岩气成藏条件及勘探潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2024, 29(4): 31-43.
[28] 杨海波, 陈磊, 孔玉华. 准噶尔盆地构造单元划分新方案[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2004(6): 686-688.
[29] 龚德瑜, 周川闽, 齐雪峰, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部多类型天然气的发现与勘探启示[J]. 地质学报, 2024, 98(4): 1263-1278.
[30] 付永红, 能源, 邢向杰, 等. 准噶尔盆地西北缘大侏罗沟走滑断裂带分层、分段变形特征及形成演化过程[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2025, 49(6): 1349-1366.
[31] 李建忠, 王小军, 杨帆, 等. 准噶尔盆地中央坳陷西部下组合油气成藏模式及勘探前景[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(5): 1059-1072.
[32] 胡鑫, 姚卫江, 胡正舟, 等. 准噶尔盆地白家海地区西山窑组深部煤岩储层孔隙结构表征及发育主控因素[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(4): 12-23.
[33] Zhao, Z., Yang, W., Zhao, Z., Xu, W., Gong, D., Jin, H., et al. (2024) Research Progresses in Geological Theory and Key Exploration Areas of Coal-Formed Gas in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 51, 1435-1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] 兰浩, 杨兆彪, 仇鹏, 等. 新疆准噶尔盆地白家海凸起深部煤层气勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2024, 52(2): 13-22.
[35] 康永尚, 皇甫玉慧, 张兵, 等. 含煤盆地深层“超饱和”煤层气形成条件[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(12): 1426-1438.
[36] 李国欣, 张水昌, 何海清, 等. 煤岩气: 概念、内涵与分类标准[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(4): 783-795.
[37] 陈国军, 潘拓, 张帆, 等. 深层中低煤阶煤层气产能分类评价方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(1): 71-78.
[38] 刘新社, 黄道军, 虎建玲, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部地区石炭系本溪组煤岩气储层特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(10): 51-62.