基于HIAD2.2数据库的输氢管道风险因素研究
Research on Risk Factors of Hydrogen Transmission Pipelines Based on the HIAD2.2 Database
摘要: 本研究基于欧洲HySafe网络开发的氢气事件与事故数据库(HIAD 2.2),采用初步危害分析(PreHA)方法,对过去50年间记录的44起输氢管道事故进行了系统的风险评估。研究首先对事故数据进行了统计分析,包括事故的年度分布、国家分布、原因分类和后果类型。分析发现,火灾是氢气管道事故最主要的后果,而材料/制造缺陷和管理因素是主要的已知原因。随后,研究运用PreHA框架,识别并评估了几个关键危害因素,包括腐蚀与材料降解(评级为1A,灾难性且频繁)、焊接问题(评级为1B,灾难性且可能)、机械完整性与操作故障(2C)、自然灾害(1D)以及土木与建筑工程(3D)。研究旨在揭示导致氢气管道事故的关键风险因素,并强调持续改进安全管理实践的重要性,为发展可持续氢经济提供安全保障。
Abstract: This study conducted a systematic risk assessment of 44 hydrogen pipeline accidents recorded over the past 50 years, using the Preliminary Hazard Analysis (PreHA) method and data from the Hydrogen Incident and Accident Database (HIAD 2.2) developed by the European HySafe network. A statistical analysis was first performed on the accident data, covering annual distribution, country distribution, cause classification, and consequence type. The analysis revealed that fire is the predominant consequence of hydrogen pipeline accidents, while material/manufacturing defects and management factors are the main known causes. Subsequently, the PreHA framework was applied to identify and evaluate several key hazard factors, including corrosion and material degradation (rated 1A, catastrophic and frequent), welding issues (rated 1B, catastrophic and probable), mechanical integrity and operational failure (2C), natural hazards (1D), and civil and construction works (3D). This research aims to identify the critical risk factors contributing to hydrogen pipeline accidents and emphasize the importance of continuous improvement in safety management practices, thereby providing safety assurance for the development of a sustainable hydrogen economy.
文章引用:吴禧阳, 梁立龙, 余钦锋. 基于HIAD2.2数据库的输氢管道风险因素研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2026, 48(2): 332-342. https://doi.org/10.12677/jogt.2026.482038

参考文献

[1] 孙宝翔, 杨静. 推进输氢管道建设, 助力氢能产业健康发展[N]. 中国石化报, 2023-03-06(8).
[2] 杨静, 薛倩, 周立国. 输氢管道安全与运维管理技术探讨[J]. 炼油技术与工程, 2025, 55(12): 26-29.
[3] Rigas, F. and Amyotte, P.R. (2013) Myths and Facts about Hydrogen Hazards. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 31, 913-918.
[4] 梅苑, 吕志阳, 帅义, 等. 掺氢条件下X80管道钢的氢脆敏感性研究[J]. 油气与新能源, 2026, 38(2): 45-55.
[5] 李磊. 室内掺氢天然气管道泄露扩散模型及安全检测的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2025.
[6] 李凤, 董绍华, 陈林, 等. 掺氢天然气长距离管道输送安全关键技术与进展[J]. 力学与实践, 2023, 45(2): 230-244.
[7] Jeong, H.S., Abraham, D.M. and Lew, J.J. (2003) Pipeline Damage Prevention Systems. New Pipeline Technologies, Security, and Safety, 1429-1437.
[8] Campari, A., Nakhal Akel, A.J., Ustolin, F., Alvaro, A., Ledda, A., Agnello, P., et al. (2023) Lessons Learned from HIAD 2.0: Inspection and Maintenance to Avoid Hydrogen-Induced Material Failures. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 173, Article ID: 108199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Badia, E., Navajas, J., Sala, R., Paltrinieri, N. and Sato, H. (2024) Analysis of Hydrogen Value Chain Events: Implications for Hydrogen Refueling Stations’ Safety. Safety, 10, Article No. 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Tunç, M. and Solmaz, R. (2025) Occupational Health and Safety Assessment of Hydrogen Transport by Trucks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 144, 851-859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Yan, F. and Xu, K. (2019) Methodology and Case Study of Quantitative Preliminary Hazard Analysis Based on Cloud Model. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 60, 116-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Tunç, M. and Solmaz, R. (2024) A Preliminary Hazard Analysis in Bee Pollen and Propolis Decontamination Process: From the Beehive to the Laboratory. Food Control, 163, Article ID: 110487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Department of Defense Standard Practice (2012) System Safety.
https://mail.system-safety.org/Documents/MIL-STD-882E.pdf
[14] Lowesmith, B.J. and Hankinson, G. (2012) Large Scale High Pressure Jet Fires Involving Natural Gas and Natural Gas/Hydrogen Mixtures. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 90, 108-120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Kubota, M., Komoda, R., Cui, X., Wakabayashi, H. and Tanaka, Y. (2019) Effects of Hydrogen and Weld Defect on Tensile Properties of SUH660 and SUS316L Welded Joints. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 8, 713-718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef