扩展意义单位分析的应用研究:以“Identity”为例
An Applied Study of Extended Units of Meaning: Taking “Identity” as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/ml.2026.146599, PDF,   
作者: 田靖潇:浙江工商大学外国语学院,浙江 杭州
关键词: Identity扩展意义单位分析搭配COCAIdentity Extended Units of Meaning Collocate COCA
摘要: 本研究以“identity”一词为例,基于John Sinclair扩展意义单位分析模型,利用COCA语料库和WordSmith工具,系统分析该词的语义特征及用法规律。本文梳理了扩展意义单位分析理论,包括意核、搭配、类联接、语义倾向和语义韵等关键要素。然后在该理论指导下探索了“identity”的搭配结构,通过分析其搭配、类联接、语义倾向和语义韵,揭示了“identity”在不同语境中的多义性和使用特征,结果显示,identity常与(身份的)构建或归属共现时多含积极语义韵,在表明揭示或隐藏身份的语境中呈现消极语义韵。研究表明,扩展意义单位分析为深入理解词汇意义和语用特征提供了有效路径。
Abstract: Taking “identity” as an example, this study systematically analyzes its semantic features and usage patterns based on John Sinclair’s Extended Units of Meaning (EUM), using the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and WordSmith tools. This paper first outlines the theory of EUM, including its key elements: core, collocation, colligation, semantic preference, and semantic prosody. Guided by this theoretical framework, this study then explores the collocational structures of “identity”. By analyzing its collocations, colligations, semantic preferences and semantic prosodies, the study reveals how “identity” exhibits polysemy and distinctive usage patterns across different contexts. The results indicate that “identity” tends to carry a positive semantic prosody when co-occurring with notions of construction or belonging, whereas it exhibits a negative semantic prosody in contexts implying the revelation or concealment of identity. The study demonstrates that EUM provides an effective approach to understanding lexical meaning and pragmatic features.
文章引用:田靖潇. 扩展意义单位分析的应用研究:以“Identity”为例[J]. 现代语言学, 2026, 14(6): 910-919. https://doi.org/10.12677/ml.2026.146599

参考文献

[1] Tajfel, H., Turner, J., Austin, W.G. and Worchel, S. (2001) An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. Essential Readings, 94-109.
[2] Giddens, A. (2023) Modernity and Self-Identity. In: Social Theory Re-Wired, Routledge, 477-484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Wodak, R. (2001) The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, Sage Publications, 63-94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.
[5] Oteíza, T. (2006) J.R. MARTIN y D. ROSE. 2003. Working with Discourse. Meaning beyond the Clause. Estudios filológicos, 41, 293-295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 卫乃兴. 基于语料库和语料库驱动的词语搭配研究[J]. 当代语言学, 2002(2): 101-114+157.
[7] 李文中. 接着做: 扩展意义单位分析[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021(6): 13-26+88+161.
[8] 濮建忠. 扩展意义单位模型再解读[J]. 外语研究, 2020, 37(2): 1-8+112.
[9] Cruse, D.A. (1986) A Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[10] Lyons, J. (1977) Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
[11] Sinclair, J.M. (1991) Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford University Press.
[12] Sinclair, J.M. (1996) The Search for Units of Meaning. Textus, 4, 75-106.
[13] Sinclair, J.M. (2003) Reading Concordances: An Introduction. Pearson.
[14] Firth, J.R. (1968) Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, 1952-1959. Indiana University Press.
[15] 濮建忠. John Sinclair的短语理论与意义研究[J]. 当代外语研究, 2021(6): 60-76+160.
[16] 卫乃兴. 共选理论与语料库驱动的短语单位研究[J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2012, 35(1): 1-6+74+125.
[17] Firth, J.R. (1957) Papers in Linguistics 1934-1951. Oxford University Press.
[18] 李文中. 短语理论框架综论[J]. 外语教学与研究, 2018, 50(1): 49-59+160.