“双思、双能、双评”三结合进阶式教学创新实践
Innovative Practice of Progressive Teaching Combining “Dual Thinking, Dual Competence, Dual Evaluation”
DOI: 10.12677/ae.2026.1661258, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 刘玉敏, 陈 清:重庆科技大学电子与电气工程学院,重庆;孙永河*:重庆科技大学发展规划处,重庆
关键词: 数学知识预热一例到底差异化案例进阶式教学Mathematical Knowledge Warm-Up One Case Throughout Differentiated Cases Progressive Teaching
摘要: 《自动控制原理》课程是我校自动化及自动化相关专业的专业基础课程,是解决实际工程控制问题的基石。存在着“学生数学基础普遍薄弱难以适配课程对数学能力的高要求、课程理论分析碎片化难以使学生建立复杂完整的知识体系、教学案例的普适性难以满足新工科对学科交叉融合的需求”三大教学问题,制约着我校对人才的培养。为解决以上教学问题,团队围绕学校本科办学的定位,将思政教育与专业教育深度融合,开创了以“双思(思维、思政)”为引领,“双能(理论分析能力与实践应用能力)”为目标,“双评(过程评价与结果评价)”为标准的“进阶式”教学模式,通过“数学知识预热”强化学生基础、“一例到底”建立完整知识体系、“差异化案例”实现学科的交叉融合。引导学生循序渐进、稳扎稳打实现教学目标。
Abstract: The course “Principles of Automatic Control” is a fundamental course for our university’s automation and related majors, and it serves as the cornerstone for solving practical engineering control problems. There are three major teaching issues: “students’ generally weak mathematical foundation makes it difficult to meet the high mathematical requirements of the course, the fragmented theoretical analysis of the course makes it hard for students to establish a complex and complete knowledge system, and the universality of teaching cases cannot meet the demand of new engineering disciplines for cross-disciplinary integration”, which restricts the cultivation of application-oriented new engineering talents in our university. To address the aforementioned teaching challenges, the team, aligned with the university’s undergraduate program positioning, deeply integrated ideological and political education with professional education. They pioneered a “progressive” teaching model guided by “dual thinking (thinking and ideological and political education),” aimed at “dual abilities (theoretical analysis and practical application),” and standardized by “dual evaluation (process and outcome evaluation).” This model strengthens students’ foundational knowledge through “mathematical knowledge warm-up,” establishes a complete knowledge system through “one case throughout”, and achieves interdisciplinary integration through “differentiated cases.” It guides students to achieve teaching objectives step-by-step and steadily.
文章引用:刘玉敏, 孙永河, 陈清. “双思、双能、双评”三结合进阶式教学创新实践[J]. 教育进展, 2026, 16(6): 1289-1298. https://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2026.1661258

参考文献

[1] 刘玉敏, 邵克勇, 李艳辉, 霍凤财. 基于角色互换的自动控制原理五步教学法[J]. 科教导刊, 2017(12): 72-73.
[2] 刘洋. CDIO模式在自动控制原理教学中的应用研究[J]. 科技风, 2016(3): 113-114.
[3] 莫晓瑾, 蒋英钰. “自动控制原理”课程的CDIO模式探索与应用[J]. 南方农机, 2021, 52(8): 151-152.
[4] 肖婉丽, 白东平, 梁天硕. 基于PBL教学法的自动控制原理网络教学模式应用研究[J]. 女报, 2024(1): 139-141.
[5] 沈辉, 王建文, 陈芳林. 基于倒立摆的“自动控制原理”PBL教学[J]. 电气电子教学学报, 2013, 35(3): 100-103.
[6] 纪昕洋, 胡高山. 数字化背景下“自动控制原理”课程建设的创新与实践[J]. 时代人物, 2025(2): 245-248.
[7] 任金霞, 林元璋, 曾璐. “自动控制原理”课程教学模式探析[J]. 西部素质教育, 2017, 3(24): 153-154.
[8] 孙少杰, 裴玖玲. 《自动控制原理》课程差别化教学模式研究[J]. 河南科技, 2015(21): 277.
[9] 李晓杰, 董晖, 王一光. 基于自动控制原理的教学创新改革探索[J]. 科教导刊, 2023(31): 132-134.
[10] 王红林. 新工科背景下自动控制原理课程教学改革方法[J]. 科教导刊, 2023(9): 128-130.
[11] 薛鹏, 程辉, 郭会平. 自控原理课程的“一例到底”教学设计[J]. 科技风, 2020(20): 33, 41.
[12] 王海云, 宫丽娜, 唐亮, 陈婷. 自动控制原理课程思政教学策略与案例研究[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2023, 19(36): 158-161.
[13] 杨欣, 李斌, 徐盛友, 等. 基于MISO模型的“自动控制原理”课程质量评价[J]. 电气电子教学学报, 2017, 39(6): 5-7, 12.