凌家滩遗址公园保护与开发对策分析
Analysis on the Conservation and Development Strategies of Lingjiatan Site Park
摘要: 大遗址是中华历史文明的物质载体与区域发展的时代印记,承载着中华民族的价值理念与文明脉络,其保护与开发是文化遗产传承、文旅产业升级与区域可持续发展的核心议题。近年来,“让文物活起来”的理念深度融入大遗址保护开发实践,国家层面持续强化大遗址保护的顶层设计,推动其向地域特色鲜明的文化旅游产业转化,实现经济价值与文化软实力的双重提升。凌家滩遗址作为长江下游巢湖流域新石器时代核心聚落遗址,是中华文明探源的关键实证,其考古遗址公园的建设兼具文化保护与区域发展的双重使命。本文以凌家滩考古遗址公园为研究对象,结合2023~2025年最新考古发现、政策导向与行业实践,系统分析遗址公园保护与开发中现存的管理、法律、资金、技术及可持续发展等问题,从规划融合、利益平衡、制度保障、多方共建、多元发展五个维度提出优化对策,旨在为凌家滩遗址公园实现“保护为主、抢救第一、合理利用、加强管理”的目标提供实践路径,同时为国内同类大遗址保护开发提供参考。
Abstract: Great sites are the material carriers of Chinese historical civilization and the temporal imprints of regional development, bearing the value concepts and cultural context of the Chinese nation. Their protection and development are core issues in the inheritance of cultural heritage, the upgrading of cultural tourism industry and regional sustainable development. In recent years, the concept of “bringing cultural relics to life” has been deeply integrated into the practice of great site protection and development. The national level has continuously strengthened the top-level design of great site protection, promoting its transformation into a cultural tourism industry with distinct regional characteristics, and realizing the dual improvement of economic value and cultural soft power. As a core settlement site of the Neolithic Age in the Chaohu Lake basin of the lower Yangtze River, the Lingjiatan Site is a key empirical evidence for the exploration of Chinese civilization. The construction of its archaeological site park undertakes the dual mission of cultural protection and regional development. Taking Lingjiatan Archaeological Site Park as the research object, combined with the latest archaeological discoveries, policy orientation and industry practice from 2023 to 2025, this paper systematically analyzes the existing problems in management, law, capital, technology and sustainable development in the protection and development of the site park, and puts forward optimization countermeasures from five dimensions: planning integration, interest balance, institutional guarantee, multi-party co-construction and diversified development. The purpose is to provide a practical path for Lingjiatan Site Park to achieve the goal of “protection first, rescue first, rational utilization and strengthened management”, and at the same time provide a reference for the protection and development of similar great sites in China.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
吴峰. 浅析遗址公园的建设与保护——以曲阜鲁国故城为例[J]. 文物鉴定与鉴赏, 2022(4): 175-177.
|
|
[2]
|
李瑞. 推动大遗址保护利用融入现代生活: 《大遗址保护利用“十四五”专项规划》出台[N]. 中国文物报, 2021-11-19(005).
|
|
[3]
|
方晓珍. 历史文化名城建设与区域文化产业发展——以安徽省历史文化名城建设为例[J]. 宿州学院学报, 2012, 27(12): 19-23.
|
|
[4]
|
袁磊. 对国家考古遗址公园建设与发展的几点思考——以城坝遗址为例[J]. 文物鉴定与鉴赏, 2022(4): 167-171.
|
|
[5]
|
王安妮. 含山“凌家滩”国家考古遗址文化保护“活化”利用路径研究[J]. 现代营销, 2022(24): 126-128.
|
|
[6]
|
张颖岚. 文化遗产与社会发展论纲[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2024(2): 80-91.
|
|
[7]
|
刘昌祺, 芮潇. 浅析大运河遗址公园遗产展示与保护研究——以大运河江苏段为例[J]. 现代园艺, 2021, 44(23): 137-139.
|
|
[8]
|
孙华, 王建新, 赵荣, 等. 笔谈: 考古遗址公园模式下的大遗址保护管理与活化利用[J]. 中国文化遗产, 2022(4): 4-15.
|
|
[9]
|
席岳婷, 邓斌. 国家考古遗址公园公众感知度提升策略研究——以大明宫国家遗址公园为例[J]. 长安大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 23(3): 66-75.
|
|
[10]
|
刘强宁. 大地湾国家考古遗址公园建设与利用思考[J]. 文物鉴定与鉴赏, 2022(2): 172-175.
|
|
[11]
|
王京传.大遗址旅游: 保护与开发的协同实现[J]. 社会科学家, 2009(1): 92-95+99.
|
|
[12]
|
“十四五”文物保护和科技创新规划[N]. 中国文物报, 2021-11-09(003).
|