未成年人网络直播打赏合同问题研究
Research on the Contractual Issues of Minors’ Tipping in Live Streaming
摘要: 在数字经济快速发展的背景下,网络直播已成为未成年人重要的线上娱乐方式。然而,未成年人巨额打赏引发的合同纠纷频发,司法实践中对打赏合同的法律性质、效力认定、返还规则等问题存在较大分歧。未成年人网络直播打赏合同应认定为兼具服务对价性与赠与性的混合网络服务合同;其效力应区分无民事行为能力与限制民事行为能力分别判断;“与年龄、智力相适应”的判断需综合多重因素;合同无效或不生效后,应依据不当得利返还规则处理,并合理划分监护人、平台、主播的过错责任。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of the rapid development of the digital economy, live streaming has become an important online form of entertainment for minors. However, contract disputes arising from minors’ excessive tipping occur frequently, and there are significant disagreements in judicial practice regarding the legal nature, validity determination, and refund rules of tipping contracts. The tipping contract for minors in live streaming should be recognized as a hybrid online service contract that combines both consideration for services and donative intent. Its validity should be determined separately for persons without civil capacity and those with limited civil capacity. The determination of “compatible with age and intelligence” requires a comprehensive consideration of multiple factors. Where a contract is invalid or takes no effect, the rules of unjust enrichment should apply, and the fault liability of guardians, platforms, and streamers should be reasonably allocated.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
李杨. 未成年人直播打赏的法律效力[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2024, 39(5): 119-128.
|
|
[2]
|
熊丙万. 未成年人网络直播打赏合同问题研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2026, 56(2): 23-38.
|
|
[3]
|
张玉涛. 未成年人直播打赏纠纷的学理审视与实践反思[J]. 数字法治, 2023(4): 174-190.
|
|
[4]
|
戴蕙, 张志慧. 未成年人直播打赏法律实务问题探析[J]. 公民与法(审判版), 2025(3): 32-42.
|
|
[5]
|
孙铭成. 未成年人网络直播打赏行为的法律效力[J]. 山西青年职业学院学报, 2021, 34(4): 54-57+65.
|
|
[6]
|
狄行思. 论《民法典》视野下网络服务合同的认定及规范适用——以泛娱乐网络直播打赏为例[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2022(3): 84-98.
|
|
[7]
|
蔡莹莹. 未成年人网络直播打赏行为的法律问题研究[J]. 南方论刊, 2024(9): 69-71.
|
|
[8]
|
李婉琳, 符凯悦. 网络直播打赏行为的法律性质探析[J]. 文化学刊, 2021(1): 172-174.
|