面向数据出境的多维融合动态评估模型与高效计算技术
A Multidimensional Fusion Dynamic Evaluation Model and Efficient Computing Technology for Data Cross-Border Transfer
摘要: 在数据跨境流动日趋频繁的现实背景下,敏感数据出境安全已成为维护国家安全、公共利益与个人信息合法权益的关键环节。当前主流的数据出境风险评估方法多依赖静态指标体系与线性加权模型,存在风险要素耦合刻画不足、动态适配能力较弱、大规模场景下计算效率偏低等问题,难以满足金融、医疗、交通、工业等重点行业对风险精准量化、实时研判的实际需求。本文面向敏感数据出境全生命周期风险管控需求,提出一种多维融合动态评估模型。该模型构建覆盖数据敏感性、出境必要性、传输安全、主体管理能力与境外接收方保障水平的多维度风险指标体系,通过自注意力机制实现风险指标权重的动态分配,引入非线性耦合函数刻画多要素间风险叠加与传导效应,并依托在线学习实现模型参数的自适应更新。本文首次将自注意力机制与非线性耦合函数结合用于数据出境风险的动态量化评估,该模型能够更好地适应敏感数据出境风险的动态演变特征,具备良好的场景适应性与计算高效性,可以为机构数据出境合规自查和风险监测提供技术支持。
Abstract: Against the backdrop of increasingly frequent cross-border data flows, the security of sensitive data outbound transfer has become a critical link in safeguarding national security, public interests and the legitimate rights and interests of personal information. Most mainstream risk assessment methodologies for data outbound transfer currently rely on static indicator systems and linear weighting models. Such approaches suffer from insufficient depiction of the coupling between risk factors, weak dynamic adaptability, and low computational efficiency in large-scale scenarios, making them unable to meet the practical demands of key sectors including finance, healthcare, transportation and industry for accurate risk quantification and real-time risk analysis. Targeting the full-lifecycle risk control requirements for sensitive data outbound transfer, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional integrated dynamic assessment model. The model establishes a multi-dimensional risk indicator system covering data sensitivity, necessity of outbound transfer, transmission security, management capacity of data controllers, and the protection standard of overseas data recipients. It leverages the self-attention mechanism to dynamically assign weights to risk indicators, introduces a nonlinear coupling function to characterize the risk superposition and transmission effects among multiple factors, and realizes adaptive updates of model parameters via online learning. This paper innovatively combines the self-attention mechanism and nonlinear coupling function for the dynamic quantitative assessment of data outbound transfer risks for the first time. Capable of better adapting to the dynamic evolution characteristics of sensitive data outbound risks, the proposed model boasts favorable scenario adaptability and high computational efficiency. It can provide technical support for organizations to conduct compliance self-inspections and risk monitoring of cross-border data transfers.
文章引用:段金典, 贾丹, 李文婷, 杨晓伟, 张明岩, 周子钰. 面向数据出境的多维融合动态评估模型与高效计算技术[J]. 计算机科学与应用, 2026, 16(6): 321-331. https://doi.org/10.12677/csa.2026.166231

参考文献

[1] 马述忠, 房超, 梁银锋. 数字贸易及其时代价值与研究展望[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2018(10): 16-30.
[2] 李航. 我国数据跨境流动规则的不足与完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 华东政法大学, 2018.
[3] 石进, 徐宗煌, 邵波, 等. 总体国家安全观下数据跨境流动风险治理研究[J]. 学术探索, 2026(3): 131-145.
[4] 董克, 吴佳纯, 马廷灿. 我国数据出境安全风险要素体系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(6): 49-59.
[5] 赵兴文, 蔡佳音, 李晖, 等. 企业数据出境动态风险评估与安全监管体系研究[J]. 信息安全研究, 2026, 12(2): 124-133.
[6] 彭勇, 江常青, 谢丰, 戴忠华, 熊琦, 高洋. 工业控制系统信息安全研究进展[J]. 清华大学学报: 自然科学版, 2012, 52(10): 1396-1408.
[7] 杨云雪, 鲁骁, 董军. 基于企业环境的网络安全风险评估[J]. 计算机科学与探索, 2016, 10(10): 1387-1397.
[8] 李存斌, 蔺帅帅, 徐方秋. 基于改进VIKOR法的云计算环境下用户行为安全的评估研究[J]. 计算机科学, 2017, 44(12): 105-109+119.
[9] 肖招娣. 移动互联网应用平台中信息安全态势评估研究[J]. 计算机仿真, 2017, 34(3): 423-426.
[10] 陈璐, 刘行, 陈牧, 李尼格, 戴造建. 基于图的可扩展移动应用安全评估模型[J]. 计算机工程, 2018, 44(5): 78-82.
[11] Alberts, C. and Dorofee, A. (2002) Managing Information Security Risks: The OCTAVE Approach. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co.
[12] Stolen, K., den Braber, F., Dimitrakos, T., Fredriksen, T., Gran, B.A., Houmb, S., et al. (2002) Model-Based Risk Assessment—The CORAS Approach.
[13] Karabacak, B. and Sogukpinar, I. (2005) ISRAM: Information Security Risk Analysis Method. Computers & Security, 24, 147-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Vorster, A. and Labuschagne, L. (2005) A Framework for Comparing Different Information Security Risk Analysis Methodologies. Proceedings of SAICSIT 2005, White River, 20-22 September 2005, 95-103.
[15] Chang, K.H., Chung, H.Y., Wang, C.N., et al. (2023) A New Hybrid Fermatean Fuzzy Set and Entropy Method for Risk Assessment. Axioms, 12, Article 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 吴文刚, 张志文, 王庆生. 基于模糊综合评判和AHP信息安全风险评估模型[J]. 重庆理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 31(7): 156-161.
[17] 王奕, 费洪晓, 蒋蘋. FAHP方法在信息安全风险评估中的研究[J]. 计算机工程与科学, 2006, 28(9): 4-6+12.
[18] 张本群. 基于危险理论的电子政务系统信息安全风险评估[J]. 微电子学与计算机, 2012, 29(9): 71-73+78.
[19] 王姣, 范科峰, 莫玮. 基于模糊集和DS证据理论的信息安全风险评估方法[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2017, 34(11): 3432-3436.
[20] 冯雪峰, 龚军, 吕小毅. 模糊神经网络信息安全风险评估方法在信息系统中的应用[J]. 现代计算机, 2018, 24(16): 50-54.
[21] Lin, X. and Qi, Z. (2025) Dynamic Risk Prediction in Financial-Production Systems Using Temporal Self-Attention and Adaptive Autoregressive Models. Frontiers in Physics, 13, Article 1627551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] 索玮岚, 徐文杰, 孙晓蕾. 多灾害耦合情境下城市关键基础设施失效风险建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(6): 1-12.
[23] 张蛟磊, 李刚, 余定浩, 等. 考虑腐蚀与疲劳耦合损伤的滨海工程结构地震风险分析[J]. 工程力学, 2026, 43(5): 1-12.
[24] 张凯, 时金桥, 马乐乐, 等. 数据出境安全风险监测预警关键技术综述[J]. 通信学报, 2025, 46(12): 1-18.
[25] 董克, 吴佳纯, 马廷灿. 我国数据出境安全风险要素体系研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2024, 47(6): 49-59.