人工智能与企业ESG表现——基于国家新一代人工智能创新发展试验区的政策效应
Artificial Intelligence and Corporate ESG Performance—Based on the Policy Effects of the Construction of New Generation of National AI Innovative Development Pilot Zones
摘要: 人工智能作为引领新一轮科技革命的战略性技术,对企业可持续发展与ESG表现具有深远影响。本文以国家新一代人工智能创新发展试验区的批次设立为准自然实验,构建多期双重差分模型,基于2009~2024年沪深A股企业数据,系统考察人工智能创新政策对企业ESG表现的因果效应。研究发现:(1) 试验区政策显著提升辖区企业ESG表现,经多项稳健性检验后结论依然成立;(2) 机制检验表明,数字技术创新在政策与ESG表现之间发挥正向中介作用,媒体关注度则发挥不一致中介作用,正式制度供给对非正式舆论监督产生部分替代效应;(3) 融资约束对政策效应具有显著负向调节作用,行业集中度则发挥显著正向调节作用;(4) 政策效应在城市行政等级、数字关注度与市场化程度三个维度上存在显著异质性,制度环境相对完善地区的政策促进效果更为突出。本文为人工智能政策与企业ESG关系研究提供了新的经验证据,对优化人工智能创新政策设计与差异化推进ESG治理具有重要政策启示。
Abstract: As a strategic technology spearheading the new wave of technological revolution, artificial intelligence has a profound impact on corporate sustainability and ESG performance. This paper utilises the phased establishment of the National New Generation Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Development Pilot Zones as a quasi-natural experiment. By constructing a multi-period difference-in-differences model and drawing on data from A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2009 to 2024, we systematically examine the causal effects of artificial intelligence innovation policies on corporate ESG performance. The findings reveal that: (1) policies in the pilot zones significantly enhance the ESG performance of enterprises within their jurisdictions, a conclusion that remains valid following multiple robustness tests; (2) mechanism tests indicate that digital technology innovation mediates positively between policy and ESG performance, whilst media attention mediates inconsistently; formal institutional provision exerts a partial substitution effect on informal public oversight; (3) Financing constraints exert a significant negative moderating effect on policy outcomes, whilst industry concentration exerts a significant positive moderating effect; (4) Policy effects exhibit significant heterogeneity across three dimensions: urban administrative level, digital attention, and degree of marketisation, with policy promotion effects being more pronounced in regions with relatively sound institutional environments. This paper provides new empirical evidence regarding the relationship between AI policies and corporate ESG, offering important policy implications for optimising the design of AI innovation policies and promoting differentiated ESG governance.
文章引用:何奕淳. 人工智能与企业ESG表现——基于国家新一代人工智能创新发展试验区的政策效应[J]. 电子商务评论, 2026, 15(6): 839-853. https://doi.org/10.12677/ecl.2026.156702

参考文献

[1] IEA (2025) Energy and AI.
https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai
[2] Liu, Y. and Shen, X. (2025) Navigating ESG in the Artificial Intelligence Era: Evidence from AI Pilot Zones in China. International Studies of Economics, 21, 131-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] 宋诚, 李季刚. 人工智能技术与企业ESG表现[J]. 企业经济, 2026, 45(3): 140-149.
[4] 周卫华, 朱传杰. 人工智能创新发展与企业全要素生产率——来自国家新一代人工智能创新发展试验区的证据[J]. 工业技术经济, 2025, 44(10): 79-88.
[5] 欧阳金琼, 魏德强, 王雨濛. 人工智能对新质生产力的影响——基于新一代人工智能创新发展试验区的政策效应[J]. 软科学, 2025, 39(3): 28-36.
[6] 廖斌, 韩雷. 人工智能对新质生产力发展的影响研究——基于国家新一代人工智能创新发展试验区的考察[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2025, 42(3): 100-114.
[7] 曾江洪, 赵丹. 人工智能发展对企业劳动收入份额的影响——来自国家新一代人工智能创新发展试验区的证据[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版), 2025, 31(5): 97-110.
[8] Cooke, P. (1992) Regional Innovation Systems: Competitive Regulation in the New Europe. Geoforum, 23, 365-382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Lundvall, B.A. (1992) National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Anthem Press.
[10] Cooke, P., Gomez Uranga, M. and Etxebarria, G. (1997) Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organisational Dimensions. Research Policy, 26, 475-491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge University Press.
[12] 胡洁, 于宪荣, 韩一鸣. ESG评级能否促进企业绿色转型?——基于多时点双重差分法的验证[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(7): 90-111.
[13] 唐秋雨, 谭伟杰, 申明浩, 等. 人工智能技术能提高企业ESG表现吗?——基于动态博弈的成本收入分析[J]. 财经研究, 2025, 51(2): 94-108.
[14] Huang, Y., Liu, S., Gan, J., Liu, B. and Wu, Y. (2024) How Does the Construction of New Generation of National AI Innovative Development Pilot Zones Drive Enterprise ESG Development? Empirical Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 140, Article 108011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A. and Song, M. (2017) Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World. MIS Quarterly, 41, 223-238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 黄勃, 李海彤, 刘俊岐, 等. 数字技术创新与中国企业高质量发展——来自企业数字专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(3): 97-115.
[17] 阳镇, 陈劲, 凌鸿程. 媒体关注、环境政策不确定性与企业绿色技术创新——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理工程学报, 2023, 37(4): 1-15.
[18] 权小锋, 吴世农. 媒体关注的治理效应及其治理机制研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2012(5): 59-67.
[19] MacKinnon, D.P., Krull, J.L. and Lockwood, C.M. (2000) Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 高杰英, 褚冬晓, 廉永辉, 等. ESG表现能改善企业投资效率吗? [J]. 证券市场导报, 2021(11): 24-34, 72.
[21] 陶锋, 朱盼, 邱楚芝, 等. 数字技术创新对企业市场价值的影响研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(5): 68-91.
[22] 袁业虎, 熊笑涵. 上市公司ESG表现与企业绩效关系研究——基于媒体关注的调节作用[J]. 江西社会科学, 2021, 41(10): 68-77.
[23] Hadlock, C.J. and Pierce, J.R. (2010) New Evidence on Measuring Financial Constraints: Moving Beyond the KZ Index. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1909-1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] 姜付秀, 黄磊, 张敏. 产品市场竞争、公司治理与代理成本[J]. 世界经济, 2009, 32(10): 46-59.
[25] 陈强, 齐霁, 颜冠鹏. 双重差分法的安慰剂检验: 一个实践的指南[J]. 管理世界, 2025, 41(2): 181-220.
[26] de Chaisemartin, C. and D’Haultfœuille, X. (2020) Two-Way Fixed Effects Estimators with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. American Economic Review, 110, 2964-2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Callaway, B. and Sant’Anna, P.H.C. (2021) Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225, 200-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] 谭劲松, 黄仁玉, 张京心. ESG表现与企业风险——基于资源获取视角的解释[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(5): 3-18.
[29] 白俊红, 张艺璇, 卞元超. 创新驱动政策是否提升城市创业活跃度——来自国家创新型城市试点政策的经验证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(6): 61-78.
[30] 刘毛桃, 方徐兵, 李光勤. 政府数字关注与企业数字创新——来自政府工作报告文本分析的证据[J]. 中国经济学, 2023(3): 111-142, 350-352.
[31] 俞红海, 徐龙炳, 陈百助. 终极控股股东控制权与自由现金流过度投资[J]. 经济研究, 2010, 45(8): 103-114.
[32] 李延喜, 包世泽, 高锐, 等. 薪酬激励、董事会监管与上市公司盈余管理[J]. 南开管理评论, 2007(6): 55-61.
[33] Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. and Howitt, P. (2005) Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701-728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[34] Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990) Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[35] 杨仁发, 杨静. 数字技术创新对企业ESG表现影响研究[J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2024, 39(11): 93-104.
[36] He, F., Guo, X. and Yue, P. (2024) Media Coverage and Corporate ESG Performance: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, Article 103003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[37] Gu, L. and Li, Q. (2025) The Impact of Media Attention on Firm ESG Decisions: The Role of Sinful Industries. Finance Research Letters, 85, Article 108086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef